Thread was locked by
a moderator
  • Jan 16, 2020
  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    edited
    Scratchin Mamba

    Bernie is able to get a lot of relatively uninformed people who would normally support Trump on his side. You're delusional if you think the "Bernie bros" who self-identify as progressives are the ones that voted for Trump.

    I literally watched Bernie Bots like Synopsis basically campaign for Trump as it was unfolding lmao People were actually convinced that Hillary was worse than Donald Trump

    Turning ideologues bitter was a major point for propagandists, and it worked

    There are STILL people trying to say that DWS sending mean emails was “rigging” the election that Bernie lost by 3,000,000 votes out of one side of their mouth, while saying that a years long propaganda campaign by a world powers intelligence could not have possibly affected an election that was stolen from someone who earned 3,000,000 more votes by half-points in a few states that add up to less than 100,000.

  • Jan 16, 2020
    Scratchin Mamba

    Hillary's record is already enough of a smear campaign, don't need any Russian bots for that.

    Right lol.

    But nope it was all the Russians

  • Jan 16, 2020

    It’s so easy to tell how wrong people are just by how b****y they get when talking about this

    It’s never just about acknowledging that Russia clearly and successfully interfered in the election, you guys get all worked up like a bad liar “oh my god yeah it was totally ALL Russia guys!!”

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    Hillary's record is already enough of a smear campaign, don't need any Russian bots for that.

    This is a really impotent way of saying it happened but you’re okay with it

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Buckleys Angel

    This is a really impotent way of saying it happened but you’re okay with it

    The online smear campaign didn't happen and it didn't need to happen is what I'm saying.

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    The online smear campaign didn't happen and it didn't need to happen is what I'm saying.

    The online smear campaign objectively happened...

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Buckleys Angel

    The online smear campaign objectively happened...

    Nah not really but I don't rly feel like arguing about this in 2020 bro

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    However if Russia leaked those emails they're objectively real as f*** for that

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    Nah not really but I don't rly feel like arguing about this in 2020 bro

    Lol there is no “not really”. This is something that objectively happened and is still happening

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Buckleys Angel

    Lol there is no “not really”. This is something that objectively happened and is still happening

    Lol you're saying Russia is still smearing Hillary?

  • Jan 16, 2020
    Scratchin Mamba

    However if Russia leaked those emails they're objectively real as f*** for that

    It sure conveniently gave people like you an excuse to act s***ty and say that mean emails from Debbie cost Bernie 3,000,000 votes in the primary, while also saying an active propaganda campaign from Russia could never affect 70,000 voters across 3 states in the general.

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    Lol you're saying Russia is still smearing Hillary?

    How is it that you can’t get through 2 consecutive posts without being a facetious ass and putting words in someone’s mouth?

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Buckleys Angel

    How is it that you can’t get through 2 consecutive posts without being a facetious ass and putting words in someone’s mouth?

    My guy you said Russia ran an online smear campaign against Hillary, next post you said it's still going on today

    If that's not what you mean just clarify what you mean instead of trying to be funny

  • Jan 16, 2020

    Here's a nonfictional Russiagate for the libs out there

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    My guy you said Russia ran an online smear campaign against Hillary, next post you said it's still going on today

    If that's not what you mean just clarify what you mean instead of trying to be funny

    Im not trying to be funny at all lmao

    I have literally had entire discussions with you w he re your only input was facetious questions misrepresenting what I said or strawmanning

    Obviously they aren’t smearing Hillary anymore, but they are pretty openly trying to influence the 2020 election

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Oh... we have reached to “well.... SO! America did it!” portion of the discussion where you backtrack and try to justify what you previously said didnt happen.

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Buckleys Angel

    Im not trying to be funny at all lmao

    I have literally had entire discussions with you w he re your only input was facetious questions misrepresenting what I said or strawmanning

    Obviously they aren’t smearing Hillary anymore, but they are pretty openly trying to influence the 2020 election

    I based my conclusions on the legitimacy of Russiagate on studies that were done on it, even during our discussions, so that's just not true

    And how are they influencing these elections then, who are they rooting for this time according to you

  • Jan 16, 2020
    Buckleys Angel

    Oh... we have reached to “well.... SO! America did it!” portion of the discussion where you backtrack and try to justify what you previously said didnt happen.

    Never said it happened buddy

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    I based my conclusions on the legitimacy of Russiagate on studies that were done on it, even during our discussions, so that's just not true

    And how are they influencing these elections then, who are they rooting for this time according to you

    There was already a ton of botnet activity supporting Tulsi because her foreign policy positions incidentally benefit Russia and she was willing to start conflict with stronger establishment candidates.

    Same reason she got so much far-right support.

  • Jan 16, 2020

    I’d say they’re rooting on Biden squeaking out an ugly primary because they know they can divisively get a large portion of the electorate to not vote for him.

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    However if you do believe in Russiagate ( ), there really is no other way to look at it than a case of a rabid dog biting his owner. The leaders of the post-USSR Russian regime were helped brought to power by the US and helped kept in power by the US. Putin just turned out to not be as much of a kuck as Yeltsin, it's called blowback

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Buckleys Angel

    There was already a ton of botnet activity supporting Tulsi because her foreign policy positions incidentally benefit Russia and she was willing to start conflict with stronger establishment candidates.

    Same reason she got so much far-right support.

    Any evidence for that? Are they also supporting Bernie because his foreign policy also benfits Russia?

  • Jan 16, 2020
    Scratchin Mamba

    However if you do believe in Russiagate ( ), there really is no other way to look at it than a case of a rabid dog biting his owner. The leaders of the post-USSR Russian regime were helped brought to power by the US and helped kept in power by the US. Putin just turned out to not be as much of a kuck as Yeltsin, it's called blowback

    I think this is the first completely honest thing I’ve seen you say

  • Jan 16, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Hillizabeth Warton!

Thread was locked by
a moderator