Oct 20·1 replyIt’s funny he says this isn’t going to be a hangout movie and then compared it to Jackie brown, when he’s also said that he thinks the first half of Jackie brown is a hangout movie until the scheme happens.
Oct 21·2 repliesOscar WinnerIt’s funny he says this isn’t going to be a hangout movie and then compared it to Jackie brown, when he’s also said that he thinks the first half of Jackie brown is a hangout movie until the scheme happens.
Saw a report that fincher chopped over 60 pages of Tarantino script, f*** this guy I’m losing faith
Oct 21·2 repliesBurgerBoi777Saw a report that fincher chopped over 60 pages of Tarantino script, f*** this guy I’m losing faith
To be fair QT gave him 230 pages. That's entirely unworkable unless the film was going to be 3.5-4 hours. He gave a script larger than both Kill Bills combined. A dense 170 is what QT himself would normally go for on his longer films.
Don't think any reasonable expectation was to direct 230 pages. He just had an abundance to go off of. Fincher's known to chop down excess.
- Oct 21·1 replyBurgerBoi777
Saw a report that fincher chopped over 60 pages of Tarantino script, f*** this guy I’m losing faith
Wait why? The script was mad long bro. QT gave him 200 plus pages and it’s still 140min long
- Oct 21YANDHI
To be fair QT gave him 230 pages. That's entirely unworkable unless the film was going to be 3.5-4 hours. He gave a script larger than both Kill Bills combined. A dense 170 is what QT himself would normally go for on his longer films.
Don't think any reasonable expectation was to direct 230 pages. He just had an abundance to go off of. Fincher's known to chop down excess.
Facts. Tarantino also said “I gave Fincher a plethora of material to work with. I didn’t just hand over a script, he has everything so he can pick and choose what to use and have his options”
- Oct 21YANDHI
To be fair QT gave him 230 pages. That's entirely unworkable unless the film was going to be 3.5-4 hours. He gave a script larger than both Kill Bills combined. A dense 170 is what QT himself would normally go for on his longer films.
Don't think any reasonable expectation was to direct 230 pages. He just had an abundance to go off of. Fincher's known to chop down excess.
Interesting thanks for the info
Still tho that’s a lot of content we losing unless a novel version comes out
Shoulda shot it all and edited it down, that way we could get a mini series version down the line like with the hateful 8
- Oct 21·2 repliesOscar Winner
Wait why? The script was mad long bro. QT gave him 200 plus pages and it’s still 140min long
It’s not just that I been seeing a lot of sketchy stuff, like Netflix giving him way less money than he asked for to make the movie, which is insane when you see the money spent on some of these slop Netflix originals like rebel moon or the JLo in a robot movie
They saying that’s why he split from Netflix too, which makes me wonder if he’s unhappy with the final product and is blaming Netflix for cheaping out
Hope I’m wrong obv
Oct 21- Oct 21
Is this the first film that is IMAX only?
OPOct 212012Add release date to thread title? @op
u got it boss
- Oct 21·1 replyBurgerBoi777
It’s not just that I been seeing a lot of sketchy stuff, like Netflix giving him way less money than he asked for to make the movie, which is insane when you see the money spent on some of these slop Netflix originals like rebel moon or the JLo in a robot movie
They saying that’s why he split from Netflix too, which makes me wonder if he’s unhappy with the final product and is blaming Netflix for cheaping out
Hope I’m wrong obv
Yeah I mean Netflix should throw unlimited money at Tarantino/Fincher rather than slop.
Lol but then why you said “fuck this guy”?
- Oct 23
Finally seen the trailer for this in the theaters
- OPOct 23·1 replyBurgerBoi777
It’s not just that I been seeing a lot of sketchy stuff, like Netflix giving him way less money than he asked for to make the movie, which is insane when you see the money spent on some of these slop Netflix originals like rebel moon or the JLo in a robot movie
They saying that’s why he split from Netflix too, which makes me wonder if he’s unhappy with the final product and is blaming Netflix for cheaping out
Hope I’m wrong obv
Yeah. That’s what this all sensibly adds up to. It’s gonna suck or he’s gonna be unhappy with it. And after hearing about the 60 pages he cut — this all sounds like it could be a half-assed forced Netflix production as they become more desperate be known as a gouge that can also deliver prestige content. Recent layoffs are interesting timing too. Bad studios produce bad movies.
- Oct 23·edited·2 repliesilgnd
Yeah. That’s what this all sensibly adds up to. It’s gonna suck or he’s gonna be unhappy with it. And after hearing about the 60 pages he cut — this all sounds like it could be a half-assed forced Netflix production as they become more desperate be known as a gouge that can also deliver prestige content. Recent layoffs are interesting timing too. Bad studios produce bad movies.
Im holding onto faith. IMO Tarantino has never written anything bad. Cliffs character is dope. I love Fincher, so to me it seems impossible for this movie to suck lol
Oct 23Oscar WinnerIm holding onto faith. IMO Tarantino has never written anything bad. Cliffs character is dope. I love Fincher, so to me it seems impossible for this movie to suck lol
This, given the people involved it aint no way this movie is going to be bad. Im hyped for this
- OPOct 23·1 replyOscar Winner
Im holding onto faith. IMO Tarantino has never written anything bad. Cliffs character is dope. I love Fincher, so to me it seems impossible for this movie to suck lol
I want it to be good too but
- Oct 23·1 replyilgnd
I want it to be good too but
Lmao at least they made the finals still. Pistons was just too hungry
- OPOct 23Oscar Winner
Lmao at least they made the finals still. Pistons was just too hungry
Hoping the same for this movie lmao
Oct 23·1 replyIf this movie is anything less than great (and worst case scenario actively mid), would that be the biggest collab fumble in modern film?
- OPOct 23·edited·2 repliesCrimsonArk
If this movie is anything less than great (and worst case scenario actively mid), would that be the biggest collab fumble in modern film?
i think the original Fincher/Bale/Sorkin STEVE JOBS movie was the one for me, personally
as much as I still love that movie, I can only imagine...
- Oct 23·1 replyilgnd
i think the original Fincher/Bale/Sorkin STEVE JOBS movie was the one for me, personally
as much as I still love that movie, I can only imagine...
Didn’t even know that was suppose to be a thing
Would’ve been the same script/structure I’m assuming
- Oct 23Oscar Winner
Yeah I mean Netflix should throw unlimited money at Tarantino/Fincher rather than slop.
Lol but then why you said “fuck this guy”?
It gets the ppl going
- Oct 23·1 replyilgnd
i think the original Fincher/Bale/Sorkin STEVE JOBS movie was the one for me, personally
as much as I still love that movie, I can only imagine...
So sick of them trying to make Steve Jobs movies a thing atp lol tho this obviously woulda been the best one
- OPOct 23Oscar Winner
Didn’t even know that was suppose to be a thing
Would’ve been the same script/structure I’m assuming
woulda been the true successor to TSN