Dec 8, 2019·1 reply
Alexso
let me explain why this isn’t a valid argument
We have cases of current adults who go into a coma. They are in a vegetative state and are not able to think.
We also have cases of people coming out of comas.
So with that being said. Do you think we shouldn’t have compassion or respect the autonomy of those people as well? Should we have the right to kill them even though it’s a potential life? Because they can come out of a coma.
well technically people in comas have at least had the ability to form thoughts before and posses some sort of flow of consciousness.
Dec 8, 2019i think overall it should be up to the woman. s***s gonna be in her body. But it does get complicated when both parents are in agreement with what to do because i do think the guy should have some say in the matter
rvi ⚡Dec 8, 2019·1 replyAlexNo man
Cause they’re both potential lives
Is my point
They’re both not able to feel
they’re both not “sentient”
they’re both not able to consent to anything being done to them
They’re both POTENTIAL LIVESYet we can’t kill one and the other we can
That’s the point
do you eat meat?
- Dec 8, 2019rvi
do you eat meat?
pause
- Dec 8, 2019107wildboy
well technically people in comas have at least had the ability to form thoughts before and posses some sort of flow of consciousness.
that doesn’t make them less of a life bro
Dec 8, 2019·1 replyAlexNo man
Cause they’re both potential lives
Is my point
They’re both not able to feel
they’re both not “sentient”
they’re both not able to consent to anything being done to them
They’re both POTENTIAL LIVESYet we can’t kill one and the other we can
That’s the point
A person in a coma isn't a "potential life" it is a life
- Dec 8, 2019
Let me be clear
I love all of you whether we disagree or not
I’m just saying
Look your other side of the argument up as well
You might be surprised what you find
Ellinia 🍰Dec 8, 2019·1 replyAlexunwanted by parents =/= murdered
Tf is that even supposed to mean. Obviously one is the root of the problem and the other the solution. You're not really saying much here.
You call it murder because you consider it to be alive but not everyone does.
Dec 8, 2019·1 reply
Indicudwhy’s it illegal to kill yourself if abortion is legal
Generally speaking, suicide is not illegal. There are still places where it’s technically illegal because it’s still killing a person (which is illegal obv) but it’s treated as a mental illness rather than a crime and rarely prosecuted.
Assisting or encouraging suicide still illegal tho.
- Dec 8, 2019·1 replysoapmanwun
A person in a coma isn't a "potential life" it is a life
So what’s the difference
man I can’t keep trying I’m gonna develop arthritis lmao
- Dec 8, 2019·2 repliesEllinia
Tf is that even supposed to mean. Obviously one is the root of the problem and the other the solution. You're not really saying much here.
You call it murder because you consider it to be alive but not everyone does.the difference is I’m using science to make my stance you’re using opinions
Dec 8, 2019·1 replyAlexAll this compassion for the pregnant women but not for the baby who’s going to be murdered
Lmao
just say you hate women and move on
Dec 8, 2019we got 8 billion people in the world, no point in bringing in more if the parents don't want em.
pro life niggas will march and protest all day but never hit up an orphanage and support those kids.
pathetic.
- Dec 8, 2019·1 replyTyler
just say you hate women and move on
attack my character
I disagree with you I must be a woman hating piece of s***
Ahh Classic
- Dec 8, 2019Alex
So what’s the difference
man I can’t keep trying I’m gonna develop arthritis lmao
One is a person with rights and the other can't be a person with rights because they don't exist yet
- Dec 8, 2019·1 replyAlex
attack my character
I disagree with you I must be a woman hating piece of s***
Ahh Classic
Plenty of people disagree with me. You care more about an embryo than an actual womans life, so yes.
- Ellinia 🍰Dec 8, 2019Alex
the difference is I’m using science to make my stance you’re using opinions
Sure. And science has never been used to justify acts of cruelty on humans
- Dec 8, 2019
killin babies
- Dec 8, 2019·2 repliesTyler
Plenty of people disagree with me. You care more about an embryo than an actual womans life, so yes.
I’ll just end it with this
It is a very dangerous precedent to suggest that human beings have the subjective capacity to define as life that which they wish to preserve
Think about that.
- rvi ⚡Dec 8, 2019·1 replyAlex
I’ll just end it with this
It is a very dangerous precedent to suggest that human beings have the subjective capacity to define as life that which they wish to preserve
Think about that.
can you just answer my question as to why a human life is so much more important than an animal life? does it bother you that human beings had the subjective capacity to decide its ok to kill them?
- Dec 8, 2019rvi
can you just answer my question as to why a human life is so much more important than an animal life? does it bother you that human beings had the subjective capacity to decide its ok to kill them?
my bad
Meant to respond
I haven’t done much research on this to comment honestly
I do see what you’re saying and when I actually have a stance on this you’ll be the first to know
- Dec 8, 2019·2 repliesAlex
I’ll just end it with this
It is a very dangerous precedent to suggest that human beings have the subjective capacity to define as life that which they wish to preserve
Think about that.
It's pretty objective actually
When someone is born they have the capacity to interact with this world however they please and thus deserve rights to ensure they can safely do so
A fetus in the womb is still apart of its mother, the mom is its world, and she being a person with rights deserves the right to abort if she wants to
Dec 8, 2019Niggas is really pro-life in the Gregorian calendar year 2019, very soon to be 2020...
- Dec 8, 2019·1 replysoapmanwun
It's pretty objective actually
When someone is born they have the capacity to interact with this world however they please and thus deserve rights to ensure they can safely do so
A fetus in the womb is still apart of its mother, the mom is its world, and she being a person with rights deserves the right to abort if she wants to
watch when you get a chance
Dec 8, 2019·2 repliessoapmanwunIt's pretty objective actually
When someone is born they have the capacity to interact with this world however they please and thus deserve rights to ensure they can safely do so
A fetus in the womb is still apart of its mother, the mom is its world, and she being a person with rights deserves the right to abort if she wants to
Hard to say a newborn baby has the “capacity to interact with the world however they please”. Unborn babies and newborns both have a very limited ability to do this.
