Reply
  • Dec 7, 2020
    Synopsis

    they shouldn't be taught things just to be tested them on the way its currently done, grading in it of itself is neutral, its the consequences of it that are wrong atm.

  • Dec 7, 2020
    Faygo

    Look at the post of above you. But I see something where the authority role of the teacher is removed and students and teachers all work together to learn the subject at hand. Not necessarily doing mindless schoolwork but actually engaging each other and working with each other to try to understand the subjects at hand.

    the problem here is that being a teacher implies a certain degree of mastery over the subject you're teaching, at least to a degree higher than students. So the problem is not the authority of the teacher, but how it manifest itself under capitalism

  • Dec 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Faygo

    Simply don’t click on my threads then nigga

    I just read titles. Dont see its your b****ass until I'm already in

  • Dec 7, 2020

    It should just be emphasized that failing in school isn’t failing in life. If you don’t do well in school you’re just not suited for what they’re training you for. There’s lots of careers outside stem medicine law and education

  • Dec 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Personally I feel the best way to teach someone anything is to get them so good at it that they will be able to teach it to others and demonstrate. But that leads more into me just not liking how things are taught to kids and how they are tested on it, but that's a different type of discussion.

  • I can't fault people for wanting the hi-score though

  • Dec 7, 2020

    Just got to be aware of your goals, and self worth. Realize that they aren't a part of your individual or your propensity to be successful within this world.

    I know dropouts who are millionaires, I know A students that haven't done s*** with their lives.

  • Dec 7, 2020
    ·
    2 replies

    OP showed up to class with nothing but a folder

  • Dec 7, 2020

    Should be pass or no pass

  • Dec 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Thebigbelts

    I just read titles. Dont see its your b****ass until I'm already in

    But you still posted on my thread on some p**** ass fan s***. You a hoe ass nigga in real life I already know

  • Dec 7, 2020
    ILLYE44

    OP showed up to class with nothing but a folder

  • Dec 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    how else are you going to measure someone's knowledge on subjects?

  • Dec 7, 2020

    There are schools across the country that don't utilize a traditional grading system or have moved toward getting rid of grades. But there's too much of a lack of resources to implement such personalized education. Only rich schools or schools with low class room size can succeed with this.

  • Dec 7, 2020
    Smacked Voodoo

    Personally I feel the best way to teach someone anything is to get them so good at it that they will be able to teach it to others and demonstrate. But that leads more into me just not liking how things are taught to kids and how they are tested on it, but that's a different type of discussion.

  • Dec 7, 2020
    bobby j

    how else are you going to measure someone's knowledge on subjects?

    go to the first page I addressed this. Valid question tho glad you asked

  • Dec 7, 2020

    Agreed

  • Dec 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    ILLYE44

    OP showed up to class with nothing but a folder

    they had to take op into a separate room when they did tests

  • Dec 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    some students are naturally more "gifted" at things than others though, at least in certain narrow contexts.

    I don't think the solution is necessarily to hide or eliminate this. instead, you should create a system where ALL students can discover their individual gifts/passions, and reach their full potential within those areas.

    at the same time, I agree that it shouldn't be framed as "you don't have a natural aptitude for x thing so you can never do it". students should understand that their minds are malleable, and be encouraged to experiment and explore different avenues

  • Dec 7, 2020

    Ya be doing a lil too much with ya threads now

  • Dec 7, 2020
    Replica

    they had to take op into a separate room when they did tests

  • Dec 7, 2020
    coltrup

    some students are naturally more "gifted" at things than others though, at least in certain narrow contexts.

    I don't think the solution is necessarily to hide or eliminate this. instead, you should create a system where ALL students can discover their individual gifts/passions, and reach their full potential within those areas.

    at the same time, I agree that it shouldn't be framed as "you don't have a natural aptitude for x thing so you can never do it". students should understand that their minds are malleable, and be encouraged to experiment and explore different avenues

    this is the main issue

    kids are shoehorned from an early age into believing they don't have an aptitude for math or whatever

  • Dec 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Synopsis

    i don't know why you'd automatically assume this is true

    What else would incentivize them to push themselves

  • Dec 7, 2020

    There are countries out there who don’t resign to grading and testing and they all seem to be doing fine on an educational front allowing their students to learn and grow in more natural ways. Education isn’t a prerequisite for learning and failure is an inherent part of life. You don’t need a grade to excel at either.

  • Dec 7, 2020
    PNW

    What else would incentivize them to push themselves

    I would imagine the negative effects of grading outweight the positives, and it certainly isn't going to incentivize anyone who wasn't already doing well.

    Humans are naturally curious creatures, we quite often do not need to be incentivized to learn. Capitalist school systems do a great job crushing that curiosity.