they wouldnt have let this guy have a story on 60 minutes primetime if any of this s*** was real
there's good reasons to be skeptical
and then there's this
"well he was on tv so it must be fake"
again, there's good reasons to be skeptical, and then there's this
"well it sounds crazy, so it can't be true"
we got footage of these s***s, them uaps be doing crazy ass things already lol
Which laws
I have a chemistry degree but lets do it lol
(i) Instantaneous acceleration absent apparent inertia. this is the 1st law of newtonian physics. And maybe 3?
(ii) Hypersonic velocity absent a thermal signature and
sonic shockwave. This applies to sound etc and maybe thermodynamics? im guessing right here
(iii) Transmedium (such as space-to-ground and air-to-
undersea) travel. IDk about this one. I just know we dont have anything that can do this lol.
(iv) Positive lift contrary to known aerodynamic
principles.
(v) Multispectral signature control. Idk what this means actually
(vi) Physical or invasive biological effects to close
observers and the environment. (i can probably do a paragraph on this because im dreezymd but you get it..radiation or unknown unknowns as Grusch said)
But they aren't testing it. They explain that these objects strictly monitor on a daily basis and also have a keen interest in nuclear weapons. They've even disabled nuclear weapons at some point. None of those actions make sense in some sort of testing fashion. These higher up military personnel clearly want to keep their technology secret so it makes no sense to just monitor your own Navy and turn of nukes randomly
Why do you think monitoring, even on a daily basis, would be out of the realm of testing purposes? Are you referring to the Salas claims with the nuclear weapons bit or is there a different event? As far as I know his story has been changing for decades and in that time he has never provided any evidence so idk how much stock I put in his story.
again, there's good reasons to be skeptical, and then there's this
"well it sounds crazy, so it can't be true"
we got footage of these s***s, them uaps be doing crazy ass things already lol
Did the Vartican hide evidence of aliens? Did Mussolini do so as well?
there's good reasons to be skeptical
and then there's this
"well he was on tv so it must be fake"
#1 reason to be skeptical though is that there is no proof and they've ran this exact psyop before
Did the Vartican hide evidence of aliens? Did Mussolini do so as well?
f*** if i know
but it's not like u know either
Yes if 1 white writer guy on twitter says hes a nutcase vs a handful of military intelligence saying hes legit we should probably believe the twitter guy
Last week people were saying Nevada ufo was a hoax and now we got it confirmed it’s real we have aliens
S*** was more believable before it was all over the mainstream news shows and in front of congress. that 60 minutes episode should've set off all the alarms
You're not explaining why
as always
#1 reason to be skeptical though is that there is no proof and they've ran this exact psyop before
yeah, those are good reasons
!dream communist alien jihad
My favorite poster itt is always Lou
because bro will be like
"This s*** fake." and itll get 3 hearts
then niggas will be like...WHY LOU.. and he'll just say some s*** about psyop and then the discussion is over lmao
“Something I can’t discuss in a public setting”
me when I lie
It's because of the whistleblower protection act. If he discloses any classified information in a public setting, he will lose his whistleblower privileges and will be put in prison. He agreed to disclose any additional information in an enclosed environment where he won't be breaching any of that
It's because of the whistleblower protection act. If he discloses any classified information in a public setting, he will lose his whistleblower privileges and will be put in prison. He agreed to disclose any additional information in an enclosed environment where he won't be breaching any of that
bro you could literally explain why he has done what he has done every step up to this point and people will still say psyop/fake lol
It’s so simple.
It’s a cover up of America’s weapons program. Trillions of dollars have been devoted to this stuff and the result is unexplainable aerial activity that needs some sort of cover.
And it’s not the main part, but all news is basically about how our institutions are crumbling, our economy is teetering, our ecology is teetering, none of the institutions are capable of dealing with it - hey, what if there’s an alien! They could have earth-saving new tech!
Psychologically it’s of the same lofty fantasy as going to Mars or any other escape from the trap we’ve found ourselves in.
^
What would be so surprising that people in power in the past covered this up too?
In accordance with protocols, Grusch provided the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review at the Department of Defense with the information he intended to disclose to us. His on-the-record statements were all “cleared for open publication” on April 4 and 6, 2023, in documents provided to us.
thedebrief.org/intelligence-officials-say-u-s-has-retrieved-non-human-craft
Omg can we get this Lou guy out of here. This mf must work for the government the way he keeps pushing this "it's all military vehicles" nonsense
I have a chemistry degree but lets do it lol
(i) Instantaneous acceleration absent apparent inertia. this is the 1st law of newtonian physics. And maybe 3?
(ii) Hypersonic velocity absent a thermal signature and
sonic shockwave. This applies to sound etc and maybe thermodynamics? im guessing right here
(iii) Transmedium (such as space-to-ground and air-to-
undersea) travel. IDk about this one. I just know we dont have anything that can do this lol.
(iv) Positive lift contrary to known aerodynamic
principles.
(v) Multispectral signature control. Idk what this means actually
(vi) Physical or invasive biological effects to close
observers and the environment. (i can probably do a paragraph on this because im dreezymd but you get it..radiation or unknown unknowns as Grusch said)
(i) Instantaneous acceleration absent apparent inertia: Newton's first law (the law of inertia) states that an object will remain at rest or in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by an external force. Instantaneous acceleration would imply an incredibly high force. Such high acceleration without inertia is challenging to explain with our current understanding of physics, as it would require an immense energy source and potentially result in destructive forces for the object or beings inside. It also raises questions about how such forces could be transmitted without a reaction (third law).
This is the crux of the matter, I think this is what all this is about, enormous energy without enormous effects. Could be nuclear
(ii) Hypersonic velocity absent a thermal signature and sonic shockwave: High-speed travel through a medium like air usually results in a shockwave (sonic boom) and generates heat due to air friction. An object moving at hypersonic velocities without these effects seems to defy our understanding of fluid dynamics and thermodynamics.
Not a law of physics
(iii) Transmedium travel: UFOs have been reported to move seamlessly between different mediums like air, water, and potentially space. Our current technology requires different vehicles for each medium because of the different forces and principles at play, such as buoyancy in water versus lift in the air.
Not a law of physics
(iv) Positive lift contrary to known aerodynamic principles: Traditional flight requires a balance of forces, with lift overcoming weight. Objects that seem to hover or maneuver without visible means of propulsion or lift surfaces (like wings) defy our current understanding of aerodynamics.
Not a law of physics
(v) Multispectral signature control: This could refer to the ability to control the electromagnetic radiation an object emits or reflects across various wavelengths (visible light, infrared, radio waves, etc.). This could involve advanced stealth technologies or concepts beyond our current knowledge.
Not a law of physics
(vi) Physical or invasive biological effects to close observers and the environment: There have been reports of UFO encounters causing physical or biological effects, such as radiation sickness or interference with electrical equipment. These effects are not well understood and are often disputed.
Not a law of physics
but all news is basically about how our institutions are crumbling, our economy is teetering, our ecology is teetering, none of the institutions are capable of dealing with it - hey, what if there’s an alien! They could have earth-saving new tech!
Nobody today ever said anything about aliens are going to save earth man
This is all being framed in a national security perspective