The term black lives matter is more than just a name for a group anymore. Most people saying it dont even know about the groups members or history, or goals.
now the rothchild gonna preach to us about social justice huh yeah mr "my family is worth a few billion", go off defending the cause
Omg
now the rothchild gonna preach to us about social justice huh yeah mr "my family is worth a few billion", go off defending the cause
how wild is this
I find it funny when every media outlet unites at once to promote the same trend.
what's the quickest way to get black youths a criminal record and set back their community a couple of decades?
Wow so happy this thread was made.
Was truly starting to think I WAS a coon. Smfh.
I knew I wasn’t tripping.
To me BLM seems like straight a PSYOP but maybe it’s because, like yall are saying, it has been compromised. Can yall give me some background on this? I know some of the original movement leaders were whacked but can I get a little more detail on how the movement was compromised and by who?
The term black lives matter is more than just a name for a group anymore. Most people saying it dont even know about the groups members or history, or goals.
Facts I’d say it’s more of an ideology now than an actual movement.
Yo tbh BLM was f***ed the moment it turned partisan. Calling a brother a coon for not wanting to participate instead of trying to extend your arms with love for another Black person was the fall of this movement. It’s supposed to be against racism not against opposing ideas.
Wow so happy this thread was made.
Was truly starting to think I WAS a coon. Smfh.
I knew I wasn’t tripping.
Well if you believe any of the George Soros bullshit you're not just that you're also an antisemite
chaos is what they are salivating for in order to cause more division
Chaos is a ladder!
Well if you believe any of the George Soros bullshit you're not just that you're also an antisemite
you a smart guy and you are habesha. i think to throw around that term to loosely is a method of preventing honest dialogue. thats like not discussing sterilization of ethiopian migrants to israel due to the accusation being anti semetic... it was real and their government & media vehemently denied it.
but to get back to why i mentioned soros via open society, the general point is that the people that funding these activist seem to have interests that arent similar to the ones being protested for
you a smart guy and you are habesha. i think to throw around that term to loosely is a method of preventing honest dialogue. thats like not discussing sterilization of ethiopian migrants to israel due to the accusation being anti semetic... it was real and their government & media vehemently denied it.
but to get back to why i mentioned soros via open society, the general point is that the people that funding these activist seem to have interests that arent similar to the ones being protested for
George Soros has never funded any BLM activists through open society lol that's the thing
Israel sterilizing Ethiopian Jews is actually true
there will always be greed and people in it for the wrong reasons at the top of any major movement/organization
George Soros has never funded any BLM activists through open society lol that's the thing
Israel sterilizing Ethiopian Jews is actually true
thats for ferguson, i'll keep my eyes peeled for anything after that but i am at work lmao
opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/healing-wounds-ferguson-and-staten-island
thats for ferguson, i'll keep my eyes peeled for anything after that but i am at work lmao
https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/healing-wounds-ferguson-and-staten-island
Guess what fam BLM is not on that list
Guess what fam BLM is not on that list
from wikipedia
"Black Lives Matter have received over $100 million in funding from the Open Society Foundations, Ford Foundation and Borealis Philanthropy among others."
washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/16/black-lives-matter-cashes-100-million-liberal-foun
from wikipedia
"Black Lives Matter have received over $100 million in funding from the Open Society Foundations, Ford Foundation and Borealis Philanthropy among others."
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/16/black-lives-matter-cashes-100-million-liberal-foun/
According to various alarmist reports, Soros himself virtually single-handedly enabled and promoted protests connected with the Ferguson shooting because some of the groups involved (tangentially or otherwise) with activism-related events received some portion of their funding from the OSF network:
In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations.
The financial tether from Mr. Soros to the activist groups gave rise to a combustible protest movement that transformed a one-day criminal event in Missouri into a 24-hour-a-day national cause celebre.
Soros-sponsored organizations helped mobilize protests in Ferguson, building grass-roots coalitions on the ground backed by a nationwide online and social media campaign.
