like im thinking
even if say there was a news outlet that just reported the news with no agendas, didnt fearmonger etc

would people still make it a debate? or separate themselves into a group from opinion?

He says on remorse that the numbers on Google are way off he saying it's less or higher

it does, what you need to do is read many different sources (democrat and republican) and make a venn diagram

I haven't used it myself, but a youtuber I f*** with recommended this thing called Ground News which takes the same story from multiple sources so you can see it from multiple sides, no algorithm used in aggregating it all.

Again, I haven't so much as even googled it, just bringing it up cuz a decent philosophy based youtuber reccd it. I kind of dislike news on principle but maybe this thing does it aight.

pretty interesting, I'll check it out, seems like it makes what I do easier lol

It’s def higher

alex jones out now

A lot of scientific news is more neutral. People would still split into different groups though. Philosophy doesn't really die.

Neutral News almost never exists lol. History is news and that s*** is just from someone's written perspective.

News is also history, just very recent history

neutral news used to be a thing and still are in some countries

Not if it’s coming from a for profit source

No such thing

just wanna say a little more

not sure one single news outlet could ever be neutral

but when you take the dozens we have access to and see what's missing from the various sides, you can come to a neutral conclusion yourself

Reuters and the Associated Press are like the least biased news sources out

Neutral news for the most part is underground news like Abba and Preach

Another Sispyphus55 watcher?

to answer the question though, I used to visit this site a lot

allsides.com/unbiased-balanced-news

not sure why I stopped, but it lists the same news stories from left, right, and centre sources

I think the thing is all news is going to be biased because it is a secondary source, so the person reporting it will always have a bias of their own.

foxnews.com

ayyy you know it

It’s impossible

I mean there is no profit in neutral news. The fearmongering, the exaggerations, the fake news, all of that is profitable.

c-span and PBS is about as close as you're gonna get

c-span often hosts content with no commentators, just mindnumbingly boring footage of congress in their natural habitat. their lack of a narrative has become a meme kinda