have you heard of the marvin gaye estate?
That has absolutely nothing to do with this
No I'm convinced if an artist offers a f***ing product they should deliver it and if an artist can't deliver then they should stop charging.
For vinyls
For tickets
For songs
It's not corporations that convince people that we should be given something if we got something
Frank has always given me anything I’ve ever paid for from him, what haven’t you got that you paid for?
I paid 0$ to stream coachella all weekend so yes
yo data plan screaming
Frank has always given me anything I’ve ever paid for from him, what haven’t you got that you paid for?
Niggas name is literally Free and wants us to complain about something we got for free
Man shut up
read your last post again
I was talking specifically about artists getting sued for dropping out of festivals and/or delivering a bad performance at a festival
Man shut up
you quoted me saying a post was dumb. I had no qualms with you
Buying a festival ticket is a ticket to the festival
their contract with Frank or any artist on their lineup is a whole separate thing that I have no involvement in
I was talking specifically about artists getting sued for dropping out of festivals and/or delivering a bad performance at a festival
ah ok I didn’t know your argument about setting a dangerous legal precedent only applied when it’s convenient to your argument and not mine
No I'm convinced if an artist offers a f***ing product they should deliver it and if an artist can't deliver then they should stop charging.
For vinyls
For tickets
For songs
It's not corporations that convince people that we should be given something if we got something
If we wanna get technical, attendees didn’t pay to see Frank Ocean, they paid to attend Coachella for 3 straight days and see hundreds of different artists, which is exactly what they got.
Which is why singular artists never get sued for dropping out of festivals, because that’s technically not what attendees are paying for
ah ok I didn’t know your argument about setting a dangerous legal precedent only applied when it’s convenient to your argument and not mine
This entire discussion is specifically about festivals and artists potentially being sued for dropping out, what are you talking about
If we wanna get technical, attendees didn’t pay to see Frank Ocean, they paid to attend Coachella for 3 straight days and see hundreds of different artists, which is exactly what they got.
Which is why singular artists never get sued for dropping out of festivals, because that’s technically not what attendees are paying for
DING DING DING
If we wanna get technical, attendees didn’t pay to see Frank Ocean, they paid to attend Coachella for 3 straight days and see hundreds of different artists, which is exactly what they got.
Which is why singular artists never get sued for dropping out of festivals, because that’s technically not what attendees are paying for
this is being obtuse and you know it.
this isn’t reasonable. frank did nothing wrong and will face no legal consequences whatsoever.
this is being obtuse and you know it.
It’s not at all.
They paid to attend Coachella and see hundreds of artists, including 2 other headlining acts and various other high profile mainstream musicians. They’re going to receive all of that
this isn’t reasonable. frank did nothing wrong and will face no legal consequences whatsoever.
Exactly, just like every artist that has dropped from a festival ever, congrats on making it this far
this is being obtuse and you know it.
dude has seen several firsthand accounts of people who bought passes and made travel arrangements just for frank and still posted this bs