Anything on what allowed the capitalist reforms to take place
From Victory to Defeat by Pao-Yu Ching is great
Free PDF here, and there’s also an audio book format on all streaming services and Foreign Language Press website
foreignlanguages.press/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/N01-From-Victory-to-Defeat-7th-Printing.pdf
She also contributed to this amazing work, Re-Thinking Socialism. It’s more of an explication of the Maoist conception of socialism, but uses a lot of historical examples to compare and contrast China during and post Mao. I think FLP also has an audiobook of this as well
foreignlanguages.press/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/S11-Rethinking-Socialism-7th-Printing.pdf
I still need to read this last one, but William Hinton is amazing and a great historian, so I’m sure it’s great. This one will likely have the most historical nitty gritty to it if you’re looking for that, whereas the first two are more political-economy
ive been actually wondering for a while what is the extent of your opposition to the cpc @cloud_rap
Critical support for China against Western imperialism
Oppose China for its capitalist ways and foreign policy weakness
The party elite is basically using Singapore-style state capitalism to develop their country, which works better than neoliberalism of course. But it isn't socialism, so it has all the contradictions that capitalism usually has. For example, making the birth rate sink because you overwork the population.
State capitalism is preferable to neoliberalism, but it is inferior to socialism.
The party base has opportunists, careerists, but also "true believers" who hold on dearly to people like Mao and genuinely believe in socialism, albeit also believing that an extended era of capitalism is needed first.
The party elite has a hold on the bourgeoisie there by various means (such as finance being mostly nationalized), but this doesn't really mean much. There is a quote where Stalin says that Hitler killing off unloyal millionaires doesn't make Nazi Germany socialist.
Also, the idea of socialism in China often is equivalent to social democratic welfarism of Scandinavia.
The party legitimizes itself by being connected to the Chinese Revolution and the Mao era, which despite all its catastrophes is seen as a positive event in Chinese history. The red paint makes a lot of people happy.
Critical support for China against Western imperialism
Oppose China for its capitalist ways and foreign policy weakness
The party elite is basically using Singapore-style state capitalism to develop their country, which works better than neoliberalism of course. But it isn't socialism, so it has all the contradictions that capitalism usually has. For example, making the birth rate sink because you overwork the population.
State capitalism is preferable to neoliberalism, but it is inferior to socialism.
The party base has opportunists, careerists, but also "true believers" who hold on dearly to people like Mao and genuinely believe in socialism, albeit also believing that an extended era of capitalism is needed first.
The party elite has a hold on the bourgeoisie there by various means (such as finance being mostly nationalized), but this doesn't really mean much. There is a quote where Stalin says that Hitler killing off unloyal millionaires doesn't make Nazi Germany socialist.
Also, the idea of socialism in China often is equivalent to social democratic welfarism of Scandinavia.
The party legitimizes itself by being connected to the Chinese Revolution and the Mao era, which despite all its catastrophes is seen as a positive event in Chinese history. The red paint makes a lot of people happy.
This is basically my position on it as well
Critical support for China against Western imperialism
Oppose China for its capitalist ways and foreign policy weakness
The party elite is basically using Singapore-style state capitalism to develop their country, which works better than neoliberalism of course. But it isn't socialism, so it has all the contradictions that capitalism usually has. For example, making the birth rate sink because you overwork the population.
State capitalism is preferable to neoliberalism, but it is inferior to socialism.
The party base has opportunists, careerists, but also "true believers" who hold on dearly to people like Mao and genuinely believe in socialism, albeit also believing that an extended era of capitalism is needed first.
The party elite has a hold on the bourgeoisie there by various means (such as finance being mostly nationalized), but this doesn't really mean much. There is a quote where Stalin says that Hitler killing off unloyal millionaires doesn't make Nazi Germany socialist.
Also, the idea of socialism in China often is equivalent to social democratic welfarism of Scandinavia.
