It was pretty small bore but some of the body horror is great.
Also, it's definitely folk horror. It's just not pagan. It's abrahamic.
It alludes fairly hard to pagan I thought?
It alludes fairly hard to pagan I thought?
I mean there's the vagrant and sculpted imagery but it felt- idk- Wickerman s***? Not much to it in itself. That stuff is all Christian anxiety anyway and the film is clearly about western misogyny with organized religion in the plot. Honestly giving this film very much specific meaning feels misguided anyway. It's so general. The title says it all. The pagan is interchangeable with the priest
It's the first A24 film that reminded me more of Blumhouse...
I mean there's the vagrant and sculpted imagery but it felt- idk- Wickerman s***? Not much to it in itself. That stuff is all Christian anxiety anyway and the film is clearly about western misogyny with organized religion in the plot. Honestly giving this film very much specific meaning feels misguided anyway. It's so general. The title says it all. The pagan is interchangeable with the priest
It's the first A24 film that reminded me more of Blumhouse...
That's a pretty good comparison, I guess I just wish Garland leaned into that. For example, the friend doesn't arrive until the film is over, we should have seen her either be killed or save Buckleys character, or something interesting instead she's just comic relief/a plot device for flashbacks
That's a pretty good comparison, I guess I just wish Garland leaned into that. For example, the friend doesn't arrive until the film is over, we should have seen her either be killed or save Buckleys character, or something interesting instead she's just comic relief/a plot device for flashbacks
The real problem imo is that the film stops as soon as the protag/antag reach a new understanding which would've been something to explore. Ya know what if she did mortally wound that thing and then have to care for it or nurse it back to health or whatever. There are more interesting things to do with this premise than cat and mouse thrills. Also the film is surreal in its content but not it's form which is disappointing. It's just not weird or nebulous enough
The real problem imo is that the film stops as soon as the protag/antag reach a new understanding which would've been something to explore. Ya know what if she did mortally wound that thing and then have to care for it or nurse it back to health or whatever. There are more interesting things to do with this premise than cat and mouse thrills. Also the film is surreal in its content but not it's form which is disappointing. It's just not weird or nebulous enough
I agree about the form and content; for me it all comes back to Garland not being a good director he can write scripts and make passable aesthetics but not put the whole package together
I agree about the form and content; for me it all comes back to Garland not being a good director he can write scripts and make passable aesthetics but not put the whole package together
Annihilation might be his best movie and he didn't write that stuff. It's not exactly like the book though. Idk, I don't think Men is bad but it does feel like less than the sum of its parts and is already missing that something extra. Hope he rebounds
F*** me that was dense.
Flabberghasted is the only way to say it.
I liked it, definitely f***ing bizarre, and there is a lot to talk about for sure.
Edit: ill be back with... something. sometime. too much to dissect
Annihilation might be his best movie and he didn't write that stuff. It's not exactly like the book though. Idk, I don't think Men is bad but it does feel like less than the sum of its parts and is already missing that something extra. Hope he rebounds
Annihilation he used a first draft of the book apparently, which is why it was different
This looks like a parody of an A24 flick
this was my major gripe with the film
Annihilation he used a first draft of the book apparently, which is why it was different
Whole trilogy is really good. Highly recommended
Greatest horror movie for me . Potent ending that in many ways does what Midsommar didn’t for me
The real problem imo is that the film stops as soon as the protag/antag reach a new understanding which would've been something to explore. Ya know what if she did mortally wound that thing and then have to care for it or nurse it back to health or whatever. There are more interesting things to do with this premise than cat and mouse thrills. Also the film is surreal in its content but not it's form which is disappointing. It's just not weird or nebulous enough
I think some of you should rewatch @SegaDreamFlash
I mean there's the vagrant and sculpted imagery but it felt- idk- Wickerman s***? Not much to it in itself. That stuff is all Christian anxiety anyway and the film is clearly about western misogyny with organized religion in the plot. Honestly giving this film very much specific meaning feels misguided anyway. It's so general. The title says it all. The pagan is interchangeable with the priest
It's the first A24 film that reminded me more of Blumhouse...
LMFAOOOOOOO
dawg this movie was way too weird for me, thought the first act was strong but the ending.. wtf
Ending was fire
I see this getting the Twin Peaks Fire Walk With Me treatment where people look back at it a decade or two from now with new eyes (This is not me comparing those two movies)
yea this was interesting, definitely need another rewatch to unpack everything. rory kinnear & jessie buckley both killed it, especially rory. guy has range i didn’t expect at all haha
not sure i enjoyed this as much as his first two films but it’s still solid as hell, lots of great s*** in here