They not selling copies of it for $50mil. They're selling it for $30 lol. What if 10 million people bought your Pikachu riding a bike for $50? Does that make it not OK? Fanart is absolutely NOT selling more of the IP. You can buy official art of Pokemon. Fanart is actively taking money from Pokemon. There is no difference.
Again, would it be better if they just called it Pokemon and filled it with 1:1 Pokemon? That would be selling more of the IP, right?
Fair Use law exists for a reason. That's why Scary Movie, Epic Movie, and other s*** doesn't get sued to oblivion. That's why Joseph Joestar can look identical to the nigga from Fist of the North Star and not get sued. That's why South Park can do what they do and not get sued. As long as you don't steal assets (not remake assets, literally use the same assets that they used in their games), call it the same name, or pretend to be it... you're pretty much good lol.
they're obviously not selling for $50mil a pop dont be grammar police my nigga. the difference is that the fanart is of actual pokemon and is stated to be of actual pokemon. palworld has look-a-likes of actual pokemon and is stated to be palworldmon
the other difference is also the money being made like it or not
guarantee if an artist got big enough selling fanart they're getting that c&d. but again fan art is fan art. and even though it'd be a good insult, palworld isn't fanart lmaooo
They not selling copies of it for $50mil. They're selling it for $30 lol. What if 10 million people bought your Pikachu riding a bike for $50? Does that make it not OK? Fanart is absolutely NOT selling more of the IP. You can buy official art of Pokemon. Fanart is actively taking money from Pokemon. There is no difference.
Again, would it be better if they just called it Pokemon and filled it with 1:1 Pokemon? That would be selling more of the IP, right?
Fair Use law exists for a reason. That's why Scary Movie, Epic Movie, and other s*** doesn't get sued to oblivion. That's why Joseph Joestar can look identical to the nigga from Fist of the North Star and not get sued. That's why South Park can do what they do and not get sued. As long as you don't steal assets (not remake assets, literally use the same assets that they used in their games), call it the same name, or pretend to be it... you're pretty much good lol.
to your edit. legally sure, but we're talking morally. and they have taken actual assets too lol
we were having a normal convo too you starting to type too much as well like water giver
they're obviously not selling for $50mil a pop dont be grammar police my nigga. the difference is that the fanart is of actual pokemon and is stated to be of actual pokemon. palworld has look-a-likes of actual pokemon and is stated to be palworldmon
the other difference is also the money being made like it or not
guarantee if an artist got big enough selling fanart they're getting that c&d. but again fan art is fan art. and even though it'd be a good insult, palworld isn't fanart lmaooo
You not answering my question. Would it be better if they just called it Pokemon and filled it with literal Pokemon lol? Good luck C&D fanart. Doujinshi have been around for like 60 years
bro comparing fanart to something that isnt fanart. what am i doing here
I'm doing so to make a point, you can use that thing inside ya noggin, can't ya?
So far nobody has proven that they've taken assets. Like, at all.
I'm doing so to make a point, you can use that thing inside ya noggin, can't ya?
So far nobody has proven that they've taken assets. Like, at all.
these forum ass responses bro talk regular, you don't talk like that fr
the proof is out there
You not answering my question. Would it be better if they just called it Pokemon and filled it with literal Pokemon lol? Good luck C&D fanart. Doujinshi have been around for like 60 years
it would be better if their designs were original
Doujinshi isn't fanart
What do you think of the game and situation since you are one of 5 people that actually likes to talk about games in the gaming section and one of the 3 that actually know what theyre talking about @Aquilla
Idk if its your type of thing in this kind of genre but I find it really interesting & surprised there hasnt been a bigger push earlier on main consoles - game doesnt look good imo buts its success is undeniable
Outside of the ones from the literal time of Pokemons inception most of the other attempts were on 3ds, especially in the last 10 years
And its probably going down as one of the most successful games ever - def at least on steam which i didnt see coming AND theyre a Indie/Double A studio
Always been a missed niche that Gamefreak has been lazily coasting on for multiple years now its wild
From the way these PALS are, I like how they're not useless. I felt Pokemons aside from attacking weren't really that active and felt useless. The character designs are pretty cool, cutesy. This one and DokeV might be the only ones to have nailed this aspect imo plus they both had the uniqueness factor to booth. Gameplay wise, there's an influence of EA's Spore in terms of the crossbreeding and legacy s***. There was a game that had this style in terms of action but I forgot it's name. It seems cool and it's dope that it's on Steam. However, despite my praise for it, I don't feel enticed to play it but I dive more into it tho
Lmao it’s hilarious how obvious the copying is
https://twitter.com/genki_jpn/status/1749256678791622721Luxray is the most hilarious to me lmao
They just added yellow lines to it and changed the ears, the mf is basically the same lmao
Lmao it’s hilarious how obvious the copying is
https://twitter.com/genki_jpn/status/1749256678791622721Nintendo and Gamefreak deserve that s***
Lmao it’s hilarious how obvious the copying is
https://twitter.com/genki_jpn/status/1749256678791622721Real. I'd buy this and check it out but Nintendo gonna send the shooters and this getting removed within 3 months max
surprisingly good game.
it even looks like it’s using Fortnite graphic assets, this is gonna blow up.
Lmao it’s hilarious how obvious the copying is
https://twitter.com/genki_jpn/status/1749256678791622721that Zoroark + Houndoom pal character design tho
i don’t care if they copy pokemon or nintendo
i hope they keep “copying” too they deserve it
Idk why people care about it using AI or copying designs lol
I think Nintendo got enough here they could open a lawsuit. I don't think it's enough to win, but Nintendo also doesn't mind bleeding people the f*** out in court either
My man said they didn’t steal assets and compared it to South Park doing a one off episode with someone’s likeness
South Park is an original creation
Game is a smash hit
Jus goes to show how little ktt in tune
What does that prove ?
yall complain too much just enjoy the game