Respectfully, that doesn’t really mean much coming from someone saying a whole lotta nothing on this topic.
i just re read what you said in that quote and it reassures me theres no need for us to ever interact on this topic ever again
Why are you defending an apartheid royalty billionaire online?
defending what?
lol youre insufferable
example narrative: "tesla is laying off 10% of their workforce!!"
truth: they are laying off 10% of people outside of their major work force. this does not apply to anyone actually building cars, battery packs or installing solar, aka the majority of the work force.
so really like maybe 3-4% total
but yall will find some weird and negative angle to take on it
First of all what does this have to do with you lying about wfh only stopping for exec staff
And yes, I can read, it was in the email that it didn't apply to people building cars
Great deflection
But show me the Tesla invoice
You should not be doing this for free man, know your worth
Yk how they say if u good at something don't do it for free? You deserve to get something in return for this level of d***riding
I want you and other Elon d***riders to see the fruits of your labor, you deserve better king
im not sure if labor shortages will be a persistent thing though, and im very sure that the labor shortages are not wholly or even largely attributable to people rejecting working conditions such as "workers will come to work when they work" -- wages/conditions in a much broader sense, that likely makes up a big portion of labor shortage, but that category in itself was/is influenced a lot by covid
im just sayin that there's a strange entitlement to WFH that's popped up since covid, and it's an unrealistic one for ppl to expect for the future. will it be offered more frequently than it was pre-covid? for sure, at some places. i just think generally the value for a business of having its people work in a more centralized way again will far outweigh the desire of people who want to frequently WFH
How is it strange? If companies have thrived months or years with their employees working from home why force them to come back to the office?
If I have my office setup at home and don't need to be in the office, what is the point of going back to the office?
i dont support him because he does or doesnt lay people off lmao
yall use every single move he does as some attack on humanity lol
You realize that has nothing to do with it right? Companies are forced to lay people off, it happens sometimes.
But you seriously think it’s a compete coincidence that email got sent out about employees having to return to the office and 2 days later they say they’re halting hiring and need to cut 10%????
You REALLY think that’s just a coincidence?
It’s f***ing scummy
The world where everything you want is yours if you work hard enough
As I get older I really understand exactly why so many people think the way they do now. All the people who want hand outs and socialism and all that.
People wanna put minimal effort into everything. S*** sad to me. World could be great if everyone put in their all
i respect the audacity to double down on bad posts
The tighter labor market is directly associated to the elevated number of job openings concentrated in the middle and upper middle of earners. The further tightening of the market post lockdowns was fueled by a a consumer reaction to long time stagnate growth of wages even during last economic expansion we saw post 2010.
It is directly associated to workers capitalizing on the large number of openings post Covid and understanding their leverage in renegotiating salaries as inflation/number of open positions compounded together.
We’ve seen repeated push back on WFH in the last year from financial services sector to tech. It’s failed repeatedly for the companies that have tried to fight it (Goldman, Citi, etc)
Workers with actual leverage can and will dictate what the norm is and companies operating in this tight labor market don’t have much an option to axe a benefit highly skilled talent values. If they won’t provide it a competitor will.
for the most part i think we're on the same page w ur first 2 paragraphs, but im jus sayin that the link between ur first 2 paragraphs and ur last 2 paragraphs is not direct. the wfh issue is associated with all the other reasons ppl aren't working, and those reasons are various and with stronger weights
theoretically what you're saying is possible, but i don't think that theory accounts for the fact that whatever leverage people have to demand wfh currently is largely supported by the pandemic. a lot of that leverage is going to fall away once the social background necessitating it becomes minor/nonexistent
ELON MUSK OMG !!!!!!!!!!!
How is it strange? If companies have thrived months or years with their employees working from home why force them to come back to the office?
If I have my office setup at home and don't need to be in the office, what is the point of going back to the office?
from a worker's pov i get this and i would want the same. im saying that it's strange bc in the future most businesses are going to want their people back in offices in large part compared to how liberally WFH has been offered during this pandemic, and asking the "what's the point of it?" question won't do anything
from a worker's pov i get this and i would want the same. im saying that it's strange bc in the future most businesses are going to want their people back in offices in large part compared to how liberally WFH has been offered during this pandemic, and asking the "what's the point of it?" question won't do anything
As a person in a leadership position that allows people to work from home or from office, our agents who are in office have about 4x more productivity across the company. The mindset is diff when you are in office, you have quicker access to get questions answered, and more support in general from coworkers/managers.
