Reply
  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply

    labeling two continents worth of ethnicities a name that was specifically constructed out of an outdated science to dilute the equally diverse continent of Africa (done to justify slavery and colonialism) is pretty dis-intuitive @op

    sure the two demographics were just about equal in their exploitation under the white, Christian ethnostate of the USA, but that’s as much of a comparison that we could make in this case. Many cases of cooperation between the two exist, but there is also a lot of times when they came in conflict or even cooperated with white people against each other. Native Americans even owned slaves!

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ARCADE GOON

    There are South Asians, Polynesians, Aborigines far darker than some people who would be considered "black" in the USA. Does that mean they are the same group as black Americans?

    What's the point in all this? What do you gain from saying this stuff?

    Having dark skin by itself doesn't mean your relatively recent (~2000 years ago) ancestry was African.

    I think blacks dont get enough credit for being explorers cos the the oldest people in the filipines are dark with nappy hair and those melanesians.....they look like they from the Atl or Detroit lol
    Jk but nah being dark skinned does not make you black nor does it make you african. Ive seen indians waaaaay darker than black Africans

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    americana

    labeling two continents worth of ethnicities a name that was specifically constructed out of an outdated science to dilute the equally diverse continent of Africa (done to justify slavery and colonialism) is pretty dis-intuitive @op

    sure the two demographics were just about equal in their exploitation under the white, Christian ethnostate of the USA, but that’s as much of a comparison that we could make in this case. Many cases of cooperation between the two exist, but there is also a lot of times when they came in conflict or even cooperated with white people against each other. Native Americans even owned slaves!

    This is true. The Us govt pitted tribes against eachother & killed a lot of copper colored americans. Part of it was due to greed (manifest destiny) other part due to the Inquisition which targeted Muslims, Jews, & non Christians all around the world

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply

    Heres the rule guys: if u brown and got ancestry from Africa, you black

    Everybody else, find a new word

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Dionne

    This is true. The Us govt pitted tribes against eachother & killed a lot of copper colored americans. Part of it was due to greed (manifest destiny) other part due to the Inquisition which targeted Muslims, Jews, & non Christians all around the world

    the Inquisition was the Catholic Castillian’s refonquest and re-Christianization of the Iberian Peninsula. It didn’t affect any ideas in the US regarding religion and Native Americans

    Much of what occurred in the US was the effect of American delusion that saw them claim themselves as the rightful owners of North America in a sick twisted consequence of years of British snobbiness

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Starface

    Heres the rule guys: if u brown and got ancestry from Africa, you black

    Everybody else, find a new word

    far more complicated than that

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply

    Life started in-between Egypt/Palestine-Israel and central Iraq/Iran. Observe:

    Now, from there, the closest regions to gain humans afterwards, were the rest of Africa, Arabia, the Indus Valley (India/Pakistan), and lower China.

    Those areas are were 100% of ANCIENT civilizations are from.

    Iraq/Iran = Sumerians (5000 B.C)
    Arabia= Thamuds (3000 B.C)
    Pakistan = Harappans (7000-3000 B.C)
    India = Vedics (7000-3000 B.C)
    China = Shang (5000-3000 B.C)

    So technically, life did start in-between Africa & the Levantine (Palestine-Israel).

    Also amazing how almost 99% of all prophets in Abrahamic religions are from this area.

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply

    whats NEXT @OP, Asians were black too ? Ofcourse, African ? no, but the isolation from Polynesians/Austranesian made Pinoys kinda have dark skin (some of them)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negrito

    Also there were some theories about Native Africans reaching the new world pre-columdumb

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Columbian_trans-oceanic_contact_theories

    Also @OP we all came from Africa.

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    americana

    far more complicated than that

    Lol its not

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ALPHABEAR

    Life started in-between Egypt/Palestine-Israel and central Iraq/Iran. Observe:

    Now, from there, the closest regions to gain humans afterwards, were the rest of Africa, Arabia, the Indus Valley (India/Pakistan), and lower China.

    Those areas are were 100% of ANCIENT civilizations are from.

    Iraq/Iran = Sumerians (5000 B.C)
    Arabia= Thamuds (3000 B.C)
    Pakistan = Harappans (7000-3000 B.C)
    India = Vedics (7000-3000 B.C)
    China = Shang (5000-3000 B.C)

    So technically, life did start in-between Africa & the Levantine (Palestine-Israel).

    Also amazing how almost 99% of all prophets in Abrahamic religions are from this area.

    Civilization started in the Fertile Crescent at roughly the same time as the Indus Valley in Pakistan, but not human life which is basically concretely Subsaharran africa

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Starface

    Lol its not

    As a science and not a form of antropology, it really is, which is why race as an entire concept is useless (except for the reinforcement of power structures that are currently capitalist), and people need to completely rid themselves of it. Race changes nothing innate about any human outside of small health characteristics that are common based on geographical origin, only how society views them. I could have ancestry from Africa, what does that make me?

