there arent that many of those
also in the uk telecom has a lot of competition
well, it's either a natural barrier to entry or an artificial one built with huge swaths of capital.
in the case of a large tech company like microsoft, it's both- look at the patent wars they wage to lock emerging competitors out of certain markets.
its in the interests of those that hold all of the capital to optimize the status quo, rather than allow for genuine competition and innovation- the idea that capitalism is responsible for those things is a myth with a poor empirical track record, in my opinion.
Because capitalism has to be that way eventually
SYNOPSIS IS IN THE BUILDING![]()
THROW YOUR MOTHERFUCKING HANDS IN THE AIR RIGHT NOW![]()
PUT YOUR HANDS IN THE AIR RIGHT NOW
YEAH! ok
SYNOPSIS IS IN THE BUILDING![]()
THROW YOUR MOTHERFUCKING HANDS IN THE AIR RIGHT NOW![]()
PUT YOUR HANDS IN THE AIR RIGHT NOW
YEAH! ok
Xpev 30% day
well, it's either a natural barrier to entry or an artificial one built with huge swaths of capital.
in the case of a large tech company like microsoft, it's both- look at the patent wars they wage to lock emerging competitors out of certain markets.
its in the interests of those that hold all of the capital to optimize the status quo, rather than allow for genuine competition and innovation- the idea that capitalism is responsible for those things is a myth with a poor empirical track record, in my opinion.
agree on tech, gotta do anti trust to ensure compeititon
SYNOPSIS IS IN THE BUILDING![]()
THROW YOUR MOTHERFUCKING HANDS IN THE AIR RIGHT NOW![]()
PUT YOUR HANDS IN THE AIR RIGHT NOW
YEAH! ok
Econ niggas stand up
. Working in finance though
Wall Street nigha you dig
econ checking in
doing data though. finance stressed me out too much and i had to switch it up lol
agree on tech, gotta do anti trust to ensure compeititon
well you can continue to make those kind of adjustments, but you're just attending to symptoms rather than the cause IMO
agreed, in the 50s and 60s and even 70s when america was booming, pre-reagan era
taxes were higher and regulations were in place for the rich, thanks to FDR's new deal, which the right-wing gutted for decades like hawks
trickle-down economics was the best lie we were ever sold on
Their biggest accomplishment was brainwashing people into thinking a normal welfare state is communism or even socialism
It’s hilarious and sad the most influential economists today were ridiculed and discredited by their peers before reagan and thatcher among others changed everybody’s perception on what capitalism should be
econ checking in
doing data though. finance stressed me out too much and i had to switch it up lol
is Econ worth it im studying ecology rn, and im wondering about switching?
i feel, if we're gonna live in capitalism, why not twist and turn it into the best thing it can be, for the people, not just for the exclusive wealthy club at the top
fr we can shelter the vulnerable at least. Give people healthcare
is Econ worth it im studying ecology rn, and im wondering about switching?
heavily dependent on your school
econ checking in
doing data though. finance stressed me out too much and i had to switch it up lol
Lmao does anyone that’s not a psychopath legit enjoys working in finance for more than a few years
cause they own the companies, upping capital gains tax will only hurt the middle class, we need a higher corporate tax but that could result in a lot of companies leaving the US
The only time(s) the middle class has ever prospered in this country was when taxes were the highest on the upper class? As it's been lowered so has the quality of life for middle and low income families.
37 pages? What happened itt
Socialists vs the crypto thread people