"If AI makes better music than humans why should we not be allowed to listen to it?"
The creatives on KTT will say, "Because its not real and there's no human emotion behind it."
Like I give AF, lol.
No disrespect to the creatives, but they are taking this s*** way too seriously.
“ Like I give AF, lol.
No disrespect to the creatives, but they are taking this s*** way too seriously.”
And you wonder why people are calling you a b****.
Speaking of real human art, need u to drop again
No cap. Its Bout that time for my lil 3 track ep a year
I hear you, man. I really do. And I'm not disagreeing with you.
But if it sounds good, I'm gonna listen
Get better taste.
People who enjoy AI in music, don't actually like music, and should not have their opinions on music taken seriously.
AI and streaming go hand in hand
There's millions of AI tracks already on Spotify, but I doubt any one of them would ever become popular enough to become a hit
And those Drake AI songs were s***
Only time AI should be used for music is when you do silly s*** like making SpongeBob sing a SZA song
People who enjoy AI in music, don't actually like music, and should not have their opinions on music taken seriously.
I wouldn’t say they don’t like music, they definitely hate artistry though.
can anyone explain the problem with someone photoshopping a d*** in my grandmas mouth??
Then again the way I see it AI music is music if you stripped everything that makes it worth anything.
As long as it looks good I really dont care.
But I get YOUR point!
I just don't look at art as "art", but more so a product.
And once again, not saying that's right.
Art in itself is not a product, it can be used as a product as has been done by the slimy industry but in it's inception an art piece is a form of expression
AI don't know how to express genuine and original emotions at this point. It might look or sound good on the surface, but you know there isn't anything deeper to it. The fact that many films, songs, paintings are rooted in real memories, experiences etc is what gives them this extra dimension
can anyone explain the problem with someone photoshopping a d*** in my grandmas mouth??
No one uses that to say the use of photoshop should be regulated though
this is what happens when society spends decades harping about how worthless pursuing art is: a bunch of pseudo-intellectuals not only proud of their own estrangement from human connection but excited for a future built around it
As long as we got your voice in the database you can die today but that voice belongs to the world so much that we can use it however we want to. Even if it’s something you never said, never wanted to be a part of or even more we gonna use your voice to say what we want you to say, for centuries.
That’s the future of AI if nobody has a problem with it.
No one uses that to say the use of photoshop should be regulated though
people do want and have regulated photoshop p*** (just like how deepfakes which are just a sequel to that) and you can get in trouble for photoshopping someone negatively or against their wish, this already exists on rules of platforms and in some laws
But my issue with AI music and AI adjacent is not a artistry one, its a personal autonomy and copyright
I think AI can exist itself, again just like photoshop, just that the copyright and violation of personal liberties' is the issue
Like a company can make AI music or pictures off of their own data etc.
But someone making AI music of anyone would be illegal and so would be using a data set not properly allowed or agreed upon
Randoms randomly using artists for ai, or like how some generative companies such as midjourney use random photos even kids suffering from cancer and their make a wish drawings
Its really just a situation of advanced copyright law and "photoshop rights"
Which are being fought for right now, such as the 2pac estate and make a wish of the kids drawings
AI in itself is fine tho, all imo
this is what happens when society spends decades harping about how worthless pursuing art is: a bunch of pseudo-intellectuals not only proud of their own estrangement from human connection but excited for a future built around it
Laymen’s terms: niggas that get no p**** lmao
Art in itself is not a product, it can be used as a product as has been done by the slimy industry but in it's inception an art piece is a form of expression
AI don't know how to express genuine and original emotions at this point. It might look or sound good on the surface, but you know there isn't anything deeper to it. The fact that many films, songs, paintings are rooted in real memories, experiences etc is what gives them this extra dimension
Take notes.
people do want and have regulated photoshop p*** (just like how deepfakes which are just a sequel to that) and you can get in trouble for photoshopping someone negatively or against their wish, this already exists on rules of platforms and in some laws
But my issue with AI music and AI adjacent is not a artistry one, its a personal autonomy and copyright
I think AI can exist itself, again just like photoshop, just that the copyright and violation of personal liberties' is the issue
Like a company can make AI music or pictures off of their own data etc.
But someone making AI music of anyone would be illegal and so would be using a data set not properly allowed or agreed upon
Randoms randomly using artists for ai, or like how some generative companies such as midjourney use random photos even kids suffering from cancer and their make a wish drawings
Its really just a situation of advanced copyright law and "photoshop rights"
Which are being fought for right now, such as the 2pac estate and make a wish of the kids drawings
AI in itself is fine tho, all imo
Seems reasonable but honestly could see it getting messy as far as what’s regulated and what’s not. And possibly labels owning someone’s AI likeness would be wild and probably will end up happening
As long as we got your voice in the database you can die today but that voice belongs to the world so much that we can use it however we want to. Even if it’s something you never said, never wanted to be a part of or even more we gonna use your voice to say what we want you to say, for centuries.
That’s the future of AI if nobody has a problem with it.
But this has been true about pictures for a minute now, you think Pac wanted anything to do with The Game?
I don’t see this energy when people photoshop memes of historical figures on the regular. Maybe if it’s really egregious but for the most part it seems uncontroversial to realistically portray someone doing something they didn’t actually do
Why is audio so much worse
“ Like I give AF, lol.
No disrespect to the creatives, but they are taking this s*** way too seriously.”
And you wonder why people are calling you a b****.
So this makes me a b**** ?
Lighten up, man.
It’s really not that serious
People who enjoy AI in music, don't actually like music, and should not have their opinions on music taken seriously.
This is totally false
So you’re saying that because I like AI music, my entire history/lifetime of liking real music is wiped away?
Swing and a miss, fam.
I wouldn’t say they don’t like music, they definitely hate artistry though.
I wouldn’t say, hate. Just indifferent.
Man this whole beef smellin like a big test for the music companies into seeing how are ppl reacting to it and to start planting the idea