Hoppe or Rothbard
There is no difference between the two since Rothbard accepted Hoppe's conclusions in the 90s, but I know what you mean.
Hoppe. My ideal government is Liechtenstein w/ stronger ties to the Catholic Church.
There is no difference between the two since Rothbard accepted Hoppe's conclusions in the 90s, but I know what you mean.
Hoppe. My ideal government is Liechtenstein w/ stronger ties to the Catholic Church.
I don’t see this as sustainable under a capitalist structure. In a vacuum as part of a wider world where that country exists sure, it’s viable as an outlier at least temporally, but there’s no way the entire world could ever be structured realistically or pragmatically to support this post-industrial revolution
The OP of this thread consistently gets banned and a new one gets made.
I don’t see this as sustainable under a capitalist structure. In a vacuum as part of a wider world where that country exists sure, it’s viable as an outlier at least temporally, but there’s no way the entire world could ever be structured realistically or pragmatically to support this post-industrial revolution
This is true. I dont think every country is going to adopt this model. It's the best model though imo.
The OP of this thread consistently gets banned and a new one gets made.
Really? I guess I'll break the curse.
Making a playlist for people like us. Already have
What else???
Making a playlist for people like us. Already have
What else???
don't forget MORRISSEY!
On July 19th buy a hot or iced coffee and 100% of the proceeds will help change youth lives
Only in participating Tim Hortons locations
This is true. I dont think every country is going to adopt this model. It's the best model though imo.
What prevents citizens from emigrating to a place like the US for economic opportunity and this dropping fertility and economic growth over time? Is the idea that nationalistic sentiment and religion would overpower that?
What prevents citizens from emigrating to a place like the US for economic opportunity and this dropping fertility and economic growth over time? Is the idea that nationalistic sentiment and religion would overpower that?
I don't think open-borders are unique to any nation. It's more natural for borders to be close and only open to a select group or individuals. You can't move unless the country lets you live there.
I don't think open-borders are unique to any nation. It's more natural for borders to be close and only open to a select group or individuals. You can't move unless the country lets you live there.
I know, but the reality is we live in a world where that is the case. Beliefs realistically have to have pragmatic basis in their ability to be enacted or else they are essentially just idealistic LARPs
I know, but the reality is we live in a world where that is the case. Beliefs realistically have to have pragmatic basis in their ability to be enacted or else they are essentially just idealistic LARPs
So you are asking me right now under the current world, if we had a government like mine, how would that stop an open-border? Liechenstein doesn't have one. I don't know how they do it specifically, but they do. I don't think Switzerland has one as well.
On July 19th buy a hot or iced coffee and 100% of the proceeds will help change youth lives
Only in participating Tim Hortons locations
Tim Hortons
So you are asking me right now under the current world, if we had a government like mine, how would that stop an open-border? Liechenstein doesn't have one. I don't know how they do it specifically, but they do. I don't think Switzerland has one as well.
This is only part of what I’m asking. I mean Lichtenstein exists, sure, but so does say, Bhutan. These are exceptions to the rule essentially. I’m more asking how this type of thing can be enacted without being exceptions. I don’t think if your ideology rests on being an exception it’s a serious one
On July 19th buy a hot or iced coffee and 100% of the proceeds will help change youth lives
Only in participating Tim Hortons locations
canadian detected
This is only part of what I’m asking. I mean Lichtenstein exists, sure, but so does say, Bhutan. These are exceptions to the rule essentially. I’m more asking how this type of thing can be enacted without being exceptions. I don’t think if your ideology rests on being an exception it’s a serious one
Would you really compare Bhutan to Liechenstein? I'm not sure what you are asking me at this point. Are you basically asking me how a nation like mine would form? Are you asking me how immigration would be handled? Are you asking me in real-time how these things would form or be handled?
Would you really compare Bhutan to Liechenstein? I'm not sure what you are asking me at this point. Are you basically asking me how a nation like mine would form? Are you asking me how immigration would be handled? Are you asking me in real-time how these things would form or be handled?
I’m just asking what basis the belief system you’re discussing has in practicality. Like it’s cool you think Lichtenstein is doing things right but that doesn’t mean anything material. I’m trying to understand what ideology you actually have rather than what individual concepts you just think are cool/aren’t cool within the status quo