So does that mean now that instead of saying "I mean it's no Citizen Kane or anything" we should now say "Well I mean it's no Paddington 2 or anything" when we review movies?
So does that mean now that instead of saying "I mean it's no Citizen Kane or anything" we should now say "Well I mean it's no Paddington 2 or anything" when we review movies?
precisely. there's a new bear in town
lmaooo that review is actually pretty contentious. they did not have to go with "Rotten" for it
basically the critic didn't agree with it being the greatest film ever and that was considered a bad review
godfather 2 out now
godfather part 1 does everything it needs to. Perfect movie. 2nd part was admittedly a cash grab for all parties involved. Still a good movie but probably shouldn’t be top 50.
godfather part 1 does everything it needs to. Perfect movie. 2nd part was admittedly a cash grab for all parties involved. Still a good movie but probably shouldn’t be top 50.
godfather 2 better than the first in every way
godfather part 1 does everything it needs to. Perfect movie. 2nd part was admittedly a cash grab for all parties involved. Still a good movie but probably shouldn’t be top 50.
Dawg what the f***?
Odd to characterize it as a cash grab when it had such a clear purpose. Extended the story perfectly and filled details from the original book that the first film couldn’t get to like Vitos background
Got pretty much the same acclaim and went right back to win best picture as a sequel. Cash grabs typically have no solid purpose but this clearly did
I can’t believe some of y’all are really hurt about this lmao
Yall? Lmao that’s Rosebud ass tripping. Nigga ain’t even seen the movie yet swear up and downn it’s mid
So does that mean now that instead of saying "I mean it's no Citizen Kane or anything" we should now say "Well I mean it's no Paddington 2 or anything" when we review movies?
Yes
I can’t believe some of y’all are really hurt about this lmao
Pretentious MFs mad as s*** word to @Reformed