The party legitimizes itself by being connected to the Chinese Revolution and the Mao era, which despite all its catastrophes is seen as a positive event in Chinese history. The red paint makes a lot of people happy.
I disagree with most of it except the last 2 paragraphs
Then feel free to share your views
Then feel free to share your views
I'm too lazy to write as much as you did so I'll keep it brief: I dont think it's state capitalist anymore its just capitalist, the party leadership has committed itself to Capitalism, is deeply intertwined with the bourgeoisie especially at the regional level, and whatever remaining true believers there are they have no influence. I'd ask what you mean by critical support for China against western imperialism before I give my view on that
I'm too lazy to write as much as you did so I'll keep it brief: I dont think it's state capitalist anymore its just capitalist, the party leadership has committed itself to Capitalism, is deeply intertwined with the bourgeoisie especially at the regional level, and whatever remaining true believers there are they have no influence. I'd ask what you mean by critical support for China against western imperialism before I give my view on that
I don't think what you say and what I say is in major contradiction
I remember back when i was studying law, our teacher asked if we vote based on our own individual interests or what we think is best for society as a whole
Of like 25 students, only me and one other guy chose what's best for society as a whole lol @cloud_rap @Nessy
Critical support for China against Western imperialism
Oppose China for its capitalist ways and foreign policy weakness
The party elite is basically using Singapore-style state capitalism to develop their country, which works better than neoliberalism of course. But it isn't socialism, so it has all the contradictions that capitalism usually has. For example, making the birth rate sink because you overwork the population.
State capitalism is preferable to neoliberalism, but it is inferior to socialism.
The party base has opportunists, careerists, but also "true believers" who hold on dearly to people like Mao and genuinely believe in socialism, albeit also believing that an extended era of capitalism is needed first.
The party elite has a hold on the bourgeoisie there by various means (such as finance being mostly nationalized), but this doesn't really mean much. There is a quote where Stalin says that Hitler killing off unloyal millionaires doesn't make Nazi Germany socialist.
Also, the idea of socialism in China often is equivalent to social democratic welfarism of Scandinavia.
The party legitimizes itself by being connected to the Chinese Revolution and the Mao era, which despite all its catastrophes is seen as a positive event in Chinese history. The red paint makes a lot of people happy.
i mean the thing is about state capitalism is that even moreso than standard neoliberalism it really only works when you agree with the state party. not that this isn't true with neoliberalism too, but it's definitely moreso with state capitalism.
The whole bit about people being young and later turning conservative is a tired talking point but there's some truth to it
When your politics revolves around what you perceive to further your own individual interest it's easy to be left-wing when you're young and worrying about student debt
But when you got a decent job, paid your loans off, own a house, maybe even another one you can rent out, do you still stand by your PRINCIPLES
Ngl it still kinda surprises me that so many people really just don't care about society and will readily admit it too, but then these are the same people doing social media activism lol
People are crayz man
I remember back when i was studying law, our teacher asked if we vote based on our own individual interests or what we think is best for society as a whole
Of like 25 students, only me and one other guy chose what's best for society as a whole lol @cloud_rap @Nessy
But wait till you touch a lil cheddar and this best for society as a whole s*** is over imo
The whole bit about people being young and later turning conservative is a tired talking point but there's some truth to it
When your politics revolves around what you perceive to further your own individual interest it's easy to be left-wing when you're young and worrying about student debt
But when you got a decent job, paid your loans off, own a house, maybe even another one you can rent out, do you still stand by your PRINCIPLES
Ngl it still kinda surprises me that so many people really just don't care about society and will readily admit it too, but then these are the same people doing social media activism lol
People are crayz man
so basically it applies to liberals
The whole bit about people being young and later turning conservative is a tired talking point but there's some truth to it
When your politics revolves around what you perceive to further your own individual interest it's easy to be left-wing when you're young and worrying about student debt
