4:29
!https://youtu.be/KkHnFJu6cFQ?si=dC_-CakarXlvJ2ZjHe asked a woman to get naked and brought Hawk to her? What a strange guy
Lmao ur acting like this was the Armenian genocide and there are people who are still alive having their rightful homes taken from them
This is six millennia of theological history. The people who lost their rightful homes in Israel aren’t the same people who are actively claiming the land belongs to them.
There are Palestinians who have directly traced the names of their lineage back a whole millennium. Nonjewish people and people whose ancestors that converted from Judaism have existed there at the same time, before, and after Hewish people. We are talking about the displacing of still-living people with intricate and deep ties to the land, culture, and society for the sake of a bunch of crackers claiming a theological right and citing ancestral connections to said land that they cannot express without the cruel disrespect they’ve displayed towards said land.
I’m not saying Jewish people don’t have a right to live in their homeland. I’m saying that the European phenomenon of Zionism is not partaking in any justified or moral or righteous effort in expressing the Jewish presence in Palestine. They are colonialist, apartheid-forming, undemocratic, and ethnosupremacist
You are basically saying that because jewish people were displaced 2000 years ago they have since lost their right to the land.
Then there is some pretty racist statements refering to jewish people as crackers and further condescending them for having lived in europe after being displaced. You are definitely being racist here, and this just further highlights why this conflict continues to rage on, pure ignorance and intolerance from both sides.
To address the first part of the argument, it doesnt seem to matter how much time has past, since a group is displaced or an area colonized, in other instances, so why should it matter here?
For example, if i was to say, "native americans, you gave up your right to these lands since you were colonized fair and square hundreds of years ago, stop whining and accept your place"
This just wouldnt fly, but it is essentially what you are saying, except that native americans were not forced from their traditional territories to the same extend as jewish people..though they have definitely been displaced in some cases.
So i just dont buy this argument as a good reason why jewish people dont have a claim to israel
You are basically saying that because jewish people were displaced 2000 years ago they have since lost their right to the land.
Then there is some pretty racist statements refering to jewish people as crackers and further condescending them for having lived in europe after being displaced. You are definitely being racist here, and this just further highlights why this conflict continues to rage on, pure ignorance and intolerance from both sides.
To address the first part of the argument, it doesnt seem to matter how much time has past, since a group is displaced or an area colonized, in other instances, so why should it matter here?
For example, if i was to say, "native americans, you gave up your right to these lands since you were colonized fair and square hundreds of years ago, stop whining and accept your place"
This just wouldnt fly, but it is essentially what you are saying, except that native americans were not forced from their traditional territories to the same extend as jewish people..though they have definitely been displaced in some cases.
So i just dont buy this argument as a good reason why jewish people dont have a claim to israel
I’ve come to understand that I’m talking to a brick wall who doesn’t converse in good faith i hope your day sucks
I’ve come to understand that I’m talking to a brick wall who doesn’t converse in good faith i hope your day sucks
I felt like it was a reasonable discussion. Unfortunate that you have to end it this way with bad feelings.
We just dont agree here, i understand your argument but i dont agree with it.
I dont think jews have a right to genocide palestinians however, and there is plenty wrong with their tactics.
I felt like it was a reasonable discussion. Unfortunate that you have to end it this way with bad feelings.
We just dont agree here, i understand your argument but i dont agree with it.
I dont think jews have a right to genocide palestinians however, and there is plenty wrong with their tactics.
You believe they have an innate claim to Israel that others don’t possess. How else would this claim be enforced without violence and genocide?
You believe they have an innate claim to Israel that others don’t possess. How else would this claim be enforced without violence and genocide?
No, i dont think others dont possess it. I never said that.
Others do possess it as well.
Therein lies the problem. These groups need to figure out a way to live in peace on the same lands. I dont know the solution, but a two state system seems necessary
No, i dont think others dont possess it. I never said that.
Others do possess it as well.
Therein lies the problem. These groups need to figure out a way to live in peace on the same lands. I dont know the solution, but a two state system seems necessary
Which is, once again, the exact thing that the current society and government of Israel don’t want. Any Palestinian declination on a proposal was on the grounds that the terms specifically detracted from the nature of a two state solution in favor of Israeli control over the territory
No, i dont think others dont possess it. I never said that.
Others do possess it as well.
Therein lies the problem. These groups need to figure out a way to live in peace on the same lands. I dont know the solution, but a two state system seems necessary
As I mentioned earlier, a two state solution will never be possible because it is impossible to negotiate something fair with an oppressive colonizer entity. It does not happen. And that's before we even get into that entity being backed and supported by other world powers.
He asked a woman to get naked and brought Hawk to her? What a strange guy
Have u seen the blurred lines video? I’m not a prude but this s*** is creepy
Which is, once again, the exact thing that the current society and government of Israel don’t want. Any Palestinian declination on a proposal was on the grounds that the terms specifically detracted from the nature of a two state solution in favor of Israeli control over the territory
Well then israel is wrong for not wanting that.
My understanding of the conflict is that palestine would not settle for two states because they refused to recognize israel and wanted the the whole area in the early days.
Now things have definitely changed and israel seems to be the one unwilling to compromise
Have u seen the blurred lines video? I’m not a prude but this s*** is creepy
Posts like this make me realise some people on this forum were crazy young in 2013
Well then israel is wrong for not wanting that.
My understanding of the conflict is that palestine would not settle for two states because they refused to recognize israel and wanted the the whole area in the early days.
Now things have definitely changed and israel seems to be the one unwilling to compromise
You been living under a rock or something?
Did you spend any time talking to Palestinians when you were in the area ?
Ayo @op lowkey we need a answer for this
Well then israel is wrong for not wanting that.
My understanding of the conflict is that palestine would not settle for two states because they refused to recognize israel and wanted the the whole area in the early days.
Now things have definitely changed and israel seems to be the one unwilling to compromise
And I think both of those times in history shows the reality of Israel in its intent to establish an ethnosupremacy in the land. Palestine was always polyethnic and Israel was always not. There’s really no time where Palestine was forcing their hand in the larger scheme of geopolitics. It’s been a continuous and encroaching violation of self determination, since the 1912 Balfour Declaration
Probably already mentioned in 7 pages but didn't he do Kelis also like really dirty?
Probably already mentioned in 7 pages but didn't he do Kelis also like really dirty?
Yes
Ayo @op lowkey we need a answer for this
I spoke to some palestinians but not really about the conflict. I never went to palestine. I did read several books on the conflict and have done my own research, but most of the story i recieved while in israel was from jewish israelis.
Im aware that there is bias here, obviously. Its just like anything else, you need to here both sides of the story.
So why arent yall on here willing to listen to israelis? There is a strong hivemind apparently on ktt about this issue
And I think both of those times in history shows the reality of Israel in its intent to establish an ethnosupremacy in the land. Palestine was always polyethnic and Israel was always not. There’s really no time where Palestine was forcing their hand in the larger scheme of geopolitics. It’s been a continuous and encroaching violation of self determination, since the 1912 Balfour Declaration
Its true that israel has always wanted to be seperate from palestine, and its also true that there is a strong sense of nationalism ane ethnosuperiority there, but palestinians are often similarly intolerant, dont you think?