I think it’s funny that K-pop is the only genre where I can listen to AI-generated vocal songs because it’s already so generic anyway
OP recent song sounds AI generated so this tracks
the one i'm asking for a verse on in creative section?
the one i'm asking for a verse on in creative section?
yea, I seen the bump
Very few implications of AI in art that are acceptable to me
But my friend with no coding knowledge is using AI to do the coding for him to make a reverb/delay/granulator plug-in i think its pretty dope
never seen a dude who uses ai like this and is walking around with a chick like madison beer... it speaks volumes on someone's character
@Jonboi got heart, he know how this KTT2 s*** get
i still might want a verse on that, so the attention is all good
never seen a dude who uses ai like this and is walking around with a chick like madison beer... it speaks volumes on someone's character
🚨 Gonna give op an in depth thought out response instead of just hate mongering AI or d*** sucking AI without any nuance or thought
Most people hate thoughtless and unedited straight raw AI
And most people that use AI are making thoughtless and unedited straight raw AI
This is the major issue, outside of job outsourcing, environment damage, creativity recycling and "fast tracking" something that is suppose to be fun and with meaning - also that the lazy majority creators are generating off of someone else's work and sources, not their own work and sources
There are a few "ethical" and cool ways to use AI in creative and workflow spaces that are interesting and self built upon, but there are hella of a lot of ways to use it unethically, lazy, sloppy and lame ways
Most AI users are s*** creatives that create s*** work, but instead of just making s*** on their own that is overall harmless at the end of the day, their s*** is now directly affecting others negatively in multiple aspects both in creative and ethics
I do think AI can be good as a tool, ive used it once myself to create a custom art filter overlay on top of my own footage n assets for a video for a song of mine, that went through multiple custom generations on top of further personal editing in Photo and video software frame by frame - but most people using AI, and especially the tech bros and entertainment corps, are not using and not going to use their own sources and art to generate upon and are not going to extend the further actual skill effort of fixing and correcting and then improving upon the AI work themselevs with their own skills and creative input in separate manual programs
My opinion, anyways
never seen a dude who uses ai like this and is walking around with a chick like madison beer... it speaks volumes on someone's character
?
I get it.
Nobody wants to have a nuanced discussion about AI because it's such an easy topic to throw performative swings at.
But, it's the new Google. It's not going away.
"performative swings"
man we can tell what side yall gon be on when s*** hits the fan.
musicians are really the w****s of the entertainment industry man lol.
Everyone else in the industry saw AI coming and at the very least staged strikes to protect their own identity and likeliness. All we did was jump on it like the $5 w****s we is (and let me not disrespect s***workers cause as of 2025, s***workers got better standards than the regular degular musician if we wanna keep it a buck.)
we don't actually want nothing to improve and we'll always be the first one to jump on the "next big thing" in order to somehow increase upon the obviously false but still captivating illusion of "increasing in wealth" while eliminating key proponents of art that have been responsible for some of the most longest lasting innovations and musical accomplishments within the medium.
point of views like @op are legit no better than the niggas that first created the ideas of "avatars" (e.g. the milli vanillis) or people that are the frontman of songs that come out but don't actually sing the song.
This is a pretty disgusting thread and shame on @op for making it. Blocked on IG 100% for sure.
Its going to become the norm like the internet is.
10% will gain productivity,
80% will be the same or less
10% will refuse to use it
Its going to become the norm like the internet is.
10% will gain productivity,
80% will be the same or less
10% will refuse to use it
yall are basing this on what 
genuinely what is AI doing that is comparable to the advent of the INTERNET
medical advancements is legit the only thing i can think
AI trash unless it's making people's life better or treating the cure for cancer or dementia, then what is the purpose?
AI will never make something as hard as B****es Brew on von
A paintbrush is an apparatus that is necessary in certain creative processes. AI is not that.
Both are creative tools not creators
I already said it and I'll say it again!
I'll allow AI for Video Games in example and CPU dialogue in RPGs and Storylines Etc Etc to Develop NPCs
However AI in ACTUAL ART like MUSIC
Is A NONO
Ai For Video Games or To fix Trash rushed Quick Animation Like Dragon ball super, I approve
Actually If AI is used To create some Insane Very Creative Samples that wouldn't be possible that's okay
yall are basing this on what 
genuinely what is AI doing that is comparable to the advent of the INTERNET
medical advancements is legit the only thing i can think
I was making a comparison of tech tools, not directly comparing the two in terms of advancement.
🚨 Gonna give op an in depth thought out response instead of just hate mongering AI or d*** sucking AI without any nuance or thought
Most people hate thoughtless and unedited straight raw AI
And most people that use AI are making thoughtless and unedited straight raw AI
This is the major issue, outside of job outsourcing, environment damage, creativity recycling and "fast tracking" something that is suppose to be fun and with meaning - also that the lazy majority creators are generating off of someone else's work and sources, not their own work and sources
There are a few "ethical" and cool ways to use AI in creative and workflow spaces that are interesting and self built upon, but there are hella of a lot of ways to use it unethically, lazy, sloppy and lame ways
Most AI users are s*** creatives that create s*** work, but instead of just making s*** on their own that is overall harmless at the end of the day, their s*** is now directly affecting others negatively in multiple aspects both in creative and ethics
I do think AI can be good as a tool, ive used it once myself to create a custom art filter overlay on top of my own footage n assets for a video for a song of mine, that went through multiple custom generations on top of further personal editing in Photo and video software frame by frame - but most people using AI, and especially the tech bros and entertainment corps, are not using and not going to use their own sources and art to generate upon and are not going to extend the further actual skill effort of fixing and correcting and then improving upon the AI work themselevs with their own skills and creative input in separate manual programs
My opinion, anyways
@op
thank you @Water_Giver
there's no money, no nothing you could tell me to not want my art to be as good as it can be. as an artist, and in the example you gave, i know you know about that. just
tryna bring the vision to life. so, imma try s***, and if it results in something good, i have a very hard time being like nah, cause im just an obsessive fiend for the best art. and, there's also a reality where, what if there's an artist out there who would otherwise sink, and deprive us their creative genius if not for a tool that could help the world become a more creative place. maybe this helps struggling artists give the world more beauty. as a TOOL. as a HELPER. not as a replacement. the artist is still everything to me.