It’s a pseudo-science with unreliable application backed up with often f***ed up ideologies.
It’s basically magic crystals level.
I’m confused and I need ktt intellectuals to show me the light
social science
It’s a pseudo-science with unreliable application backed up with often f***ed up ideologies.
It’s basically magic crystals level.
It’s a pseudo-science with unreliable application backed up with often f***ed up ideologies.
It’s basically magic crystals level.
you said what?
I’m confused and I need ktt intellectuals to show me the light
It’s a social science and I think more people should learn about it
its bullshit
You think so? It kinda explains why people are the way they are
You think so? It kinda explains why people are the way they are
dont you think psychology does a better job of that?
dont you think psychology does a better job of that?
On a mass societal level? No, economics explains it better
On an individual level? Yes, psych is way better.
Funny enough apart of my business program psych was a prerequisite
You think so? It kinda explains why people are the way they are
It doesn't really
Just shut up and put this pink crystal in your ass.
Not really into that, thanks tho!
it tries to be science
i feel like its as close as you can get to science without being science lol
also I wouldn't go to this website the next time you need to be shown "the light" lol
neoclassical is pretty bs a lot of time, works off way too many assumptions
heterodox ideologies in economics are more interesting imo
It doesn't really
I think so. People have limited resources and economics is the study of how societies consume, produce and utilize those limited resources.
You can frame all of human history through the lens of economics
It’s a pseudo-science with unreliable application backed up with often f***ed up ideologies.
It’s basically magic crystals level.
Let’s say you were in charge of either raising the minimum wage or keeping it as it is, and you want to know what the outcome would be at either case. Would you say that developing economic hypotheses is a waste of time when it comes to predicting this outcome?