Kylie Jenner is hot and Tom Cruise is cool. Jeff Bezos is neither of those things, that's why I hate him and love the other two
Also socialism doesnt mean "lol everyone earns the same" like some kindergarten kid's understanding
Also socialism doesnt mean "lol everyone earns the same" like some kindergarten kid's understanding
"so you're telling me a janitor should make as much as a brain surgeon "
Socialists stanning mega millionaire entertainers and athletes will never not be cringe
gtfouttahere
Yeah man
Jaden Smith is the pinnacle of art and creativity
It doesnt matter if you like him or not its still something creative lmao
People posting that entertainers do not exploit people...
Lmaooo, what? Do you people not know how this works?
Who has Zaytoven ever exploited
Ill wait
Who has Zaytoven ever exploited
Ill wait
Who makes the tools Zaytoven uses to create his music? The infrastructure?
What do you guys think this is?
"Ill wait"
The entire supply chain and infrastructure used to make and distribute products is exploitation.
And Im saying this because this exploitation argument is a dumb
If you can extract more money from rich people then go ahead. I am not finna argue about how someone working some s*** job at Amazon is being exploited because you need to make money to survive
Also she’s def an entertainer first lol
Eh, her parents decided she would entertain people as a kid (as is the case with a lot of entertainers). She's not really in the public eye as an adult aside from ig
"so you're telling me a janitor should make as much as a brain surgeon "
I’ve seen y’all especially synopsis saying janitors should be allowed to make business decisions
I’ve seen y’all especially synopsis saying janitors should be allowed to make business decisions
They vote on decisions and delegate. If it is about cleaning then the janitor knows more about it than we do. Really not that complex.
I’ve seen y’all especially synopsis saying janitors should be allowed to make business decisions
Bro said "If its about cleaning then the Janitors know best" as if its a trade job with formal cleaning training at trade school
If someone is making decisions about the cleaning of an institute its because their are regulations set on a national standard.
Not because the confederate of Jannies said to clean X in a certain way
Bro said "If its about cleaning then the Janitors know best" as if its a trade job with formal cleaning training at trade school
If someone is making decisions about the cleaning of an institute its because their are regulations set on a national standard.
Not because the confederate of Jannies said to clean X in a certain way
I promise you if you left it up to them they wouldn’t wanna clean s*** 🤣 I def wouldn’t want to
I promise you if you left it up to them they wouldn’t wanna clean s*** 🤣 I def wouldn’t want to
For real, bro really responded to that.
Nobody wants to be a Janitor. A normal person would have ignored that s***.
Custodial work is the s*** you do when you are working to survive.
Yeah bro, Im happy to mop floors, clean piss and s*** now because I got to decide how I clean..
What does that even mean? What are the multitudes of cleaning options available that a Janitor would be prohibited from doing?
most entertainers wealth is tied up in assets and even their personal spending money is often deducted from revenue/advances when there isnt enough profit (before tour / years after touring)
business owners that see major profits that are also publicly reported are so much more susceptible to being targetted for their wealth for one reason alone, large amounts of people actually know they have the surplus money
I’ve seen y’all especially synopsis saying janitors should be allowed to make business decisions
That's not the same as earning the same stoopid
If anything Kylie isn’t a entertainer at all but she is a rich businessman
she's a product of nepotism and a social media star
most entertainers wealth is tied up in assets and even their personal spending money is often deducted from revenue/advances when there isnt enough profit (before tour / years after touring)
business owners that see major profits that are also publicly reported are so much more susceptible to being targetted for their wealth for one reason alone, large amounts of people actually know they have the surplus money
Isn't it the opposite? Entertainers make pretty much only cash from sponsors, label deals, album sales, salary (for sports stars), etc. They don't get paid in assets like stocks.
Meanwhile a CEO's wealth largely comes from their company stock and how it increases in value. Obviously they often get big bonuses at the end of the year, but their actual salaries aren't that crazy, so their wealth is mostly wrapped up in assets compared to entertainers
Who makes the tools Zaytoven uses to create his music? The infrastructure?
What do you guys think this is?
"Ill wait"
The entire supply chain and infrastructure used to make and distribute products is exploitation.
And Im saying this because this exploitation argument is a dumb
If you can extract more money from rich people then go ahead. I am not finna argue about how someone working some s*** job at Amazon is being exploited because you need to make money to survive
Just watch a marxist 101 video on youtube if you're too lazy to read
Doesn't hurt to understand other ideologies even if u dont agree w them
Isn't it the opposite? Entertainers make pretty much only cash from sponsors, label deals, album sales, salary (for sports stars), etc. They don't get paid in assets like stocks.
Meanwhile a CEO's wealth largely comes from their company stock and how it increases in value. Obviously they often get big bonuses at the end of the year, but their actual salaries aren't that crazy, so their wealth is mostly wrapped up in assets compared to entertainers
well u are right in a sense
as Ye says, at a higher level (celebrity) entertainers are often advised and even coerced into buying material assets such as cars, boats, planes, houses, jewelry, other property, startup businesses or investing in others
but there is a smaller amount of those entertainers than people understand, when really there are plenty, plenty more rich nobodies from general business ventures, each one with cash to spare to help save the planet
its less about them doing inevitable developments of technology (EV cars or shopping apps) and far more about the resources they exploit in the name of furthering their own power.
Humanity doesn't NEED amazon. Humanity especially doesn't NEED electric personal vehicles, considering our still present reliance on fossil fuels. Those are luxury goods in the grand scheme of things
what actually should be "done" for humanity is the provision of infrastructure, social progress, and true ownership, not only over the matters of their country in the name of democracy, but of their workplace over the value they clock in to create every day
But people like Musk and Bezos don't want that because it limits their own power
We kinda do need EVs though to reduce emissions
At the very least all public transpo should be electric and EVs should be affordable for everyone
Tesla doesnt need to have a monopoly on EVs but to say we dont need them entirely is just silly
We kinda do need EVs though to reduce emissions
At the very least all public transpo should be electric and EVs should be affordable for everyone
Tesla doesnt need to have a monopoly on EVs but to say we dont need them entirely is just silly
The thing is that road transport “only” accounts for 12% of our entire global footprint. Rather than a simple transition to a primarily EV privacy transport fleet, we need to realign transportation and travel as a whole to focus on foot traffic, bike, and public transportation while leaving cars as a secondary or even tertiary means of travel
This eliminates the massive footprint left by asphalt and concrete, reduces our volume footprint as we create smaller and more efficient spaces, and fosters public, social, and productive mindsets in populations
EV in and of itself is not the answer but only a small element of it