Mar 17·1 replyPls bring back sub $20 vinyl albums
Would be dangerous tho for the pockets
Mar 17·1 reply
crakcall of those twitter pages that are like DUA LIPA just surpassed THE BEATLES for bla bla bla are all ran by the labels btw
Kids being born today going to grow up thinking Blinding Lights, Old Town Road and Not Like Us are the biggest songs of all time and that The Beatles, MJ, Pac, Bob Marley etc...were mid tier stars
Mar 17·1 replyGodzillaMinusOneKids being born today going to grow up thinking Blinding Lights, Old Town Road and Not Like Us are the biggest songs of all time and that The Beatles, MJ, Pac, Bob Marley etc...were mid tier stars
man turn this soft nigga s*** off unc!
Mar 17mos defPls bring back sub $20 vinyl albums
Would be dangerous tho for the pockets
Like fr when i used to collect vinyl the only ones above $20s were the ones that had cool s*** in them. Now a gate fold be damn $40
- Mar 17·1 replyValentine
man turn this soft nigga s*** off unc!
"Bob Marley?!
His s*** isn't "jammin" no more, put on some Carti" 
- Mar 17GodzillaMinusOne
"Bob Marley?!
His s*** isn't "jammin" no more, put on some Carti" Bob Marley smoked MID unc!
we want homicide homicide and cocaine noise!
OPMar 17·1 replyGodzillaMinusOneAnd im still gonna see chart twitter pages and KTT members compare numbers between eras(pre and post streaming) without providing any context
Other day I saw SZA passed Thriller for most weeks on BB charts
S*** is depressing, pathetic--please forget it
crazy times we live in
Mar 17·2 repliesThis also stops artists like Taylor, trav and kanye releasing like 40 different deluxe versions of their albums mid week with 1 different bonus song on each version to run up sales. Overall this is a net positive
Mar 17billboard change rules more than they change draws
HURRY UP sab 🧔🏻Mar 18
mr get doughI’m not saying its too expensive to sell em for
But a $5 cassette should count for a sale
if you price it at that, the new sales meta will be to mass buy cassettes because they’re the cheapest
Mar 18
JPEGMAFIAI'm crying this a direct response to Drake
It's to Travis and Taylor Swift if anything. Others just followed suit.
- Mar 18
I don't get the Digital album price change. I don't think that one should have been changed. 5 dollars for a digital download is fine considering the price of streaming.
Mar 18·2 replies
Deezed
no way ts was even profitable, so what’s the point of losing money just to look like u sold a lot?
Mar 18LMFAO
- Mar 18Deezed
- Mar 18aaaaaaaaa
no way ts was even profitable, so what’s the point of losing money just to look like u sold a lot?
To win internet debates
Mar 18·2 repliesJPEGMAFIASell $$$ for like $4.99 in the middle of the first week digitally. They raised the price and said you can't do it mid week
How many physicals did he end up selling first week?
- Mar 18Ghostboypurrp
This also stops artists like Taylor, trav and kanye releasing like 40 different deluxe versions of their albums mid week with 1 different bonus song on each version to run up sales. Overall this is a net positive
At least they still can sell shirts
Mar 18Especially Taylor Swift ruins the charts for everyone
Mar 18SilasSome more billboard changes
https://twitter.com/HipHopAllDayy/status/1901720788153110539these boys cooked
- Mar 18
How often are the streaming metrics being negotioted between labels and DSPs?
With Monthly Active Users per DSP growing every year I assume they will adjust the rules gradually too, right?
Mar 18
TheFaderThis is anti-consumer. If labels want to sell their physical albums at a financial loss, then let them.
- Mar 18·1 replyaaaaaaaaa
no way ts was even profitable, so what’s the point of losing money just to look like u sold a lot?
because the title of having a #1 album can bring in more money/opportunities/etc
- Mar 18JPEGMAFIA
I'm crying this a direct response to Drake
look at this idiot
begging for likes 
Mar 18Travis Scott finna bundle his children now
