He literally has debunked everything you’ve tried to say and instead of just taking your L and moving on you keep saying “durrrr smoke fire he guilty”

Just stfu man

he didnt debunk s***

Pretty sure I have.

You literally said you didn't know about the 1993 case so you are resorting to some BS about smoke and fire.

every mj hater makes themselves look braindead when they enter this thread

Co worker randomly asked last night in our work group chat if we thought Michael Jackson was guilty . There was only 4 of us in but we all agreed hes innocent asf

Bro your quoting a racist grown ass man who pretends to be a teenage girl on a Kanye forum.

You down bad lmaooo

Makes Neverland for the kids

Stockpiles it with barely legal magazines

Makes sense

45 year old man has legal p***ography in his house (from memory in locked locations).

If that’s the best you got..

Because they are bro. No facts or evidence other than hope children were molested and big bad MJ was the evil guy the press told them he was.

He’s projecting

The whole barely legal s*** is hilarious.

If he was a pedophile it wouldn’t be legal. That’s the whole point.

Damn I already thought MJ was innocent, but knowing M2 disagrees really reaffirms that for me.

Kids fingerprints on 3 different mags

Shaquille please learn what these big words mean before posting

Already explained why that is no form of proof.

Do you know the story of the Arvizo children and how they behave? Context is everything.

Fingerprints isn't proof? 💀

We blaming the kids now?

Sick f-ck

What exactly is it proof of?

Not even the prosecution claimed what you are.

The children admitted to rummaging through Jackson’s property when he wasn’t there. This is in court record. It’s a fact.

The claim is that Jackson used this p***ography to molest Gavin, is it not?

How come in the Arvizo tale of events they do not corroborate with this?

Gavin told us on the stand Jackson took the material off them and told them it was Frank Cascio’s. But I thought Jackson was showing them this p***ography to lower their sexual inhibitions to molest them. That does not add up.

Why would Jackson distance himself from the material if he was using it to molest these children? Why did the Arvizo’s never claim abuse following this?

This was the prosecution’s “smoking gun” in the 2005 trial but because of the way those children behave and the fact they admitted to sleeping in and going through Jackson’s room when he wasn’t even there speaks volumes.

This is how that family behaved. They did it at dentists offices. They did it elsewhere. Jay Leno and Chris Tucker were other celebrities the Arvizo’s tried to scam.

Again another false narrative taken out of context & warped by the media to make MJ to like a monster

Gavin Arvizo & the 2nd child wanted to go in MJ’s room, he said he’d only allow it with his mother’s consent

Janet Arvizo said they could spend the night in Michael’s room, Michael said he “ shared his bed with them “

Michael and his bodyguard slept on the floor while the children slept on the bed

He publicly admitted to it himself that was consensual, Martin Bashir edited the interview so it would be purposely taken out of context to cause shock value for TV ratings

serious question how many hours a day do you spend thinking about mj op

MJ sharing room with children sounds strange until you realize his bedroom is 2 stories & the size of an entire apartment

All of it was taken out of context

But I guess offering your bed to children automatically means you have sexually intentions

MJ was already wary of the Arvizo family and asked Frank Cascio a family friend to be in the room with them. MJ and Frank slept elsewhere while the children took the bed. This is not contested. This is fact.

Exactly

It was all Martin bashir, he purposely did that to make MJ look sick

He even told MJ & Gavin hold hands then edited it out of the video to make it look like Michael was being perverted