It’s funny because you can spot a neo liberal from a mile away. Either they cape for capitalism because they hope to one day benefit from it or they’ve always benefitted from it and don’t want it to change because that means they have to admit they have always had an unfair advantage
anarcho-capitalist society when
man can't even understand a simple concept like risk and comparative revenue and how no one would give out loans without interest
On interest or socialism?
Re interest, it’s the best practise for both consumer and the lender. The consumer has the power not to undertake a contract if he/she deems the rates to be too high and the lender chooses whether the loan is risky or not.
Thank you that’s all I needed
Because there is no incentive to loan money and take the risk of the other party defaulting without interest
also if there was no interest, ppl would just stop loaning money and would just invest in something that's gonna make them even 0.0001% in profit lol
It’s funny because you can spot a neo liberal from a mile away. Either they cape for capitalism because they hope to one day benefit from it or they’ve always benefitted from it and don’t want it to change because that means they have to admit they have always had an unfair advantage
You really talking to a poster who cites Thomas sowell as an authority on finance...
simple financial literacy youngins
Wouldnt there still be debt in communism
Depends on what level of communism is in theory.
In true communism there is no debt as there is no equity as the government owns everything.
You really talking to a poster who cites Thomas sowell as an authority on finance...
sowell and friedman are f***ing jokes
sowell the same dude who was against civil rights during the MLK era and referred to protestors as thugs (sound familiar?
)
Thank you that’s all I needed
What are your thoughts on interest and or communism/socialism?
This fax what it got to do with interest tho
It’s just the concept promote predatory behavior and is extremely one sided to people who have always had the means to invest. Someone who has everything to lose and nothing to gain is always gonna be at the disadvantage.
If Daddy CEO gives me $10000 to invest in some stocks for play money, I lose nothing because at the end of the day, it’s only $10000 which isn’t s***, that’s like a fifth of the car I got for graduation.
If Brokeboi Benny whose parents never had s*** has to work a 9-5 and takes out a loan for $10k and it f***s up, that s*** gonna chase him for the rest of his life. Why is that fair?
Both niggas tryna run a 100 m dash but one dude starts 50 meters ahead and the other has to wait 3 seconds after the gun.
Why do you think the socio-demographics are so poor in those areas? Why do people still buy properties if there is no reason to renovate?
Furthermore, why do you think making others pay for overpriced housing is a fair and just way to earn capital? Lastly, you’re assuming that the people who own property actually do the renovation themselves. They again, through capital accumulation, hire others to do their work and sit back and collect a check because people NEED a place to live and don’t have any other option.
A renter doesn’t give a f*** whether you had to put yourself through college and have an insane amount of debt or if your parents literally put you through college and you don’t have a single cent of debt. They see you as a check that they need at the end of the month. How do you look at that system and justify it as not problematic. If you are attributing the problem elsewhere, then you’re admitting that somewhere, there is an issue.
jesus f***ing christ you’re just arguing to argue,
NO ONE SAID IT ISNT PROBLEMATIC
look at a f***ing supply and demand model, someone needs something, someone will hike the price up just tolerable enough to “afford” it, it literally explains everything under capitalism
why make it so complicated for yourself
It’s just the concept promote predatory behavior and is extremely one sided to people who have always had the means to invest. Someone who has everything to lose and nothing to gain is always gonna be at the disadvantage.
If Daddy CEO gives me $10000 to invest in some stocks for play money, I lose nothing because at the end of the day, it’s only $10000 which isn’t s***, that’s like a fifth of the car I got for graduation.
If Brokeboi Benny whose parents never had s*** has to work a 9-5 and takes out a loan for $10k and it f***s up, that s*** gonna chase him for the rest of his life. Why is that fair?
Both niggas tryna run a 100 m dash but one dude starts 50 meters ahead and the other has to wait 3 seconds after the gun.
I’m sorry but what is this argument lol
why would you only give money so that you yourself could make some sort of profit ?
why wouldnt you, lol, you motherfuckers think people are supposed to give a f*** about your feelings
This is such an ass backwards take. Oh god here come the stupid socialists. I don’t got time today. “The less productive you are the more you gain”.
can you explain why wages have not grown alongside gains in productivity the last 4 decades or so
I’m sorry but what is this argument lol
That socioeconomic factors play a role into why interest is a problematic system and that you looking at it in a vacuum is f***ing stupid
you gave a null hypothesis. i returned a statement to prove the null hypothesis wrong.
what the f*** is this, english class? you said some dumb s*** lmfao
Exactly it's an option for people who want the capital to start something. You can live your entire life not choosing to take out a loan. If there was no financial incentive why the f*** would people just hand out large amounts of money they could potentially lose?
you can live your entire life without taking out a loan and your options will be highly limited.
yet at the same time ceo payrates have soared
Sorry I can’t hear you bro I’m too incentivized to produce
You really talking to a poster who cites Thomas sowell as an authority on finance...
The fact that you mentioned Sowell and finance shows how little you know lmfao
what is the logic behind the "the jews" posts ITT
and what is the logic behind it being anti semitism
im lost on both sides
im somewhat aware that "people" say that jews are all powerful in hollywood/banking but i never really got into it
genuinely asking
the truth hurts
can you explain why wages have not grown alongside gains in productivity the last 4 decades or so
all the wealth goes from the bottom to the top and unions have been destroyed due to union-busting from the U.S government and also little circlejerks such as ALEC where corporations and lawmakers can work on bills together and push stuff out that stomps on the worker
That socioeconomic factors play a role into why interest is a problematic system and that you looking at it in a vacuum is f***ing stupid
The main benefit of a somewhat free market is a choice
If broke benny from your example, is in that dire straights and he/she still makes a risky investment, the blame is on him not on any bank and predatory behaviour.
The main benefit of a somewhat free market is a choice
If broke benny from your example, is in that dire straights and he/she still makes a risky investment, the blame is on him not on any bank and predatory behaviour.
Okay so then what are Benny’s options to escape his conditions?