You a merger truther too

NOOOOOOO

To you. Many of people think that they’re very well-written

It’s a money move end of the day.

Still I can see where Gunn and Safran would be coming from. Batman Pt 1 was a massive success. Doing brave and the bold with a new Batman is a risk and having two Batmen could also confuse audiences. Cleanest option financially is to just fold Pattinson into DCU.

I still think it’s the wrong move though

Abhorrently stupid is having two live-action Batman franchises running at the same time

One, it’s financially ridiculous

Two, it’s a quick way to guarantee audience fatigue in the character

You’re saying you can see where you’re coming from and you made up logic they never said

We lost jammuh

And I said that’s great I’m glad that enjoy them

That’s why I said in my opinion as in me I’m the one speaking that lanterns clears most hero content

My opinion has nothing to do with them

“Are they great writing? No”

That’s literally you speaking for everyone lmao

I mean ya it hasn’t been confirmed yet. Just inferring the logic behind what’s likely already in motion.

ion have a dog in the fight but the people saying all signs point to dcu being incentivized to merge in battinson have an extremely plausible perspective and likewise, all the people saying that that change would be stupid are also.. right lol -- but stupid has never meant s*** aint true

Are they great writing and I’m typing it when you mention those shows I mean to me this is a forum . I don’t speak for anyone else but me

Using nuanced logic on KTT

If I say

Harold’s is 10/10 chicken
Cloud atlas a classic

Im not saying that’s a universal truth im speaking solely for myself

I even throughout the conversation have said if you love it and think its its great writing thats dope

do you guys think that theres maybe the slightest chance that they didn’t really think this whole cinematic universe thing through?

Gunn is just waiting to see if Reeves can make an actual good movie this time

its giving disney star wars~sequel trilogy fr

CC is lowkey the brightest example of this

But the inferred logic vs the grown man behind the dcu addressing the fans is my issue . When I voice that people say “ shut up just let Gunn be sassy on threads as fans create schizo white board theories “

I’ve been saying this universe reeked of fraud for years

they banking on clayface doing well so they can sneaky link the connections. prob y it got greenlighted early too

Flaggs and clayfaces characterization’s seem entirely at odds with how they come off in the other related media that isn’t CC

s*** always funny to me cause when they rebooted dc comics after crisis they had many retreats where they figured out the first five or so years of story telling.

then they had a lore/continuity guy whose whole job was reading every comic script and checking it against what was happening in-universe and what they decided on that retreat.

and apparently with all of this money and all of this adoration for that specific time period in comics. apparently no one once has ever thought to do this for their cinematic universe

You make statements like they’re absolute truths though

People really took the MCU for granted like the s*** was easy or guaranteed