Updated Oct 28, 2021will this be another cigarette situation?
Oct 28, 2021soccerfanj· editedwill this be another cigarette situation?
Oct 28, 2021·3 replies- "Carnivore Aurelius"
- Roman bust avi
Opinion discarded
Oct 28, 2021·1 replyLol they’re fine health wise
But wireless headphones do give off extremely bad vibes fr fr
Kenig 💭Oct 28, 2021·1 replylights cigarette
Oct 28, 2021·edited·7 repliessoccerfanj· editedwill this be another cigarette situation?
I'm pretty sure this is actually legit, high RF exposure has been correlated with increased number of tumors in different animal studies. but they're gonna hide the data until we as a society can't ignore increasing cancer rates. and on top of that, the amount of technology today's people are exposed to even on average is probably very dangerous. so I don't know what can really even be done
mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8079/htm
"bstract
We investigated whether cellular phone use was associated with increased risk of tumors using a meta-analysis of case-control studies. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to July 2018. The primary outcome was the risk of tumors by cellular phone use, which was measured by pooling each odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). In a meta-analysis of 46 case-control studies, compared with never or rarely having used a cellular phone, regular use was not associated with tumor risk in the random-effects meta-analysis. However, in the subgroup meta-analysis by research group, there was a statistically significant positive association (harmful effect) in the Hardell et al. studies (OR, 1.15—95% CI, 1.00 to 1.33— n = 10), a statistically significant negative association (beneficial effect) in the INTERPHONE-related studies (case-control studies from 13 countries coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); (OR, 0.81—95% CI, 0.75 to 0.89—n = 9), and no statistically significant association in other research groups’ studies. Further, cellular phone use with cumulative call time more than 1000 h statistically significantly increased the risk of tumors. This comprehensive meta-analysis of case-control studies found evidence that linked cellular phone use to increased tumor risk"
Oct 28, 2021Having anything loud in your ear for long periods is not healthy
Oct 28, 2021Idk but I always had the feeling they’re not healthy
- Oct 28, 2021
worked it out, they’re fine for physical health but bad for spiritual health
Sticking with wired headphones 💯
Oct 28, 2021Only use my wireless at the gym
Oct 28, 2021whippet volverseI'm pretty sure this is actually legit, high RF exposure has been correlated with increased number of tumors in different animal studies. but they're gonna hide the data until we as a society can't ignore increasing cancer rates. and on top of that, the amount of technology today's people are exposed to even on average is probably very dangerous. so I don't know what can really even be done
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8079/htm
"bstract
We investigated whether cellular phone use was associated with increased risk of tumors using a meta-analysis of case-control studies. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to July 2018. The primary outcome was the risk of tumors by cellular phone use, which was measured by pooling each odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). In a meta-analysis of 46 case-control studies, compared with never or rarely having used a cellular phone, regular use was not associated with tumor risk in the random-effects meta-analysis. However, in the subgroup meta-analysis by research group, there was a statistically significant positive association (harmful effect) in the Hardell et al. studies (OR, 1.15—95% CI, 1.00 to 1.33— n = 10), a statistically significant negative association (beneficial effect) in the INTERPHONE-related studies (case-control studies from 13 countries coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); (OR, 0.81—95% CI, 0.75 to 0.89—n = 9), and no statistically significant association in other research groups’ studies. Further, cellular phone use with cumulative call time more than 1000 h statistically significantly increased the risk of tumors. This comprehensive meta-analysis of case-control studies found evidence that linked cellular phone use to increased tumor risk"
this man spitting
- Oct 28, 2021
Danny@be2 ur living on borrowed time cock..
wouldn't be surprised if OP's account suddenly becomes inactive - Oct 28, 2021·3 replieswhippet volverse
I'm pretty sure this is actually legit, high RF exposure has been correlated with increased number of tumors in different animal studies. but they're gonna hide the data until we as a society can't ignore increasing cancer rates. and on top of that, the amount of technology today's people are exposed to even on average is probably very dangerous. so I don't know what can really even be done
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8079/htm
"bstract
We investigated whether cellular phone use was associated with increased risk of tumors using a meta-analysis of case-control studies. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to July 2018. The primary outcome was the risk of tumors by cellular phone use, which was measured by pooling each odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). In a meta-analysis of 46 case-control studies, compared with never or rarely having used a cellular phone, regular use was not associated with tumor risk in the random-effects meta-analysis. However, in the subgroup meta-analysis by research group, there was a statistically significant positive association (harmful effect) in the Hardell et al. studies (OR, 1.15—95% CI, 1.00 to 1.33— n = 10), a statistically significant negative association (beneficial effect) in the INTERPHONE-related studies (case-control studies from 13 countries coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); (OR, 0.81—95% CI, 0.75 to 0.89—n = 9), and no statistically significant association in other research groups’ studies. Further, cellular phone use with cumulative call time more than 1000 h statistically significantly increased the risk of tumors. This comprehensive meta-analysis of case-control studies found evidence that linked cellular phone use to increased tumor risk"
If this is true we’re f***ed
Oct 28, 2021Earbuds in general aren’t health for auditory senses
Oct 28, 2021·2 repliesi hope this isn’t true… i fall asleep with one in every night
- Oct 28, 2021DVLPR
If this is true we’re f***ed
We BEEN f***ed..
- Oct 28, 2021·1 replyDVLPR
If this is true we’re f***ed
I mean there’s no way all that cellphone use is good
- Oct 28, 2021·1 replyshane
I mean there’s no way all that cellphone use is good
lol we say this typing on ktt2.com. someone born in the 2000s has probably already been exposed to a lifetime's worth of this RF s*** if it really does cause cancer.
Oct 28, 2021damn im f***ed
- Oct 28, 2021·1 replyhot pancakes
i hope this isn’t true… i fall asleep with one in every night
Before falling asleep with an airpod:
After falling asleep with an airpod for years on end:
Oct 28, 2021·4 repliescellphone next to my nuts and airpods next to my brain
WE RAIDIATING!!
rano 🇧🇷Oct 28, 2021if you buy that garbage you deserve it
Oct 28, 2021This why I stick to wired
Something about having a whole electrical device in my ears all day makes me uncomfortable
Don't get me wrong I sleep next to my phone and s*** and I prob shouldnt but wired headphones >
Oct 28, 2021whippet volverseI'm pretty sure this is actually legit, high RF exposure has been correlated with increased number of tumors in different animal studies. but they're gonna hide the data until we as a society can't ignore increasing cancer rates. and on top of that, the amount of technology today's people are exposed to even on average is probably very dangerous. so I don't know what can really even be done
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8079/htm
"bstract
We investigated whether cellular phone use was associated with increased risk of tumors using a meta-analysis of case-control studies. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to July 2018. The primary outcome was the risk of tumors by cellular phone use, which was measured by pooling each odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). In a meta-analysis of 46 case-control studies, compared with never or rarely having used a cellular phone, regular use was not associated with tumor risk in the random-effects meta-analysis. However, in the subgroup meta-analysis by research group, there was a statistically significant positive association (harmful effect) in the Hardell et al. studies (OR, 1.15—95% CI, 1.00 to 1.33— n = 10), a statistically significant negative association (beneficial effect) in the INTERPHONE-related studies (case-control studies from 13 countries coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); (OR, 0.81—95% CI, 0.75 to 0.89—n = 9), and no statistically significant association in other research groups’ studies. Further, cellular phone use with cumulative call time more than 1000 h statistically significantly increased the risk of tumors. This comprehensive meta-analysis of case-control studies found evidence that linked cellular phone use to increased tumor risk"
seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/brain.html
basically a flat line when mobile phones have been around for decades
