is this a serious post?

the damage that easy access to p*** (and sexual content in media/advertising) has done to the perception of women and reward pathways in the brain is well documented

Real.

But there is a narrative from some on the left that s***work is a legit career choice. it's not. It is a very dangerous career.

I never denied it, I just said his post sounded speculative. If you have some sources I’d gladly read them, I just haven’t personally seen information about it is all lol

I’m not sure I’m fully understanding what you’re saying, but I would say some people support s***work as a form of liberation, even for middle-class women. Men’s promiscuity has often been praised or envied while women have been degraded for it, so it’s an attempt to reclaim women’s agency to decide how promiscuous they want to be.

If you are a labourer, your body, as labor power, is a commodity exchanged for wages from an employer. I don’t see why p*** or s***work is meaningfully different in this regard.

I sort of agree, I think the type of people who promote s***work can sometimes ignore how degrading it can be for some people. A lot of people might enjoy s***work but the idea that it is to be seen as another way to earn income is very odd to me. I guess it depends on whether you think s***as an act means something if there is no romantic connection between the people.

Deplorable behaviour,

I say, as a seasoned cocaine dealer

this is a deep topic to you?

Not really, im just lazy, couldnt find the right word so I settled on ‘deep’

Let ppl do what they want to if it don't harm anyone.

That's really all there is to it.

Most s***workers don't work for the fun of it. Thats the problem of it. Only fans is a small amount of people versus the amount of women who are pimped and trafficked through the industry.

If you solve the social and economic problems with their environment then you'll reduce the amount of s***workers.

@Mike22

Bingo this is it

can attest that I want to kms more after p*** consumption

really is

As a John who has procured the services of dozens of w****s in my time the benefits of s***work are clear as day.

I saw you chat a lot about not needing any sort of skills on the female end. That it’s more of a pick up and go profession. You absolutely need skills as a s***worker. You get what you pay for when it comes to that.

Some women advertise GFE and go above and beyond to make that a reality. Some women specialize in obscure fetishes and kinks and must be skilled enough to satisfy their customers.

Not to mention the amount of time and effort that goes into the maintenance of a top rate w**** body.

As for why any women would decide to be a s***worker when it isn’t necessary for them to survive...do you know another profession where you get paid $800-1500 for an hour of work? Many top escorts are independent and manage themselves. This means they personally select their own clients, build rapport, solidify their brand, etc and they do this on their own accord. Work when they want and how they want. Pretty obvious why this would be appealing to almost anymore.

In my opinion you should go ahead and cop a first class escort so you can tackle this from a different perspective. Talk to some of them after you f*** them. You will learn a lot about them and why they do what they do. Some answers might surprise you.

OP is a mess its literally in the name - s***WORK. Trying to make some pseudo-scientific argument based on the evolutionary aspects of s***is just meaningless. It’s a job, and should just be seen as such. You may think it has no real value as a job, but nor do many industries in the modern world and the same questions aren’t asked of them.

It doesn’t harm anyone, which is the only reason i would ever want something banned personally, and having a good legal, regulated industry makes it much safer for the overwhelmingly female s***workers who are probably one of the most endangered sections of the population.

Also, i know you opened your post saying you don’t wanna judge anyone, but honestly making the point that s***work is unquestionably ok for poor women but should be a***ysed and not supported for middle class women is some f***in Handmaids Tale tier take bro wtf

Most of this thread has never read the work of s***workers.

And why are you all equating s***work to literally selling p****. Where do strippers and cam girls fall in this discussion? Or women selling dirty pics on onlyfans? What about women who test s***toys for a living? That's s***work.

I was gonna make this thread last night!!!!!

There is none

This is problem the left has, always tryna moralize the individual

I support legalization of s***work because the govt can not or should not be infringing on people’s right to do whatever they want as long is harms no one

But does that mean i respect or think s***workers are empowering, role models or put together people? F*** no lmaoo

Why does everything have to be empowering to be respected

I had an argument with an ex for basically saying I don’t respect strippers

She was like how can i be a progressive and say that but like just because i think it should be legal or whatever doesnt mean i should hold them in high esteem

Who said it has to be

I don’t respect them OR think theyre empowering

That doesnt mean i think the govt should be in the business of regulating peoples bodies

This thread is purely made in response to the phenomenon of middle/upper-middle class ppl getting caught up in virtual or real s***work.

Whys's s***work okay for the poor but not people with coin?

This thread would be more interesting if OP was talking about the phenomenon of musicians using s***worker aesthetics while condemning s***work (Rico Nasty)

My thoughts are that there is no social merit, but its just an easy thing for someone to get into in terms of effort vs maximum financial gain

And my thoughts are that feminist movements have basically started to make it more acceptable based on this fact alone, and not on any social merits. And I would suspect its because feminist movements are made up of socially progressive people which include the s***workers themselves

Any arguments for empowerment or anything, I dont think theyre actually honest.