Reply
  • Apr 19, 2021

    Post your answers KTT2. No cheating.

  • Apr 19, 2021

    yur mumz

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    3 replies

    9

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    7 replies

    1

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    3 replies
    Saturday

    1

    Dumbass alert 🚨🚨

  • Apr 19, 2021
    Saturday

    1

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    2 replies

    Are people really debating this?

  • Apr 19, 2021
    SHAQUILLE

    Are people really debating this?

    Ppl don't understand basic math

  • sabbaroni 🧔🏻
    Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    2 replies

    the PEMDAS debate exists bc it’s purposefully ambiguous. you’re never supposed to actually use the ÷ sign, you’re just supposed to use numerators and denominators

    both ways to answer (9 and 1) are correct, but the American way of learning PEMDAS would make 9 correct

  • Apr 19, 2021

    Every time this is debated, the answer changes

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    SHAQUILLE

    Are people really debating this?

    Yeah, it's trending on twitter atm, haha.

    I've actually seen an interesting argument that this equation can be solved differently by distributing the 2 into the parentheses, but I think that's an older mathematical concept that aged out (as far as I understood reading on twitter, that is).

  • Apr 19, 2021
    sabbaroni

    the PEMDAS debate exists bc it’s purposefully ambiguous. you’re never supposed to actually use the ÷ sign, you’re just supposed to use numerators and denominators

    both ways to answer (9 and 1) are correct, but the American way of learning PEMDAS would make 9 correct

    I KNEW IT

    did the Australian way

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Saturday

    1

    More 9 myself.

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    gh0stman

    Dumbass alert 🚨🚨

    F*** you, man.

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    1 reply

    The answer is 9 I suppose, but the real answer is that nobody should write it like that and nobody WOULD write it like that, because it could be misinterpreted.

    if I write 1/2x, Do I mean 0.5x or do I mean 1/(2x)? It'd deliberately ambiguous

  • Apr 19, 2021

    I can't solve this with PEMDAS

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    2 replies
    orangejuice

    Yeah, it's trending on twitter atm, haha.

    I've actually seen an interesting argument that this equation can be solved differently by distributing the 2 into the parentheses, but I think that's an older mathematical concept that aged out (as far as I understood reading on twitter, that is).

    Distributing the 2 still gives you 1 though

    6 / (2 + 4)
    6 / 6
    1

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    hemaglox

    Distributing the 2 still gives you 1 though

    6 / (2 + 4)
    6 / 6
    1

    Yeah, that's what I mean.

    As explained by another user in this thread, the way most Americans are taught order of operations would lead us to get 9 when solving this problem.

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    1 reply

    So this is just another instance of Americans thinking their way is the universal way

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    6 replies

    (1+2) = 3

    6/2 = 3

    3⋅3 = 9

    lock thread.

  • Apr 19, 2021

    I think 1

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    Monkai

    More 9 myself.

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    orangejuice

    Post your answers KTT2. No cheating.

    bedmas ? right so
    brackets
    exponets
    divison
    mutiple
    addition
    subtraction

  • notation for this is wonky

  • Apr 19, 2021
    ·
    1 reply
    GT500KR

    bedmas ? right so
    brackets
    exponets
    divison
    mutiple
    addition
    subtraction

    I've never heard it said this way. That's interesting. Where did you learn it?