Jul 2, 2020·1 reply
SynopsisNo
So you're a egalitarian like Krishna thought
- OPJul 2, 2020
chipsone is readily replaceable, one isn't. I wouldn't have thought it was hard to figure that out
And that's why the idea that ones value should be tied to their job title is ridiculous.
- OPJul 2, 2020·2 replies
CarbideAndCarbonBack to the original topic, how exactly do you propose getting rid of landlords? Should people not be able to rent houses? If not, should people also be prohibited from renting cars/tools/equipment?
people should not be able to rent houses because they should just, you know, have a house.
Jul 2, 2020chipsi'll correct you and say pay is based upon value, which is generally a function of rarity/specificity in ability and the role's ability to generate productivity
oh I’m aware of the economic definition of pay, I just meant in a philosophical sense, I would expect someone who put more time investment into their career path would earn more pay
- Jul 2, 2020
UndecidedHello my friend
Miss you fam
- OPJul 2, 2020·1 replyMel
So you're a egalitarian like Krishna thought
if thats the idea that peoples worth comes from the mere fact they are human then yes.
- Jul 2, 2020CarbideAndCarbon
Back to the original topic, how exactly do you propose getting rid of landlords? Should people not be able to rent houses? If not, should people also be prohibited from renting cars/tools/equipment?
The guillotine, but we will have to rent that first
- Jul 2, 2020Synopsis
if thats the idea that peoples worth comes from the mere fact they are human then yes.
It's the idea they're all equal
- Jul 2, 2020·1 replySynopsis
people should not be able to rent houses because they should just, you know, have a house.
A very elegant and well thought out solution thank your for your insight professor
- Jul 2, 2020CarbideAndCarbon
Back to the original topic, how exactly do you propose getting rid of landlords? Should people not be able to rent houses? If not, should people also be prohibited from renting cars/tools/equipment?
interest is banned in the New Synopsis World, so unfortunately credit doesn't exist as no one lends things for free
If you don't have the cash up front to purchase your goods, I am afraid you are out of luck :(
- OPJul 2, 2020·1 replyCarbideAndCarbon
A very elegant and well thought out solution thank your for your insight professor
I mean tf more is there to say lmao? like, the whole idea of getting rid of landlords is that housing should not be a commodity.
- Jul 2, 2020
I am not equal to spaceghostpurpp
- OPJul 2, 2020·2 replies
And if you really want to go there, I am against cars as the primary method of transportation as well. we should be striving for a fully clean public transportation system that is free of charge
Jul 2, 2020This thread is f***ing terrible lmao.
- Jul 2, 2020·1 replySynopsis
And if you really want to go there, I am against cars as the primary method of transportation as well. we should be striving for a fully clean public transportation system that is free of charge
who is paying for this investment and it's significant maintenance (given users are not)
- OPJul 2, 2020·1 replychips
who is paying for this investment and it's significant maintenance (given users are not)
the government until we've moved pass this concept of paying for things
- Jul 2, 2020·1 replySynopsis
the government until we've moved pass this concept of paying for things
- Jul 2, 2020hot pancakes
yeah im going to bed goodnight
- Jul 2, 2020·3 repliesSynopsis
I mean tf more is there to say lmao? like, the whole idea of getting rid of landlords is that housing should not be a commodity.
Idk perhaps elaborate on how if housing isnt a commodity, who will finance its construction? What if people want to move homes? What if people get married/have children and need to expand? If this is simply publicly financed or something, who gets to decide who lives where and in what community?
- Jul 2, 2020CarbideAndCarbon
Idk perhaps elaborate on how if housing isnt a commodity, who will finance its construction? What if people want to move homes? What if people get married/have children and need to expand? If this is simply publicly financed or something, who gets to decide who lives where and in what community?
the government bro, the answer is always the government
- Jul 2, 2020CarbideAndCarbon
Idk perhaps elaborate on how if housing isnt a commodity, who will finance its construction? What if people want to move homes? What if people get married/have children and need to expand? If this is simply publicly financed or something, who gets to decide who lives where and in what community?
lot of this amounts to less freedom
- OPJul 2, 2020·1 replyCarbideAndCarbon
Idk perhaps elaborate on how if housing isnt a commodity, who will finance its construction? What if people want to move homes? What if people get married/have children and need to expand? If this is simply publicly financed or something, who gets to decide who lives where and in what community?
to answer your last question, lets say you already have a home. just because landlords are abolished doesn't mean this is no longer your home.
if people get married, ill assume one of them as a home. now they can just move in to that home, and the other home can be used for another community member if necessary.
if someone wants to move, well i guess it would depend on how far they want to move. but they could get in touch with the community they are trying to move to and see if there are any recently vacated homes that fit their needs.
- Jul 2, 2020·2 repliesSynopsis
to answer your last question, lets say you already have a home. just because landlords are abolished doesn't mean this is no longer your home.
if people get married, ill assume one of them as a home. now they can just move in to that home, and the other home can be used for another community member if necessary.
if someone wants to move, well i guess it would depend on how far they want to move. but they could get in touch with the community they are trying to move to and see if there are any recently vacated homes that fit their needs.
Welcome to synopsisland where if two people own two houses and get married, they will be happy to simply give up one of their houses for no reason
- OPJul 2, 2020CarbideAndCarbon
Welcome to synopsisland where if two people own two houses and get married, they will be happy to simply give up one of their houses for no reason
Can you provide any sort of defense as to why they'd need both houses in this scenario
Jul 2, 2020·1 replySynopsisAnd if you really want to go there, I am against cars as the primary method of transportation as well. we should be striving for a fully clean public transportation system that is free of charge
f*** that. I dont trust fully packed busses or trains full of sick motherfuckers who still go to work and cough and sneeze everywhere. idc how clean s*** is, ppl are the worst.