Im surprised people still dont know that pitchfork scores are an average from multiple people's scores and not the actual reviewer
whats the point of criticism if you're obligated to appreciate 'structure and presentation' of every piece of craft. whos to say which piece of craft has/doesnt have it. whats the point of applying critical lens to it if everything has 'value' of some kind? just staying at the margins?
all criticism is ultimately subjective and some folk can articulate it and thats all there is to it. yes in the revolution we'll line up all the critics and intellectuals yadda yadda yadda. that aint this
at some point i really got to know who they write some of those rock magazine reviews for. every single album up in there is 8/10 from acdc to we butter the bread with butter. i couldnt for the life of me understand why is that, but really i know
He eats Subway like me!
https://twitter.com/Southside_Gunn/status/1943565141699641769what am i supposed to take out of this. number one franchise in the world. twitter is f***ing stupid man
what am i supposed to take out of this. number one franchise in the world. twitter is f***ing stupid man
That he eats fresh and has good opinions.
Im surprised people still dont know that pitchfork scores are an average from multiple people's scores and not the actual reviewer
Surely there still is some sort of linkage between the review and the score and he has the ownership, as a writer, in the end
What’s the point of a review if it isn’t personal taste, it’s opinion not journalism
This the same dude who came in here sucking off drake during the beef lmao.
But f*** thought crimez too while we at it
This the same dude who came in here sucking off drake during the beef lmao.
But f*** thought crimez too while we at it
damn what they do?
Surely there still is some sort of linkage between the review and the score and he has the ownership, as a writer, in the end
Pitchfork owns his copyright, he don’t own s*** unless he made a private blog
Surely there still is some sort of linkage between the review and the score and he has the ownership, as a writer, in the end
Yeah they choose whose opinion best went with the score.
But this was back in the day when they had more employees idk bout now
at some point i really got to know who they write some of those rock magazine reviews for. every single album up in there is 8/10 from acdc to we butter the bread with butter. i couldnt for the life of me understand why is that, but really i know
category 1: white. automatic 6
and then they go from there. seems the more eclectic, the higher the score
He eats Subway like me!
https://twitter.com/Southside_Gunn/status/1943565141699641769Ight I'm not f***ing with this tweet
I expect this type s*** from a Swiftie
Alphonse pierre pissing off stupid people like it’s his day job as usual. Modern day pauline kael
Whenever I see a tweet like this I never see any reasoning or explanation given as to why a sexyy red album is inherently worse than a clipse album and cannot possibly be rated higher for any reason (or whichever artists are being compared)
Honestly I'd give the album a 7 or a 7.5 at best. I can see someone giving the album a 6.5 if they don't have that much nostalgia for the Clipse
He eats Subway like me!
https://twitter.com/Southside_Gunn/status/1943565141699641769Lol, an average guy, probably done in his life as much gangsta s*** as Pusha T and No Malice