People don’t do s*** when working from home. Too many distractions.
Nobody was applying any effort in the office either. It was all bullshit posturing and pretending to be more busy than you actually are. WFH simply removes the bs from the equation.
Pretty much all the studies I’ve seen say WFH is more productive. No time wasted on commuting so you’re better rested, meetings are more to the point and there are less of them, etc
Quick Google effort will show you working from home is much less productive. In some cases, 70% less productive.
In my office and our entire company, people that work from office are about 4x more productive than those who work from home.
google.com/search?q=wfh+less+productive&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari
As a person in a leadership position that allows people to work from home or from office, our agents who are in office have about 4x more productivity across the company. The mindset is diff when you are in office, you have quicker access to get questions answered, and more support in general from coworkers/managers.
People don’t do s*** when working from home. Too many distractions.
this seems like the very obvious consequence of working at home im not sure where the “working at home is beneficial for the company” mindset came from tbh
this seems like the very obvious consequence of working at home im not sure where the “working at home is beneficial for the company” mindset came from tbh
When Covid hit I think everyone from the top down just started telling themselves anything to feel better about the situation. There’s also an element of spinning the narrative of everyone having to work from home during that time into a positive. It isn’t, though.
for the most part i think we're on the same page w ur first 2 paragraphs, but im jus sayin that the link between ur first 2 paragraphs and ur last 2 paragraphs is not direct. the wfh issue is associated with all the other reasons ppl aren't working, and those reasons are various and with stronger weights
theoretically what you're saying is possible, but i don't think that theory accounts for the fact that whatever leverage people have to demand wfh currently is largely supported by the pandemic. a lot of that leverage is going to fall away once the social background necessitating it becomes minor/nonexistent
Taking with what you said here in consideration I agree with only emphasizing WFH as norm/expectation of workers is definitely a significant factor and carries heavy weight for the specific earners demographic I pointed out
Quick Google effort will show you working from home is much less productive. In some cases, 70% less productive.
In my office and our entire company, people that work from office are about 4x more productive than those who work from home.
https://www.google.com/search?q=wfh+less+productive&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari
Googling “wfh more productive” gives you just as many articles and studies confirming it
Googling “wfh more productive” gives you just as many articles and studies confirming it
When I googled that exactly there were like two studies that said it was more productive and the rest say it isn’t.
Let’s say the studies are a moot point, though. Logic would tell you working from home is less productive, and personal experience confirms it. I’m sure, in some settings, it may be diff but in general people aren’t going to work as hard at home with all the variables involved. Human nature.
When I googled that exactly there were like two studies that said it was more productive and the rest say it isn’t.
Let’s say the studies are a moot point, though. Logic would tell you working from home is less productive, and personal experience confirms it. I’m sure, in some settings, it may be diff but in general people aren’t going to work as hard at home with all the variables involved. Human nature.
I mean in my personal experience everyone I work with is happier working from home and there hasn’t been a dip in productivity. Maybe during the first month or so when everything was new. And if the studies are moot then why even try to post one lol
When I googled that exactly there were like two studies that said it was more productive and the rest say it isn’t.
Let’s say the studies are a moot point, though. Logic would tell you working from home is less productive, and personal experience confirms it. I’m sure, in some settings, it may be diff but in general people aren’t going to work as hard at home with all the variables involved. Human nature.
People are only going to be as productive as they need to be period. No one wants to work towards the fallacy of being "more productive" because you're still getting paid as much as the guy meeting the bare minimum.
You can't really push people to be more productive when that productivity isn't incentivized.
People are only going to be as productive as they need to be period. No one wants to work towards the fallacy of being "more productive" because you're still getting paid as much as the guy meeting the bare minimum.
You can't really push people to be more productive when that productivity isn't incentivized.
In my company, you are paid in direct correlation to your productivity. So, if what you were saying were true then people should be just as productive from home as they are in office. Yet, in my company the people who are in office are 4x more productive, on average and making 4x the amount. Human nature.
Broke ass niggas d***riding a nigga that would fire them for taking off cause they mom died
This shouldn't be as funny as it is