Zezima

4y

If I’m Tory‘s lawyer, this method is definitely the way to go. Start casting doubt on who did it, and decredit any witness that says differently. Hope Tory has a good lawyer.

Takotchi

4y

again I disagree

She could easily explain away why she lied and the court would believe it because it obviously makes sense for a victim to lie to cover up someone that's abused or harmed them because they're attached to that abuser

YallJustBeTalking

4y

Where in the article does it say Meg is concerned why Tory hasn’t been arrested yet

Zezima

4y

Not about the court though if it goes to jury. Any good lawyer would destroy her on the stand for that. Not saying she’d lose the case, but it’s definitely going to be more of a challenge now as the jury wouldn’t know whether she is telling the truth or not if she wasn’t willing to tell the truth then.

Again this isn’t about how we personally feel about the situation. This is about how just the reality of it.

She was better off never saying anything and just seeking street justice, obviously she can’t now cause it’d be too obvious she has something to do with it.

She might just have to get over it or sue him in civil court. Truly don’t believe taking this to trial will work in her best interest at this point.

Danhust

4y

I would give them every info. F*** that b****. She shot u.

DEL_245

4y

@op re-title to "sources close to Megan thee stallion" thx

Rugbycardigan

4y

I mean she can’t be that surprised. She seems to only be giving bits and pieces of the story. Still f***ed up she got shot tho. I wonder how long Tory is gonna hide from us?

BIG STEPPER SINGH

4y

· edited

Done

Danhust

4y

Didn't she protect him and lie to the cops?

Who is gonna arrest him? The fans that were watching her live when she said he shot her?

DEL_245

4y

AI

Takotchi

4y

tbh i really thought she wanted to move past all this and not get any civil authority involved

regardless, what im saying is that tory's counsel in this case doesn't have much to stand on to destroy meg just off the fact that she lied. her team could easily spin that in her favor

if meg and her lawyer team dropped a fat testimony on tory's baldass head then it's gonna look tough out there for him--especially with the clear evidence that he shot her; whatever they go to court for tory is at a pretty substantial disadvantage imo

Danhust

4y

I would give them every info. F*** that b****. She shot u.

Zezima

4y

-69?

MiguelMeyerz

4y

That's not how it works.

She didn't lie under oath so I'm not sure how a court will view her as a witness.

But in court once your testimony is seen as not credible, you aren't credible. It doesn't matter how or what you "explain".

Zezima

4y

Hold on..

What clear evidence, that has been presented besides hearsay, is there actually?

I mean if they found his prints on the gun and proof that it was fired. like bullet casings, then I believe he would have already been charged.

Like what I’m pretty much saying is, I’m sure Tory is guilty but a good lawyer could definitely potentially get him off since you are innocent until proven guilty even if Twitter feels differently about that.

There’s not really any concrete evidence, the victim has lied and nobody else that we know of has corroborated her version of the story or has been willing to testify.

Honestly the only thing meg has in her favor at this point is that Tory is a black man, which can definitely do you in historically speaking depending on the jury.

Still believe a good lawyer could get him off in court.

MORROW

4y

Kylie was the one that hit The trigger

Takotchi

4y

All we have to go off of really is the "sorry" text, but smartly tory didn't flat out say "hey sorry for shooting you" so it would hard to straight up say he did it without proof on the gun itself yeah

Takotchi

4y

Even if the testimony isn't seen as entirely credible, Meg would be still be looked as a recanting victim of domestic violence period. Yes perjury harms the integrity of any justice system: criminal, civil or otherwise, but perjury in a domestic violence case isn't that simple to deal with.

The court would likely look at the "why" behind the lie to judge whether or not it's suitable for punishment anyway. Because the reasons for a victim of domestic violence to lie and cover for their abuser are going to latently be complex and involved--considering a number of different issues, including psychological trauma, external
pressures from the opposition, etc.

They're not just going to write her off as completely untrustworthy. That doesn't make sense

I dont think a trial is coming out of this either but if there were one I wouldn't think meg would be in for any substantial trouble for lying. Just look at the x situation with his girlfriend Geneva. That girl had like 12 different stories but she was managing just fine in the court room.