Jul 2, 2020·1 reply
CarbideAndCarbonWelcome to synopsisland where if two people own two houses and get married, they will be happy to simply give up one of their houses for no reason
They should rent out the house they don’t use
Jul 2, 2020·2 repliesSo you want rental property to become government owned?
F*** that
Jul 2, 2020·1 replyUndecidedThey should rent out the house they don’t use
He doesn't believe in renting
OPJul 2, 2020
Chris Mf*** that. I dont trust fully packed busses or trains full of sick motherfuckers who still go to work and cough and sneeze everywhere. idc how clean s*** is, ppl are the worst.
That's a reality of current public transportation not what I'm advocating for
- OPJul 2, 2020·1 replyXavierMane
So you want rental property to become government owned?
F*** that
No. People owned
- Jul 2, 2020·1 replyMel
He doesn't believe in renting
Then they should leave it unoccupied and use it as storage
Jul 2, 2020Synopsispeople should not be able to rent houses because they should just, you know, have a house.
Honestly sounds crazy but isn’t that crazy when you consider that for every 1 landlord you get rid of you’re giving like 20 people secured housing and that’s a no brainer
- Jul 2, 2020·1 replySynopsis
No. People owned
So whose telling them to give up the 2nd house when they get married
Jul 2, 2020·1 replySynopsisjust dont exploit ppl and your good
All jobs exploit people.
- OPJul 2, 2020·2 repliesDVLPR
All jobs exploit people.
Right but youd be a worker not a member of the exploiting class
Jul 2, 2020·1 replySynopsisRight but youd be a worker not a member of the exploiting class
and what do you do for a living??
- Jul 2, 2020
Nothing will ever be vacant lmao
Why would you give up your second house? More space to live is always better.
- Jul 2, 2020
The second house still has use to people.
- OPJul 2, 2020·1 replyMel
So whose telling them to give up the 2nd house when they get married
It would be a law. I believe in federal government only as an administrator with limited law making abilities
- Jul 2, 2020·1 replySynopsis
It would be a law. I believe in federal government only as an administrator with limited law making abilities
Yikes
- OPJul 2, 2020·1 replyfuriousvullns
and what do you do for a living??
Why
- Jul 2, 2020·1 reply
So I have something of value in that second house and the government is telling me I have to get rid of it for free.
- OPJul 2, 2020·1 replyMel
Yikes
They'd mostly do this voluntarily tho. There'd be no use for a second house. Especially when it could serve a greater role for the community
- d stoner 🤬Jul 2, 2020·1 replyUndecided
Then they should leave it unoccupied and use it as storage
Burn it and collect the insurance money*
- Jul 2, 2020·1 replySynopsis
Why
trying to figure out if you're a member of the "exploiting class"
- Jul 2, 2020DVLPR
I knew it was you
- OPJul 2, 2020Mel
So I have something of value in that second house and the government is telling me I have to get rid of it for free.
Uh no. All the possessions in it would be yours
- Jul 2, 2020·1 replySynopsis
They'd mostly do this voluntarily tho. There'd be no use for a second house. Especially when it could serve a greater role for the community
There is use for the 2nd house though, enough people will want the extra space, in an extra location, for various reasons.
- OPJul 2, 2020furiousvullns
trying to figure out if you're a member of the "exploiting class"
I dont own any private property that could be used to exploit people
- Jul 2, 2020·1 replySynopsis
Right but youd be a worker not a member of the exploiting class
But I’m asking for a source of income that gives me time that I can allocate to good causes. A 9-5 does not provide that.