Reply
  • May 11, 2021
    ·
    edited
    Villainous B

    Go back to your original point, you've moved the goalposts here.

    Did any of the allies even know about Unit 731 for starters, did it play a role in the US dropping Fatboy and Little man? You can't retroactively start justifying war crimes.

    Assuming they had zero additional intelligence, they knew that Japan had expressed interest in developing biological weapons prior to the war and that they had used chemical weapons in China.

    It would be hard to say that it didn’t play any factor in dropping the atomic bombs given the sort of arms race happening during the war. We know that the fear of retaliation via WMDs was a deterrent for Japan using biological weapons on the west coast.

  • May 11, 2021
    STILLSUNNY

    cmon man, its not personal, after their invention nukes were gonna be dropped at least once, because the scale of destruction is beyond incomprehensible

    at the very least it was used on at the time nazi sypathsers (and a lot of innocents of course) instead of another context

    doesnt make it ok, but its not the worst case scenario

    I'm just pointing out how I don't think citizens of North America would think the same way if the same atrocity had been put onto their ancestors.

    That's all.

  • Villainous B

    Point I'm getting at is the possibility of a war on what would be fought on two fronts would have guaranteed Japan's surrender without having to resort to the carpet bombing or nukes. Pretty sure Japan would have surrender even before the Soviets declared war so the peace process wouldn't involve the Soviets.

    Ah ok fair enough then

  • May 13, 2021

    My only question is ..why the second one

  • May 15, 2021

    Imagine caring so much about some random ktt posters opinions that you have to put a disclaimer in op

  • May 16, 2021
    ·
    edited

    There was no unregrettable outcome for both sides tbh

  • May 16, 2021
    Gojira

    “Using a nuke would show the world not to use it again”

    Would have been better if it just never happened lmfao

    Imo now that i’ve read this , a nuke would have definitely been dropped during the cold war. or i should say a nuke is what sparked a cold war from even existing in our timeline. sounds crazy but

  • May 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Villainous B

    Either way it was f***ed, Japan were willing to take a conditional surrender, then America dropped a nuke over civilians.

    "Conditional surrender" is just another way to say "please no consequences even though we attacked you first"

  • May 16, 2021
    ·
    4 replies
    orangejuice

    its crazy because if japan or any other country had done this to the US or Canada i dont think yall would be posting about how you understand it was a necessary evil that a bunch of innocents were vaporized

    Context matters, if we surprised attack Japan first it'd be hard to argue against. Japan killed innocent people at pearl harbor so why should the US not return the favor

  • May 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    rano

    Only americans think dropping literal nukes on civilians is ever justifiable dine

    why are they arguing this is beyond me

  • May 16, 2021

    Years and generations of families getting cancer and are born with birth defects but people itt are still justifying this I'm crying

  • May 16, 2021

    also its so funny that only users with drake avis and known drake stans are defending this itt
    that certified neoliberal boy meme was right

  • May 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    kiddash3r

    why are they arguing this is beyond me

    People wanna play devil’s advocates so bad with that “ground warfare would’ve been even worse!” s*** lmao

  • May 16, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    The Darkest Angel

    Context matters, if we surprised attack Japan first it'd be hard to argue against. Japan killed innocent people at pearl harbor so why should the US not return the favor

    We lost 2,403 people at Pearl Harbor

    They lost 200,000+ people and a generation of survivors were left with a higher risk of cancer and birth defects

    That's not really "returning the favor"

  • May 16, 2021

    Not retaliating for Pearl Harbor

  • May 16, 2021
    ·
    3 replies
    ziggy

    People wanna play devil’s advocates so bad with that “ground warfare would’ve been even worse!” s*** lmao

    Ok so let's say no bombs

    What should the US do? The ground invasion argument is backed up by the math, on paper more people die so that's even more tragic

  • Noir

    We lost 2,403 people at Pearl Harbor

    They lost 200,000+ people and a generation of survivors were left with a higher risk of cancer and birth defects

    That's not really "returning the favor"

    I know but when we look at the full picture then it's still the Emperor's and military leaders fault for attacking Pearl Harbor knowing it was a bad idea

  • May 16, 2021
    The Darkest Angel

    Ok so let's say no bombs

    What should the US do? The ground invasion argument is backed up by the math, on paper more people die so that's even more tragic

    F*** should I know 😂 i don’t know enough about it, I just know that the US military doesn’t pick the best solutions to problems 🤷‍♂️

  • May 16, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    The Darkest Angel

    Ok so let's say no bombs

    What should the US do? The ground invasion argument is backed up by the math, on paper more people die so that's even more tragic

    nothing, the soviets would have handled it

  • May 16, 2021
    The Darkest Angel

    "Conditional surrender" is just another way to say "please no consequences even though we attacked you first"

    The condition was more or less let the emperor be, which happened anyway. Japan got a great conditions upon surrendering.
    You're just trying to justify the unjustifiable

  • May 16, 2021
    The Darkest Angel

    Context matters, if we surprised attack Japan first it'd be hard to argue against. Japan killed innocent people at pearl harbor so why should the US not return the favor

    Dafuq is wrong with you

  • May 16, 2021
    The Darkest Angel

    Ok so let's say no bombs

    What should the US do? The ground invasion argument is backed up by the math, on paper more people die so that's even more tragic

    Ground invasion wouldn't have been necessary, Japan weren't weren't willing to fight a way on two fronts, with the Russian prepping to declare war on Japan.

  • May 16, 2021
    Synopsis

    nothing, the soviets would have handled it

    Crazy how happy people are with pretending Japan were five with prolonging the way with the Soviets ready to declare war.
    Japan knew the war was lost, and def didn't want the Soviets to declare war so they'd have to answer to them as well when they were forced into submission.

  • May 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Synopsis

    nothing, the soviets would have handled it

    Not how justice works, that's how you get more sneak attacks. Just like the kid that never stands up to a bully the cycle will never end. Retaliation is the only way to show you're not to be messed with.

  • May 16, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    The Darkest Angel

    Not how justice works, that's how you get more sneak attacks. Just like the kid that never stands up to a bully the cycle will never end. Retaliation is the only way to show you're not to be messed with.

    Lmfao are you f***ing dumb

1
...
5
6
7