Sep 10, 2020
ZezimaIf I’m Tory‘s lawyer, this method is definitely the way to go. Start casting doubt on who did it, and decredit any witness that says differently. Hope Tory has a good lawyer.
Just say it was Kylie
Sep 10, 2020·1 reply
Takotchiagain I disagree
She could easily explain away why she lied and the court would believe it because it obviously makes sense for a victim to lie to cover up someone that's abused or harmed them because they're attached to that abuser
That's not how it works.
She didn't lie under oath so I'm not sure how a court will view her as a witness.
But in court once your testimony is seen as not credible, you aren't credible. It doesn't matter how or what you "explain".
Sep 10, 2020·edited
YallJustBeTalkingWhere in the article does it say Meg is concerned why Tory hasn’t been arrested yet
it doesn't, op just wants a hit thread or sumthin
- Sep 10, 2020·1 replyZezima
Not about the court though if it goes to jury. Any good lawyer would destroy her on the stand for that. Not saying she’d lose the case, but it’s definitely going to be more of a challenge now as the jury wouldn’t know whether she is telling the truth or not if she wasn’t willing to tell the truth then.
Again this isn’t about how we personally feel about the situation. This is about how just the reality of it.
She was better off never saying anything and just seeking street justice, obviously she can’t now cause it’d be too obvious she has something to do with it.
She might just have to get over it or sue him in civil court. Truly don’t believe taking this to trial will work in her best interest at this point.
tbh i really thought she wanted to move past all this and not get any civil authority involved
regardless, what im saying is that tory's counsel in this case doesn't have much to stand on to destroy meg just off the fact that she lied. her team could easily spin that in her favor
if meg and her lawyer team dropped a fat testimony on tory's baldass head then it's gonna look tough out there for him--especially with the clear evidence that he shot her; whatever they go to court for tory is at a pretty substantial disadvantage imo
- Sep 10, 2020Danhust
I would give them every info. F*** that b****. She shot u.
😭😭😭😭
Sep 10, 2020·edited·1 replyDEL_245@op re-title to "sources close to Megan thee stallion" thx
Done
- Sep 10, 2020
RugbycardiganI mean she can’t be that surprised. She seems to only be giving bits and pieces of the story. Still f***ed up she got shot tho. I wonder how long Tory is gonna hide from us?
- Sep 10, 2020BIG STEPPER SINGH· edited
Done
Sep 10, 2020DanhustDidn't she protect him and lie to the cops?
Who is gonna arrest him? The fans that were watching her live when she said he shot her?
Lmao real villain s***
- Sep 10, 2020
At least she earned a new fan
Sep 10, 2020·1 replyKylie was the one that hit The trigger
Sep 10, 2020DEL_245AI
Sep 10, 2020Man just get this s*** over with.
- Sep 10, 2020·1 replyTakotchi
tbh i really thought she wanted to move past all this and not get any civil authority involved
regardless, what im saying is that tory's counsel in this case doesn't have much to stand on to destroy meg just off the fact that she lied. her team could easily spin that in her favor
if meg and her lawyer team dropped a fat testimony on tory's baldass head then it's gonna look tough out there for him--especially with the clear evidence that he shot her; whatever they go to court for tory is at a pretty substantial disadvantage imo
Hold on..
What clear evidence, that has been presented besides hearsay, is there actually?
I mean if they found his prints on the gun and proof that it was fired. like bullet casings, then I believe he would have already been charged.
Like what I’m pretty much saying is, I’m sure Tory is guilty but a good lawyer could definitely potentially get him off since you are innocent until proven guilty even if Twitter feels differently about that.
There’s not really any concrete evidence, the victim has lied and nobody else that we know of has corroborated her version of the story or has been willing to testify.
Honestly the only thing meg has in her favor at this point is that Tory is a black man, which can definitely do you in historically speaking depending on the jury.
Still believe a good lawyer could get him off in court.
- Sep 10, 2020·1 replyDanhust
I would give them every info. F*** that b****. She shot u.
-69?
