Sep 16, 2021
Q3DWhat's this obsession with neutral news and people having to not take sides? Journalism is a political job pretty much you're bound to have some degree of subjectivity in there, what would neutral news even be
"this happened" "that happened" like what's even the point of reading thatI dont know itd be nice to just see whats happening without blaming it on Red or Blue
- Sep 16, 2021
Scratchin MambaAmericans that think the entire world can be summ up in dem & republicans are so cute
Once they turned Coronavirus into democrat vs republican I knew it was a wrap
Sep 16, 2021Anymore? As if it ever did? The Hearst empire was just a rich guy buying up newspapers his son could eventually run to support his political views.
Now there was the FCC Fairness Doctrine which applied to broadcast licenses and guaranteed time for opposing viewpoints. You can't make news apolitical. You can provide space in the mainstream for opposing interpretations of it. Instead, people have been funneled into their own insular spaces. The media conglomerates have also narrowed control over these platforms considerably.
- Sep 16, 2021Twist Your Cap
sorry I'll add commie news to my next one
Real
- Sep 16, 2021Twist Your Cap
because that isn't how it works... science changes based on information, there's no 1 right way
I'm not talking about previous theories being disproven tho
- Sep 16, 2021Bestowed
Yes but only for natural disasters
Tbh not even that lmao
Whether certain famines are caused by natural disasters or poor governance is veeery political
Sep 16, 2021objective news has never existed
closest you'll ever get is financial news
Sep 16, 2021nope not possible. given the rise of identity politics it's just too easy for media companies to make money by taking a certain side. neutrality is too boring for most people.