Reply
  • Oct 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    HURRYUPSONIC

    He really never trailed in Iowa back in 2016

    also look at this

    https://twitter.com/HenryJGomez/status/1313928272011460616

    Hmmm. It would make enough sense to let go of states his internal polling shows him losing or safely leading and put the focus on states he needs. He could lose Michigan and Wisconsin and win only Pennsylvania and still win the election

  • Oct 7, 2020
    HURRYUPSONIC

    He really never trailed in Iowa back in 2016

    also look at this

    https://twitter.com/HenryJGomez/status/1313928272011460616

    interdasting

  • Oct 7, 2020
    JT is Electric

    Suicide mission bc he there with him lol

    Thats why i say take everyone down with him

  • Oct 7, 2020

    On this day in 2016, HRC led Pennsylvania 48 to 39

  • Oct 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    HURRYUPSONIC

    He really never trailed in Iowa back in 2016

    also look at this

    https://twitter.com/HenryJGomez/status/1313928272011460616

    Trump has ran out of money for spending. There budget is depleted. While Biden has gained a bunch due to trump hate and RBG death ( someone fact check me but I believe dems raised 30m in 24 hrs after RBGs death)

  • Oct 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    soccerfanj

    Trump has ran out of money for spending. There budget is depleted. While Biden has gained a bunch due to trump hate and RBG death ( someone fact check me but I believe dems raised 30m in 24 hrs after RBGs death)

    Clinton raised and spent nearly twice as much as Trump (a difference of $450 million). Idk that the money is as important as it would appear

  • Oct 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Theory

    Clinton raised and spent nearly twice as much as Trump (a difference of $450 million). Idk that the money is as important as it would appear

    For this election it is

  • Oct 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    soccerfanj

    For this election it is

    How do you figure money is more important in 2020 than 2016? Lack of in person campaigning/rallies, requiring Trump to spend money on ads?

  • Oct 7, 2020
    HURRY UP K DOG

    Don’t look at this and be complacent. It’s only over for Trump if people actually go out and vote. So VOTE.

  • Oct 7, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Remember when Hillary decided not to campaign in Wisconsin because she thought she had it on lock?

  • Oct 8, 2020
    Theory

    How do you figure money is more important in 2020 than 2016? Lack of in person campaigning/rallies, requiring Trump to spend money on ads?

    That aspect but also the fact that trumps presidency, particularly the last 6-9 months have been a complete disaster that he can’t lie about or downplay.

    Him not being able to run as much ads as dems make him more susceptible to criticism. And he’s can’t ad chase in battlegrounds states.

    If you google it he blew money in place he wasn’t going to win like DC, VA, and more. And blowing ads on super bowl.

    Reason why it was a surprise in 2016 cuz majority of the voters were either rep that didn’t vote or moderates who decided to vote for trump. Or a depression of votes from stables of the voting bloc (Hillary hater, black voters, Hispanics, )

    It won’t be the same this time

  • Oct 8, 2020
    Noir

    Remember when Hillary decided not to campaign in Wisconsin because she thought she had it on lock?

  • Oct 8, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Pence stopped the bleeding a little bit tonight.

  • Oct 8, 2020
    ·
    4 replies

    wow

  • Oct 8, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    EuroNymous
    https://twitter.com/PpollingNumbers/status/1313981392792018944

    wow

    Hawkins lmao

  • Oct 8, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    JohnnyFive

    Hawkins lmao

    i don't think his on ballot through?

  • Oct 8, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    EuroNymous

    i don't think his on ballot through?

    I think hawkins is on all 50 states ballots same with jo jorgensen

  • Oct 8, 2020
    Snow Tha GOAT

    I think hawkins is on all 50 states ballots same with jo jorgensen

    fair enough

  • Oct 8, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    EuroNymous
    https://twitter.com/PpollingNumbers/status/1313981392792018944

    wow

    What were the numbers in 2016 at this point?

  • Oct 8, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    HURRYUPSONIC

    What were the numbers in 2016 at this point?

    he won 20+

    not too sure through

  • Oct 8, 2020
    HURRYUPSONIC

    Pence stopped the bleeding a little bit tonight.

    Need to see a battleground. Montaña wasn’t in play tbh

  • Oct 8, 2020
    EuroNymous

    he won 20+

    not too sure through

    Got it, he was up +20 at the time

    realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mt/montana_trump_vs_clinton-5893.html

  • Oct 8, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    2 replies
    Theory

    Hmmm. It would make enough sense to let go of states his internal polling shows him losing or safely leading and put the focus on states he needs. He could lose Michigan and Wisconsin and win only Pennsylvania and still win the election

    He's not winning Pennsylvania. Joe is from Scranton and is absolutely trouncing him in the polls there.

    Trump might win Florida, Iowa, Arizona (unlikely with McSally getting whipped by Kelly in the Senate race) and Ohio. but the usual rust belt Democrat strongholds (Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin) will be very, very difficult for Trump to keep when the job market is so unsteady. That was their strongest motive for flipping in 2016.

  • Oct 8, 2020
    Noir
    · edited

    He's not winning Pennsylvania. Joe is from Scranton and is absolutely trouncing him in the polls there.

    Trump might win Florida, Iowa, Arizona (unlikely with McSally getting whipped by Kelly in the Senate race) and Ohio. but the usual rust belt Democrat strongholds (Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin) will be very, very difficult for Trump to keep when the job market is so unsteady. That was their strongest motive for flipping in 2016.

    you think Joe can win PA?

  • Oct 8, 2020
    ·
    2 replies

1
...
3
4
5
...
23