they shouldn't be taught things just to be tested them on the way its currently done, grading in it of itself is neutral, its the consequences of it that are wrong atm.
Look at the post of above you. But I see something where the authority role of the teacher is removed and students and teachers all work together to learn the subject at hand. Not necessarily doing mindless schoolwork but actually engaging each other and working with each other to try to understand the subjects at hand.
the problem here is that being a teacher implies a certain degree of mastery over the subject you're teaching, at least to a degree higher than students. So the problem is not the authority of the teacher, but how it manifest itself under capitalism
Simply don’t click on my threads then nigga
I just read titles. Dont see its your b****ass until I'm already in
It should just be emphasized that failing in school isn’t failing in life. If you don’t do well in school you’re just not suited for what they’re training you for. There’s lots of careers outside stem medicine law and education
Personally I feel the best way to teach someone anything is to get them so good at it that they will be able to teach it to others and demonstrate. But that leads more into me just not liking how things are taught to kids and how they are tested on it, but that's a different type of discussion.
Just got to be aware of your goals, and self worth. Realize that they aren't a part of your individual or your propensity to be successful within this world.
I know dropouts who are millionaires, I know A students that haven't done s*** with their lives.
I just read titles. Dont see its your b****ass until I'm already in
But you still posted on my thread on some p**** ass fan s***. You a hoe ass nigga in real life I already know
There are schools across the country that don't utilize a traditional grading system or have moved toward getting rid of grades. But there's too much of a lack of resources to implement such personalized education. Only rich schools or schools with low class room size can succeed with this.
Personally I feel the best way to teach someone anything is to get them so good at it that they will be able to teach it to others and demonstrate. But that leads more into me just not liking how things are taught to kids and how they are tested on it, but that's a different type of discussion.
how else are you going to measure someone's knowledge on subjects?
go to the first page I addressed this. Valid question tho glad you asked
OP showed up to class with nothing but a folder
they had to take op into a separate room when they did tests
some students are naturally more "gifted" at things than others though, at least in certain narrow contexts.
I don't think the solution is necessarily to hide or eliminate this. instead, you should create a system where ALL students can discover their individual gifts/passions, and reach their full potential within those areas.
at the same time, I agree that it shouldn't be framed as "you don't have a natural aptitude for x thing so you can never do it". students should understand that their minds are malleable, and be encouraged to experiment and explore different avenues
some students are naturally more "gifted" at things than others though, at least in certain narrow contexts.
I don't think the solution is necessarily to hide or eliminate this. instead, you should create a system where ALL students can discover their individual gifts/passions, and reach their full potential within those areas.
at the same time, I agree that it shouldn't be framed as "you don't have a natural aptitude for x thing so you can never do it". students should understand that their minds are malleable, and be encouraged to experiment and explore different avenues
this is the main issue
kids are shoehorned from an early age into believing they don't have an aptitude for math or whatever
i don't know why you'd automatically assume this is true
What else would incentivize them to push themselves
There are countries out there who don’t resign to grading and testing and they all seem to be doing fine on an educational front allowing their students to learn and grow in more natural ways. Education isn’t a prerequisite for learning and failure is an inherent part of life. You don’t need a grade to excel at either.
What else would incentivize them to push themselves
I would imagine the negative effects of grading outweight the positives, and it certainly isn't going to incentivize anyone who wasn't already doing well.
Humans are naturally curious creatures, we quite often do not need to be incentivized to learn. Capitalist school systems do a great job crushing that curiosity.