Oct 29, 2021After seeing that EMF video I will not use my AirPods again and not buying the new ones
Same EMF as a f***ing router lmao- Oct 29, 2021
Y0rnWe all gon be deaf
I could give af about being deaf, this s*** is microwaving your brain
Prob giving everyone brain cancer - Oct 29, 2021
Lowkey always felt somethin was off about airpods. Getting rid of mines honestly going back to wired headphones
- Oct 29, 2021
FreddieKaneTop5The brother of the guy who invented Kellogg’s Corn Flakes thought that fapping was killing people
it is lol
Oct 29, 2021
whippet volverseI'm pretty sure this is actually legit, high RF exposure has been correlated with increased number of tumors in different animal studies. but they're gonna hide the data until we as a society can't ignore increasing cancer rates. and on top of that, the amount of technology today's people are exposed to even on average is probably very dangerous. so I don't know what can really even be done
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8079/htm
"bstract
We investigated whether cellular phone use was associated with increased risk of tumors using a meta-analysis of case-control studies. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to July 2018. The primary outcome was the risk of tumors by cellular phone use, which was measured by pooling each odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). In a meta-analysis of 46 case-control studies, compared with never or rarely having used a cellular phone, regular use was not associated with tumor risk in the random-effects meta-analysis. However, in the subgroup meta-analysis by research group, there was a statistically significant positive association (harmful effect) in the Hardell et al. studies (OR, 1.15—95% CI, 1.00 to 1.33— n = 10), a statistically significant negative association (beneficial effect) in the INTERPHONE-related studies (case-control studies from 13 countries coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC); (OR, 0.81—95% CI, 0.75 to 0.89—n = 9), and no statistically significant association in other research groups’ studies. Further, cellular phone use with cumulative call time more than 1000 h statistically significantly increased the risk of tumors. This comprehensive meta-analysis of case-control studies found evidence that linked cellular phone use to increased tumor risk"
I can do it too
Finally, the meta-analysis which pooled different types of case-control studies and tumor types together is limited, as these tumors have different etiologies and no viable biological mechanism to how a cellular phone use exposure could cause these various tumors 8. The authors claim this as a strength, but it is in reality a limitation since it is unlikely cell phones cause cancer in the various cell types of all the body sites included in the meta-analysis. Cellular phone use emits non-ionizing (radiofrequency) radiation which, unlike ionizing radiation, lacks the ability to cause molecular damage in all types of tissue. Consequently, it is difficult to draw any meaningful conclusions from this approach. Based on the detailed methodological issues and uncertain interpretations, it is our opinion that this systematic review and meta-analysis does not present substantial evidence of a link between cellular phone use and tumor risk.
Oct 29, 2021·1 replyMFs worried about AirPods while looking like this
Not knowing the diabetes and the heart attack gon hit first.
Oct 29, 2021dopeMFs worried about AirPods while looking like this
Not knowing the diabetes and the heart attack gon hit first.
who looking like that really cmon most of us ktter are fit and sexy
Oct 29, 2021Your f***ed buddy
Oct 29, 2021science or Facts????