Sep 10, 2020Lol what does she expect. Its court. The s*** takes time. Plus we know his next court date in October ane he bailed out.
- Sep 10, 2020Zezima
-69?
6ix would have given her the Reese combo first.
- Sep 10, 2020·1 replyMiguelMeyerz
That's not how it works.
She didn't lie under oath so I'm not sure how a court will view her as a witness.
But in court once your testimony is seen as not credible, you aren't credible. It doesn't matter how or what you "explain".
Even if the testimony isn't seen as entirely credible, Meg would be still be looked as a recanting victim of domestic violence period. Yes perjury harms the integrity of any justice system: criminal, civil or otherwise, but perjury in a domestic violence case isn't that simple to deal with.
The court would likely look at the "why" behind the lie to judge whether or not it's suitable for punishment anyway. Because the reasons for a victim of domestic violence to lie and cover for their abuser are going to latently be complex and involved--considering a number of different issues, including psychological trauma, external
pressures from the opposition, etc.They're not just going to write her off as completely untrustworthy. That doesn't make sense
I dont think a trial is coming out of this either but if there were one I wouldn't think meg would be in for any substantial trouble for lying. Just look at the x situation with his girlfriend Geneva. That girl had like 12 different stories but she was managing just fine in the court room.
- Sep 10, 2020·1 replyZezima
Hold on..
What clear evidence, that has been presented besides hearsay, is there actually?
I mean if they found his prints on the gun and proof that it was fired. like bullet casings, then I believe he would have already been charged.
Like what I’m pretty much saying is, I’m sure Tory is guilty but a good lawyer could definitely potentially get him off since you are innocent until proven guilty even if Twitter feels differently about that.
There’s not really any concrete evidence, the victim has lied and nobody else that we know of has corroborated her version of the story or has been willing to testify.
Honestly the only thing meg has in her favor at this point is that Tory is a black man, which can definitely do you in historically speaking depending on the jury.
Still believe a good lawyer could get him off in court.
All we have to go off of really is the "sorry" text, but smartly tory didn't flat out say "hey sorry for shooting you" so it would hard to straight up say he did it without proof on the gun itself yeah
Sep 10, 2020MORROWKylie was the one that hit The trigger
You know too much.
- Sep 10, 2020·1 replyTakotchi
All we have to go off of really is the "sorry" text, but smartly tory didn't flat out say "hey sorry for shooting you" so it would hard to straight up say he did it without proof on the gun itself yeah
Exactly. There is not clear cut evidence that he did it. If Tory won it be due to lack of evidence especially since the victim would already be potentially seen as not credible. And with nobody corroborating her story it’s simple he said/ she said, which is typically not enough to convict someone.
Her best bet at this point is maybe settling out of court with Tory.
- Sep 10, 2020
She didn’t press charges
- Sep 10, 2020·edited·1 replyTakotchi
Even if the testimony isn't seen as entirely credible, Meg would be still be looked as a recanting victim of domestic violence period. Yes perjury harms the integrity of any justice system: criminal, civil or otherwise, but perjury in a domestic violence case isn't that simple to deal with.
The court would likely look at the "why" behind the lie to judge whether or not it's suitable for punishment anyway. Because the reasons for a victim of domestic violence to lie and cover for their abuser are going to latently be complex and involved--considering a number of different issues, including psychological trauma, external
pressures from the opposition, etc.They're not just going to write her off as completely untrustworthy. That doesn't make sense
I dont think a trial is coming out of this either but if there were one I wouldn't think meg would be in for any substantial trouble for lying. Just look at the x situation with his girlfriend Geneva. That girl had like 12 different stories but she was managing just fine in the court room.
I understand what you are saying, I've just never heard of it working like that. I see this all time online.
I just don't know where the idea came from that the court system has different standards for perjury depending on the crime.
The standard for a criminal case is "beyond a reasonable doubt" changing the story introduces doubt. I'm not speak directly to the Meg situation but rather to the point you made.
- Sep 10, 2020·2 replies
If Melly beating a double murder, Tory can beat this.