Other Soros-funded groups made it their job to remotely monitor and exploit anything related to the incident that they could portray as a conservative misstep, and to develop academic research and editorials to disseminate to the news media to keep the story alive.
But taking that information and converting it into the assertion Soros himself funded Ferguson-related protests and riots is problematic for a number of reasons. Although George Soros is the founder and chairman of OSF, he quite obviously does not personally oversee and approve every single grant made by the OSF network to the multitude of organizations and programs that the network helps to fund. As well, the $33 million figure includes just about every organization with any connection to Ferguson-related activism that received monies from the OSF network, even if their involvement was tangential (such as publishing, writing, or promoting hashtags about the issue). And that such groups may have received part of their funding from the OSF network doesn’t mean those funds were given for the specific purpose of organizing Ferguson-related protests, or with the knowledge or intent they would be used thusly.
As Kenneth Zimmerman, director of OSF’s U.S. Programs observed, some of the groups involved have been receiving OSF funding since long before the Ferguson shooting was a political issue, and the OSF itself did not promote or direct Ferguson-related protests:
According to various alarmist reports, Soros himself virtually single-handedly enabled and promoted protests connected with the Ferguson shooting because some of the groups involved (tangentially or otherwise) with activism-related events received some portion of their funding from the OSF network:
In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations.
The financial tether from Mr. Soros to the activist groups gave rise to a combustible protest movement that transformed a one-day criminal event in Missouri into a 24-hour-a-day national cause celebre.
Soros-sponsored organizations helped mobilize protests in Ferguson, building grass-roots coalitions on the ground backed by a nationwide online and social media campaign.
Other Soros-funded groups made it their job to remotely monitor and exploit anything related to the incident that they could portray as a conservative misstep, and to develop academic research and editorials to disseminate to the news media to keep the story alive.
But taking that information and converting it into the assertion Soros himself funded Ferguson-related protests and riots is problematic for a number of reasons. Although George Soros is the founder and chairman of OSF, he quite obviously does not personally oversee and approve every single grant made by the OSF network to the multitude of organizations and programs that the network helps to fund. As well, the $33 million figure includes just about every organization with any connection to Ferguson-related activism that received monies from the OSF network, even if their involvement was tangential (such as publishing, writing, or promoting hashtags about the issue). And that such groups may have received part of their funding from the OSF network doesn’t mean those funds were given for the specific purpose of organizing Ferguson-related protests, or with the knowledge or intent they would be used thusly.
As Kenneth Zimmerman, director of OSF’s U.S. Programs observed, some of the groups involved have been receiving OSF funding since long before the Ferguson shooting was a political issue, and the OSF itself did not promote or direct Ferguson-related protests:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/riot-act/
from quick research
black lives matter network global network, INC- incorporation number is 6194815. they are incorporated in delaware
search it below
icis.corp.delaware.gov/eCorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx
registered agent name:
THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY
owned by SOROS RESEARCH
opencorporates.com/companies/us_de/2367162
oh and f*** snopes
George Soros has never funded any BLM activists through open society lol that's the thing
Israel sterilizing Ethiopian Jews is actually true
I’m perhaps the most Pro Jewish person on this site lmaoo.
Also the Soros accusations are about ANTIFA not BLM I thought.
from quick research
black lives matter network global network, INC- incorporation number is 6194815. they are incorporated in delaware
search it below
https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/eCorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx
registered agent name:
THE CORPORATION TRUST COMPANY
owned by SOROS RESEARCH
https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_de/2367162
oh and f*** snopes
How do u navigate this site
Also BLM inc. It's a corporation now?
I’m perhaps the most Pro Jewish person on this site lmaoo.
Also the Soros accusations are about ANTIFA not BLM I thought.
Nah the Soros accusations are about pretty much everything that 4chan cacs think are "SJW"
I think they even say he funded occupy
Wow so happy this thread was made.
Was truly starting to think I WAS a coon. Smfh.
I knew I wasn’t tripping.
You a coon cause of your avi fam, you an anime ass nigga?