Go back to your original point, you've moved the goalposts here.
Did any of the allies even know about Unit 731 for starters, did it play a role in the US dropping Fatboy and Little man? You can't retroactively start justifying war crimes.
Assuming they had zero additional intelligence, they knew that Japan had expressed interest in developing biological weapons prior to the war and that they had used chemical weapons in China.
It would be hard to say that it didn’t play any factor in dropping the atomic bombs given the sort of arms race happening during the war. We know that the fear of retaliation via WMDs was a deterrent for Japan using biological weapons on the west coast.
cmon man, its not personal, after their invention nukes were gonna be dropped at least once, because the scale of destruction is beyond incomprehensible
at the very least it was used on at the time nazi sypathsers (and a lot of innocents of course) instead of another context
doesnt make it ok, but its not the worst case scenario
I'm just pointing out how I don't think citizens of North America would think the same way if the same atrocity had been put onto their ancestors.
That's all.
Point I'm getting at is the possibility of a war on what would be fought on two fronts would have guaranteed Japan's surrender without having to resort to the carpet bombing or nukes. Pretty sure Japan would have surrender even before the Soviets declared war so the peace process wouldn't involve the Soviets.
Ah ok fair enough then
Imagine caring so much about some random ktt posters opinions that you have to put a disclaimer in op
“Using a nuke would show the world not to use it again”
Would have been better if it just never happened lmfao
Imo now that i’ve read this , a nuke would have definitely been dropped during the cold war. or i should say a nuke is what sparked a cold war from even existing in our timeline. sounds crazy but
Either way it was f***ed, Japan were willing to take a conditional surrender, then America dropped a nuke over civilians.
"Conditional surrender" is just another way to say "please no consequences even though we attacked you first"
its crazy because if japan or any other country had done this to the US or Canada i dont think yall would be posting about how you understand it was a necessary evil that a bunch of innocents were vaporized
Context matters, if we surprised attack Japan first it'd be hard to argue against. Japan killed innocent people at pearl harbor so why should the US not return the favor
Only americans think dropping literal nukes on civilians is ever justifiable dine
why are they arguing this is beyond me
Years and generations of families getting cancer and are born with birth defects but people itt are still justifying this I'm crying
also its so funny that only users with drake avis and known drake stans are defending this itt
that certified neoliberal boy meme was right
why are they arguing this is beyond me
People wanna play devil’s advocates so bad with that “ground warfare would’ve been even worse!” s*** lmao
Context matters, if we surprised attack Japan first it'd be hard to argue against. Japan killed innocent people at pearl harbor so why should the US not return the favor
We lost 2,403 people at Pearl Harbor
They lost 200,000+ people and a generation of survivors were left with a higher risk of cancer and birth defects
That's not really "returning the favor"
People wanna play devil’s advocates so bad with that “ground warfare would’ve been even worse!” s*** lmao
Ok so let's say no bombs
What should the US do? The ground invasion argument is backed up by the math, on paper more people die so that's even more tragic
We lost 2,403 people at Pearl Harbor
They lost 200,000+ people and a generation of survivors were left with a higher risk of cancer and birth defects
That's not really "returning the favor"
I know but when we look at the full picture then it's still the Emperor's and military leaders fault for attacking Pearl Harbor knowing it was a bad idea
Ok so let's say no bombs
What should the US do? The ground invasion argument is backed up by the math, on paper more people die so that's even more tragic
F*** should I know 😂 i don’t know enough about it, I just know that the US military doesn’t pick the best solutions to problems 🤷♂️
Ok so let's say no bombs
What should the US do? The ground invasion argument is backed up by the math, on paper more people die so that's even more tragic
nothing, the soviets would have handled it
"Conditional surrender" is just another way to say "please no consequences even though we attacked you first"
The condition was more or less let the emperor be, which happened anyway. Japan got a great conditions upon surrendering.
You're just trying to justify the unjustifiable
Context matters, if we surprised attack Japan first it'd be hard to argue against. Japan killed innocent people at pearl harbor so why should the US not return the favor
Dafuq is wrong with you
Ok so let's say no bombs
What should the US do? The ground invasion argument is backed up by the math, on paper more people die so that's even more tragic
Ground invasion wouldn't have been necessary, Japan weren't weren't willing to fight a way on two fronts, with the Russian prepping to declare war on Japan.
nothing, the soviets would have handled it
Crazy how happy people are with pretending Japan were five with prolonging the way with the Soviets ready to declare war.
Japan knew the war was lost, and def didn't want the Soviets to declare war so they'd have to answer to them as well when they were forced into submission.
nothing, the soviets would have handled it
Not how justice works, that's how you get more sneak attacks. Just like the kid that never stands up to a bully the cycle will never end. Retaliation is the only way to show you're not to be messed with.