mj was just a weird ass dude man he wasnt f***ing any kids idk how much more obvious it could get
mj slander is sickening
still find it weird he was sleeping with kids idc
1st oage on classic
At this point I just need a sit down 60 minutes style interview with OP to breakdown their relation to Michael as an artist n why they devote such time & energy to this specific thing 95% of people been made up their mind about alrdy
Honestly, it's just something that absolutely fascinates me. People write about their interests all the time and this is really no different.
At this point I just need a sit down 60 minutes style interview with OP to breakdown their relation to Michael as an artist n why they devote such time & energy to this specific thing 95% of people been made up their mind about alrdy
you think 95% think he’s guilty or innocent?
still find it weird he was sleeping with kids idc
same, definitely wasnt okay to be doing and i dont really know what made him think it was fine, but at the end of the day i dont think he touched any kids or harmed them, and thats really what i care about
you think 95% think he’s guilty or innocent?
I think people are just done with it
He did some OD grey area s***, any discourse about it is really more about signalling your own perceived moral power levels & personal philosophies on the internet than settling a case
Edit: I guess this is true of anythung tho maybe I’m just cranky . My bad lol
'MJ innocent series'
OP works for MJs defence team i think. These threads always have way too much detail
still find it weird he was sleeping with kids idc
weird sure, but theres a massive difference between saying someone is weird and saying someone is a pedo.
he was wrongly accused of the latter which is the issue
If you’re open to critique, I don’t have a strong opinion on whether he’s guilty or innocent but the very first sentence of the “origins of the lawsuit” section comes off pretty biased and unprofessional (I know it’s a forum post but for a poster with your focus it has to be a little more objective). And I’m gonna go back and read it and it could be true, it’s just I feel like as far as writing, you showed your hand a little too much too soon. Saying off top with no context that because it was sealed the person must have been doing a cash grab seems questionable and more like bias than logic.
Anyone coming at @KingOfPop for this is whack af. One of the few people on here to bring real discussion and information to a site full of trolls
Elites were kicking back and laughing dragging that man through the mud while they chilled on pedo island
Hell, most people already stopped caring about Epstein and the Lolita express
Most people have way more pressing matters than worrying about what rich people do, yeah it’s f***ed up but do we honestly have the time or energy to care? Don’t pin the rich actions on the poor like we’re supposed to stop it somehow with some tweets or something