    Race wasn’t even a societal thing until Europeans had to find a way to justify their conquest of the Old and New World.

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Thizz

    Going off this and what I remember from California history. Most Native American groups where scattered. It was one big empire, one of the reasons it was easy for the whites to conquer.

    So assuming Africans did make it to the western land, basing it off Cubans/Dominicans/etc. they could have made it to Florida.
    With Manifest pushing natives to the West I can see how Africans who became intertwined with native Americans.

    Which is how we get darker skinned natives. But to say every native is black/dark skinned then that’s kinda too out there

    All the old books from the 1500s say the Indians (Indios) were “swarthy”, “dark complexion” “copper colored”, even “American”, according to Websters 1828 “American” meant copper colored races of America.

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    americana

    the Inquisition was the Catholic Castillian’s refonquest and re-Christianization of the Iberian Peninsula. It didn’t affect any ideas in the US regarding religion and Native Americans

    Much of what occurred in the US was the effect of American delusion that saw them claim themselves as the rightful owners of North America in a sick twisted consequence of years of British snobbiness

    They made it all the way to South America & Mexico

    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Inquisition

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Dionne

    They made it all the way to South America & Mexico

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Inquisition

    well yes but that entire course of events had less to do with enforcing control upon natives and more of the religious belief in itself. In contrast, Americans had absolutely no desire to assimilate native americans in their country which is a vastly different position to occupy

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    tomorrow volverse

    that's not really true tho. most black ppl in the U.S are here because of slavery and have the last name of a slave owner.

    i don't know where you're getting this information

    Huh?

    Reread what i said bruh

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    tomorrow volverse

    that's not really true tho. most black ppl in the U.S are here because of slavery and have the last name of a slave owner.

    i don't know where you're getting this information

    A lot of the white population of America emigrated here in the late 1800’s through 1960’s. They’ve been here nowhere nearly as long as basically every black person in America

  • Apr 13, 2021
    americana

    well yes but that entire course of events had less to do with enforcing control upon natives and more of the religious belief in itself. In contrast, Americans had absolutely no desire to assimilate native americans in their country which is a vastly different position to occupy

    reread what u said, then reread my reply so u can understand what I said

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    ARCADE GOON

    I dont think native americans would appreciate hearing african americans claim it is their ancestral land. Furthermore by claiming that black people are ancestral to the USA you are basically denying the genocide of the transatlantic slave trade happening. Why even engage in such alternative history?

  • Apr 13, 2021
    flipflops_

    whats NEXT @OP, Asians were black too ? Ofcourse, African ? no, but the isolation from Polynesians/Austranesian made Pinoys kinda have dark skin (some of them)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negrito

    Also there were some theories about Native Africans reaching the new world pre-columdumb

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Columbian_trans-oceanic_contact_theories

    Also @OP we all came from Africa.

    They are!

  • Apr 13, 2021
    flipflops_

    Too bad im not Native American. I’m American

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply

    Y’all gon learn today. I got receipts mane

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    Dionne

    All the old books from the 1500s say the Indians (Indios) were “swarthy”, “dark complexion” “copper colored”, even “American”, according to Websters 1828 “American” meant copper colored races of America.

    Okay so your against the word? Cause I can get behind That. But saying all natives are the same as people who have recent African ancestry is something else.
    White used black/negro as a way to claim power over minorities. Same way they do it with anyone who doesn’t fit there narrative. I’m sure someone can prove me wrong but I don’t think British whites have a derogatory term used against them 🤔
    Edit: or even a racist word for non poor whites/southerners 🤔

  • Apr 13, 2021
    SHAQUILLE

    I am speaking for myself. Did you read my comment? I literally said “I” and “myself”

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    americana

    As a science and not a form of antropology, it really is, which is why race as an entire concept is useless (except for the reinforcement of power structures that are currently capitalist), and people need to completely rid themselves of it. Race changes nothing innate about any human outside of small health characteristics that are common based on geographical origin, only how society views them. I could have ancestry from Africa, what does that make me?

    Race wasn’t even a societal thing until Europeans had to find a way to justify their conquest of the Old and New World.

    In the grand scheme yeah we're all related. But black just means a person of african descent. Somehow we dont get confused about who is Asian or who is European. Black is a broad word that includes the africans and the african diaspora.
    And yeah racism is 'new' comparatively speaking but people have been killing each other over ancestral lineages for thousandsss of years.

  • Apr 13, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Dionne

    Y’all gon learn today. I got receipts mane

    You walkin into target wit walmart receipts tho

1
...
3
4
5
...
16