All of these are about the smeller's subjective experience not the smell of the thing
So are stinky and musty…
So are stinky and musty…
yeah i was gonna say
op complaining about the fundamental plasticity of interpreting language
yeah i was gonna say
op complaining about the fundamental plasticity of interpreting language
Don't call me OP I have a name
So are stinky and musty…
Those words are dedicated to smell
Everything else is a synonym (aromatic, foul), a very loose metaphor (decadent, unctuous), a loan from another sense (sweet, spicy), or a name of a source (rose, lemon)
On the flip side @plants Jahai people of Malaysia have a word to describe the scent of gasoline, bat droppings, shrimp paste, millipedes, rotten meat, etc. etc. They have words for smells like we have for colours
Majority of "tribal" (few Asian) languages are like this
Afrikaans is such a goofy language. The words given to refer to things are so literal, no creativity. Gums literally translate to "tooth meat". A squirrel is a "mouse dog" and a skunk is a "stink mouse dog"
This is hilarious
Afrikaans is such a goofy language. The words given to refer to things are so literal, no creativity. Gums literally translate to "tooth meat". A squirrel is a "mouse dog" and a skunk is a "stink mouse dog"
Y'all say muishond fr?
The problem with English is it's the most common language for Monolinguals, so they cannot even fathom how complex other languages are
English is so basic but needlessly complicated it's crazy bro
All of these are about the smeller's subjective experience not the smell of the thing
implying there's a difference between the two
implying there's a difference between the two
This is like saying "pass me that thing that looks like a lemon" and you mean a banana because it's yellow
implying there's a difference between the two
I'm glad you edited this comment to show some humility and doubt at this outrageous sentiment
This is like saying "pass me that thing that looks like a lemon" and you mean a banana because it's yellow
not at all
smell is entirely a phenomenological entity. A thing's smell is what the smeller experiences. There is no "independent smell"
not at all
smell is entirely a phenomenological entity. A thing's smell is what the smeller experiences. There is no "independent smell"
This comment applies to all senses lmao yet English does a great job breaking down sight, touch and taste to incredulous degrees
We just missed smell - other languages have it like I said
not at all
smell is entirely a phenomenological entity. A thing's smell is what the smeller experiences. There is no "independent smell"
Also no this is wrong: Isoamyl acetate is the smell of a banana and pear
This comment applies to all senses lmao yet English does a great job breaking down sight, touch and taste to incredulous degrees
We just missed smell - other languages have it like I said
yes it does apply to all senses
ur point abt english being weird abt smell is entirely valid btw. especially strange considering how closely tied smell is to memory
Also no this is wrong: Isoamyl acetate is the smell of a banana and pear
no, it's just a chemical.
until it's sniffed, it isn't a smell
no, it's just a chemical.
until it's sniffed, it isn't a smell
I mean you're not wrong but I don't see what this has to do with English having nominal smell words but other languages having rich lexicons for all senses
yes it does apply to all senses
ur point abt english being weird abt smell is entirely valid btw. especially strange considering how closely tied smell is to memory
Because the language sucks cock
de ahora en adelante vamos a hablar español
de ahora en adelante vamos a hablar español
Enough of that. I'll get to Spanish on a later thread
Enough of that. I'll get to Spanish on a later thread
aren't u British 😂
I mean you're not wrong but I don't see what this has to do with English having nominal smell words but other languages having rich lexicons for all senses
oh its basically irrelevant
the phenomenology stuff is completely a tangent lol