But when you got a decent job, paid your loans off, own a house, maybe even another one you can rent out, do you still stand by your PRINCIPLES
Ngl it still kinda surprises me that so many people really just don't care about society and will readily admit it too, but then these are the same people doing social media activism lol
People are crayz man
If you’re broke and a leftist you’re acting out of self interest
If you’re rich and a lefist you’re a hypocrite and a grifter
If you’re broke and a right winger you love your country
If you’re rich and a right winger you’re just looking out for your own people
The whole bit about people being young and later turning conservative is a tired talking point but there's some truth to it
When your politics revolves around what you perceive to further your own individual interest it's easy to be left-wing when you're young and worrying about student debt
But when you got a decent job, paid your loans off, own a house, maybe even another one you can rent out, do you still stand by your PRINCIPLES
Ngl it still kinda surprises me that so many people really just don't care about society and will readily admit it too, but then these are the same people doing social media activism lol
People are crayz man
I think it's more than that tbh. I think that's part of it but i think there's a social aspect. As a younger person you're more likely to have slightly rebellious social beliefs - not economically necessarily - but in the sense of thinking the social norms of the generation before you are flawed and gravitate toward the groups which attempt to progressively abolish or conflict with those groups older than you (for a multitude of reasons, I don't think it's not "trying to be hip and rebellious" superficially) - i also do htink those norms tend to always more aligned logically with leftist groups for obvious reasons (not always though which is how you end up with conservative/libertarian social activists i.e. andrew sullivan). However as you get older, you get more concretely settled because you aren't in touch with the younger generation and their own social trends, which then creates the same cyclical conflict.
I mean, as a good example of this, look at how many women didn't support civil rights, how many civil rights activists didn't support gay rights, but then how many like gay activists don't support trans stuff, etc.
But wait till you touch a lil cheddar and this best for society as a whole s*** is over imo
Yesterday after a work meeting my fellow student assistants started talking politricks and they're lefty libs
At some point i asked em what makes u voot for whom, they said what pursues my interests. I asked why and they said, may god forgive me for uttering this garbage, because it's important to have representation. And then i asked well what if u get money later on, u gonna voot for the neolibs?
Anything they said after this was just COPE
I think it's more than that tbh. I think that's part of it but i think there's a social aspect. As a younger person you're more likely to have slightly rebellious social beliefs - not economically necessarily - but in the sense of thinking the social norms of the generation before you are flawed and gravitate toward the groups which attempt to progressively abolish or conflict with those groups older than you (for a multitude of reasons, I don't think it's not "trying to be hip and rebellious" superficially) - i also do htink those norms tend to always more aligned logically with leftist groups for obvious reasons (not always though which is how you end up with conservative/libertarian social activists i.e. andrew sullivan). However as you get older, you get more concretely settled because you aren't in touch with the younger generation and their own social trends, which then creates the same cyclical conflict.
I mean, as a good example of this, look at how many women didn't support civil rights, how many civil rights activists didn't support gay rights, but then how many like gay activists don't support trans stuff, etc.
Also when you’re young you’re biologically more of a leftist cause you produce more of those things that make you accept novel ideas
Also when you’re young you’re biologically more of a leftist cause you produce more of those things that make you accept novel ideas
you're gonna have to explain to me what you mean here
Yesterday after a work meeting my fellow student assistants started talking politricks and they're lefty libs
At some point i asked em what makes u voot for whom, they said what pursues my interests. I asked why and they said, may god forgive me for uttering this garbage, because it's important to have representation. And then i asked well what if u get money later on, u gonna voot for the neolibs?
Anything they said after this was just COPE
Mfs trapped in the truman show of lacking self awareness
so basically it applies to liberals
Mostly yeah
Actually understanding why crapitalism is fricked and then becoming a capitalist later in life is much more rare
you're gonna have to explain to me what you mean here
When you’re young* lmao
Socdem is when your PRINCIPLES make you want change but your SELF INTEREST dont want toooo much change