Reply
  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    Spliff Sparxxx

    again where there is smoke there is fire - all these allegations cannot be coming from nowhere. why won't you admit this?

    that's why i said you are a bad person

    He literally has debunked everything you’ve tried to say and instead of just taking your L and moving on you keep saying “durrrr smoke fire he guilty”

    Just stfu man

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    SHAQUILLE

    He literally has debunked everything you’ve tried to say and instead of just taking your L and moving on you keep saying “durrrr smoke fire he guilty”

    Just stfu man

    he didnt debunk s***

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    M2

    IDC IF IT'S "LEGAL P***O" ITS NAKED KIDS

    IN A ROOM WHERE HE ADMITTED TO SLEEPING WITH KIDS

    Framed???? IT DOESN'T SAY THAT

    He also had "Barely Legal" magazines

  • Nov 3, 2020
    Spliff Sparxxx

    he didnt debunk s***

    Pretty sure I have.

    You literally said you didn't know about the 1993 case so you are resorting to some BS about smoke and fire.

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    every mj hater makes themselves look braindead when they enter this thread

  • Nov 3, 2020

    Co worker randomly asked last night in our work group chat if we thought Michael Jackson was guilty . There was only 4 of us in but we all agreed hes innocent asf

  • Nov 3, 2020
    Spliff Sparxxx

    Bro your quoting a racist grown ass man who pretends to be a teenage girl on a Kanye forum.

    You down bad lmaooo

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    KingOfPop

    God you really can not read. The fingerprints were taken when Sneddon gave Arvizo a magazine with no gloves on in 2004.

    Your own article says the following:

    “One of Jackson's lawyers, Robert Sanger, also got one expert to admit that the fingerprints on the magazines could not be dated.“

    Why are you now trying so hard to be the “e-lawyer”? Do you take comfort in pretending children were molested?

    45 year old man has legal p*** collection so he must be a pedophile? What sort of logic is this?

    Makes Neverland for the kids

    Stockpiles it with barely legal magazines

    Makes sense

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    M2

    Makes Neverland for the kids

    Stockpiles it with barely legal magazines

    Makes sense

    45 year old man has legal p***ography in his house (from memory in locked locations).

    If that’s the best you got..

  • Nov 3, 2020
    Shabazz999

    every mj hater makes themselves look braindead when they enter this thread

    Because they are bro. No facts or evidence other than hope children were molested and big bad MJ was the evil guy the press told them he was.

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    KingOfPop

    45 year old man has legal p***ography in his house (from memory in locked locations).

    If that’s the best you got..

    He’s projecting

  • Nov 3, 2020
    SHAQUILLE

    He’s projecting

    The whole barely legal s*** is hilarious.

    If he was a pedophile it wouldn’t be legal. That’s the whole point.

  • Nov 3, 2020

    Damn I already thought MJ was innocent, but knowing M2 disagrees really reaffirms that for me.

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    KingOfPop

    45 year old man has legal p***ography in his house (from memory in locked locations).

    If that’s the best you got..

    Kids fingerprints on 3 different mags

  • Nov 3, 2020
    SHAQUILLE

    He’s projecting

    Shaquille please learn what these big words mean before posting

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    M2

    Kids fingerprints on 3 different mags

    Already explained why that is no form of proof.

    Do you know the story of the Arvizo children and how they behave? Context is everything.

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    KingOfPop

    Already explained why that is no form of proof.

    Do you know the story of the Arvizo children and how they behave? Context is everything.

    Fingerprints isn't proof? 💀

    We blaming the kids now?

    Sick f-ck

  • Nov 3, 2020
  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    M2

    Fingerprints isn't proof? 💀

    We blaming the kids now?

    Sick f-ck

    What exactly is it proof of?

    Not even the prosecution claimed what you are.

    The children admitted to rummaging through Jackson’s property when he wasn’t there. This is in court record. It’s a fact.

    The claim is that Jackson used this p***ography to molest Gavin, is it not?

    How come in the Arvizo tale of events they do not corroborate with this?

    Gavin told us on the stand Jackson took the material off them and told them it was Frank Cascio’s. But I thought Jackson was showing them this p***ography to lower their sexual inhibitions to molest them. That does not add up.

    Why would Jackson distance himself from the material if he was using it to molest these children? Why did the Arvizo’s never claim abuse following this?

    This was the prosecution’s “smoking gun” in the 2005 trial but because of the way those children behave and the fact they admitted to sleeping in and going through Jackson’s room when he wasn’t even there speaks volumes.

    This is how that family behaved. They did it at dentists offices. They did it elsewhere. Jay Leno and Chris Tucker were other celebrities the Arvizo’s tried to scam.

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    interstellarflyin2

    I just can't get over the part of him sleeping in bed with kids even though he probably didn't harm them. Still sus as hell no doubt

    Again another false narrative taken out of context & warped by the media to make MJ to like a monster

    Gavin Arvizo & the 2nd child wanted to go in MJ’s room, he said he’d only allow it with his mother’s consent

    Janet Arvizo said they could spend the night in Michael’s room, Michael said he “ shared his bed with them “

    Michael and his bodyguard slept on the floor while the children slept on the bed

    He publicly admitted to it himself that was consensual, Martin Bashir edited the interview so it would be purposely taken out of context to cause shock value for TV ratings

  • Nov 3, 2020

    serious question how many hours a day do you spend thinking about mj op

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    MJ sharing room with children sounds strange until you realize his bedroom is 2 stories & the size of an entire apartment

    All of it was taken out of context

    But I guess offering your bed to children automatically means you have sexually intentions

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Sunny Sun
    · edited

    Again another false narrative taken out of context & warped by the media to make MJ to like a monster

    Gavin Arvizo & the 2nd child wanted to go in MJ’s room, he said he’d only allow it with his mother’s consent

    Janet Arvizo said they could spend the night in Michael’s room, Michael said he “ shared his bed with them “

    Michael and his bodyguard slept on the floor while the children slept on the bed

    He publicly admitted to it himself that was consensual, Martin Bashir edited the interview so it would be purposely taken out of context to cause shock value for TV ratings

    MJ was already wary of the Arvizo family and asked Frank Cascio a family friend to be in the room with them. MJ and Frank slept elsewhere while the children took the bed. This is not contested. This is fact.

  • Nov 3, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    KingOfPop

    MJ was already wary of the Arvizo family and asked Frank Cascio a family friend to be in the room with them. MJ and Frank slept elsewhere while the children took the bed. This is not contested. This is fact.

    Exactly

    It was all Martin bashir, he purposely did that to make MJ look sick

    He even told MJ & Gavin hold hands then edited it out of the video to make it look like Michael was being perverted

1
...
14
15
16
...
28