Yeah there is something wrong with that. There should be a 100% inheritance tax as well until capitalism is abolished
You could make a good point about inheritances but 100% is asinine and shows that you have no desire to be taken seriously
Why is there something wrong with making money from someone else's time and labor if they agree to work for you? The work is consented and agreed upon by both parties
Ah yes the voluntary exchange of labor where the only other alternative is death
You could make a good point about inheritances but 100% is asinine and shows that you have no desire to be taken seriously
Taken seriously by who? Liberal brained idiots like yourself?
Taken seriously by who? Liberal brained idiots like yourself?
Can you provide any proof that you are smart besides owning a few books?
Can you provide any proof that you are smart besides owning a few books?
Can you?
Ah yes the voluntary exchange of labor where the only other alternative is death
Humans did not choose to come into this world. We came into this world and unless you worked; you died. Idk if you believe we evolved from other species over time / agree with evolution or not but even if you don't go that far back..
Even in like the 1300s, if you didn't physically work; you would most likely die, and not due to some other humans deciding your death but bc you would starve or freeze or whatever etc.
So that's where all of this stems from.
So is the world / nature also evil bc it will naturally kill us if we do not work?
I feel like where you are going with your logic is... Since we live in a society now where the people who have a lot of wealth could take care of the people who have very little, and it would not hurt those wealthy people to do so, that it is evil for them to not do so...
To which I'd say: why is it evil for someone to not want to be responsible for another human? That doesn't seem good or evil to me it is just neutral. It is just natural
This post is dumb because the whole idea is to abolish landlords and replace them with a system where shelter isn't tied to money
Landlords aren’t the only reason shelter costs money
Shelter costs money. Abolishing landlords does not make land free, but making land free would in turn abolish landlords.
So why make the whole crux of your argument focused on one result of making land free instead of all the other possible benefits
And in your dream world where housing costs nothing how do you differentiate in the value of the houses? Because larger, nicer, better built houses in better areas will be more valuable to people even if you don’t allow it to be sold for cash. So how is it decided who lives where? And who pays the workers for building the house to begin with?
Landlords aren’t the only reason shelter costs money
Shelter costs money. Abolishing landlords does not make land free, but making land free would in turn abolish landlords.
So why make the whole crux of your argument focused on one result of making land free instead of all the other possible benefits
And in your dream world where housing costs nothing how do you differentiate in the value of the houses? Because larger, nicer, better built houses in better areas will be more valuable to people even if you don’t allow it to be sold for cash. So how is it decided who lives where? And who pays the workers for building the house to begin with?
Synopsis will just tell you something like "the people will decide all that" even though that describes the free market
That's not proof
Not even talking to you . I don't care what synopsis says I'll take his word for it bc none of this is that serious. I want to hear one accomplishment or goal he has to actually do anything other than talk on the internet. You can believe me or not I don't care bc I'm actually doing the s*** I talk about and your opinion is nothing
Not even talking to you . I don't care what synopsis says I'll take his word for it bc none of this is that serious. I want to hear one accomplishment or goal he has to actually do anything other than talk on the internet. You can believe me or not I don't care bc I'm actually doing the s*** I talk about and your opinion is nothing
If you are really a lawyer, can you give me some law advice on a business I want to run? It may be illegal but I don't think it is
If you are really a lawyer, can you give me some law advice on a business I want to run? It may be illegal but I don't think it is
I don't work for free and I'm still in school and no
I don't work for free and I'm still in school and no
Ok you may not work for free but you type for free so if this interests you to talk about then just respond with what you think
This won't be actual legal advice I know but just based off what you know so far
Uber Eats has a referral program where you receive $20 credit for signing up friends and family. I know how to sign myself up over and over again on my own referral link and essentially only pay $2 to get $20 of uber eats credit. Is that illegal? Bc I'm thinking of automating the entire process and incorporating into a company and allowing people to order food for half off while I only pay 10%
Give it to the govt they'll certainly do something altruistic with it
That’s not going to happen. I’ve asked synopsis this question like 3 times but he can’t answer me.
my entire point is, as I said im not an expert in MMT, but that taxes do not fund the government which was the initial point.
Quantitative easing is not a source of revenue, so that was a terrible example lol. Here's a breakdown of federal revenue in case you'd like to learn more and talk less out of your ass.
You might also want to check out the Dunning-Kruger effect because it probably applies to whatever you think your area of expertise is.
That’s not going to happen. I’ve asked synopsis this question like 3 times but he can’t answer me.
I dont care what you do with your inheritance
Synopsis will just tell you something like "the people will decide all that" even though that describes the free market
I've actually answered all those question multiple times itt
I dont care what you do with your inheritance
I’m asking you bro. It’s relevant to your thread. Like, if you obtain a house where you’re not planning to live in but not because you willingly bought it, what would you do with it?
U evil son of a b****
Idc how much youve personally invested in it, synopsis bill 108 says make it free
I’m asking you bro. It’s relevant to your thread. Like, if you obtain a house where you’re not planning to live in but not because you willingly bought it, what would you do with it?
In today's society or my ideal society