Reply
  • Jun 9, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    plants

    Epictetus, a seminal figure in stoic philosophy, was literally a slave.

    Uncle Rukus too

  • plants 🌻
    Jun 9, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    stingray

    Uncle Rukus too

    Ahh I see you are a fool and a clown. Carry on.

  • Jun 9, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Smoofer

    Nah the real “brutal” truth is that sometimes you’re gonna have moments of fear, moments of laziness, moments of doubt, anxiety, whatever that you can’t do f*** all about. Trying to control those moments into something more productive (in the eyes of society) is gonna make you have a heart attack at age 40

    This is somewhat of a misunderstanding of Stoicism. Stoicism shares some commonalities with CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) and ERP (Exposure Response Prevention) which is sort of the opposite of what you're describing here. It's not about trying to 'control' your emotions, it's about understanding how to respond to them and therefore how to deal with them. The vicissitudes of life can't be outrun but one can learn to face them in way that they aren't focusing on the negative aspects.

  • Jun 9, 2020
    ·
    edited
    ·
    1 reply
    plants

    Ahh I see you are a fool and a clown. Carry on.

    Even if he was a slave, what wisdom is there to say that you must be complicit with the cosmos however it ordains you? They denied human beings any agency of change because nature flows and we flow with it. Friedrich Engels once said that Marcus Aurelius was the philosopher for the ruling class, and I couldn’t agree more. How do you explain poverty? Racism? Acts of war?

    Foucault was critical of stoicism because of this very emphasis on the personal. There’s no ‘personal’ in philosophy, because philosophy is supposed to overcome the soul, the personal, the thinking subject. Man is a thinking animal, but he also needs to get off his horses and see that he amounts to nothing and that nature is nothing but a projection of his imperfections.

  • Jun 9, 2020

    My main criticism of stoicism is whether or not there is some utility to be found in "needless" suffering that stoicism often claims to be the antidote to. Could there be an actual benefit or even a necessity to avoidable pain in the long run? How would you know if you didn't experience it in the first place?

  • plants 🌻
    Jun 9, 2020
    stingray

    Even if he was a slave, what wisdom is there to say that you must be complicit with the cosmos however it ordains you? They denied human beings any agency of change because nature flows and we flow with it. Friedrich Engels once said that Marcus Aurelius was the philosopher for the ruling class, and I couldn’t agree more. How do you explain poverty? Racism? Acts of war?

    Foucault was critical of stoicism because of this very emphasis on the personal. There’s no ‘personal’ in philosophy, because philosophy is supposed to overcome the soul, the personal, the thinking subject. Man is a thinking animal, but he also needs to get off his horses and see that he amounts to nothing and that nature is nothing but a projection of his imperfections.

    It's not about removing any agency you have and drifting like a leaf in the cosmic winds. It's about separating what you cannot change from what you can change and only working on the things you can change. You cannot change the circumstances of your birth. You cannot change the minds of others. But you can decide what and what not to act on, you can always be in control of your mind. It's about objective judgement, unselfish action, and willing acceptance of external factors that you cannot control. There is no use becoming upset if rain ruins your plans, simply move on and make new plants. There is no use in becoming angry when someone insults your character if you know it is false, you will show them the error of their ways with action.

    You've misconstrued the aspect of stoicism that says "don't try and control things you cannot control' to mean 'there is no use in doing anything ever".

  • Jun 9, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    plants

    P*** a hard one to break. For me it came down to changing my identity rather than my process or outcome. There are three layers of behavior change. The first is your outcomes, which is concerned with changing your results: losing weight, publishing a book, winning a championship.

    The second is changing your process. It deals with changing habits and systems: implementing a new routine at the gym, decluttering your desk for better workflow, developing a meditation practice.

    The third and deepest layer is changing your identity. Concerned with changing your beliefs: your worldview, your self-image, your judgments about yourself or others.

    So imagine two people resisting a cigarette. One says "no thanks I'm trying to quit" and the other says "no thanks I'm not a smoker". This is a small but powerful difference.

    For the last month I've been thinking about why it was so easy for me to go vegan at the flip of a switch and never go back, but so difficult for me to quit masturbating to p***. When I learned how unethical the factory farm industry was and how damaging it is to the environment it was a no brainer. I was suddenly a vegan and it meant a great deal to me. So why then was/am I struggling so hard to quit p*** when I know that the industry is just as unethical?

    It's because I hadn't yet changed my identity, and I'm still in that process. But I've been telling myself that I am not a person who watches p*** for the past week and it's really been helping. I also have systems in place for when I feel the urge and I have unsaved/unsubscribed from dozens of subreddits.

    Wow this is a game changer

  • plants 🌻
    Jun 9, 2020
    ragedsycokiller

    Wow this is a game changer

    Thanks I hope it helps. Most of this info comes from a book called Atomic Habits which I can really recommend.

  • Jun 9, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    Oh wait I've read about this in intro philosophy before. Isn't this what someone did in prison in order to get through a war? They let the universe take course and he just flicks it off his shoulder on bettering himself mentally?

  • plants 🌻
    Jun 9, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    ragedsycokiller

    Oh wait I've read about this in intro philosophy before. Isn't this what someone did in prison in order to get through a war? They let the universe take course and he just flicks it off his shoulder on bettering himself mentally?

    Might be thinking of Viktor Frankl?

  • Jun 9, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    plants

    Might be thinking of Viktor Frankl?

    Might be, most of that class is locked away since it cause a nasty extostential dread compounded with the stress of graduating with not knowing what I want to do

  • plants 🌻
    Jun 9, 2020
    ragedsycokiller

    Might be, most of that class is locked away since it cause a nasty extostential dread compounded with the stress of graduating with not knowing what I want to do

    Gotcha, he was an Austrian neurologist and psychiatrist as well as a Holocaust survivor and wrote extensively about his experiences during the war.

  • Jun 9, 2020
    Very Based

    This is somewhat of a misunderstanding of Stoicism. Stoicism shares some commonalities with CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) and ERP (Exposure Response Prevention) which is sort of the opposite of what you're describing here. It's not about trying to 'control' your emotions, it's about understanding how to respond to them and therefore how to deal with them. The vicissitudes of life can't be outrun but one can learn to face them in way that they aren't focusing on the negative aspects.

    Yeah, I wasn’t getting that viewpoint from the other poster

  • Jun 9, 2020
    plants

    The Discourses/Fragments/Enchiridion from Epictetus are excellent. I try and ready the Enchiridion every month as a reminder.

    I have to re read it again myself

    He covers so much about life in general

  • Stoic people get p****

  • Jun 9, 2020
    stingray

    Marcus Aurelius said all that s*** cause he’s an emperor. It’s all fun and game until you apply it to disadvantaged people. Imagine telling a poor person that their poverty is outside of their control and that they could nothing to change it, except going with the flow.

    F*** the stoics. It’s all about Diogenes and Epicurus

    Seneca actually agreed with Epicurus on a few things

    You can learn from your enemy

    And it is outside their control and what they CAN do to START a change is fortify their way of thinking and make steps to getting out of poverty.

    At the end of the day you do what you can and life is going to take it's course.

    You could apply the same a***ogy to a wealthy person going bankrupt somehow due to circumstances they can't help.

  • Jun 9, 2020
    ·
    1 reply

    is this something an already super nonchalant, “shit happens” type of person should look into 👀

    like to the point where it’s almost toxic

  • plants 🌻
    Jun 9, 2020
    shad

    is this something an already super nonchalant, “shit happens” type of person should look into 👀

    like to the point where it’s almost toxic

    I think anyone can benefit from these teachings.

  • Jun 28, 2020

    in

  • Jun 28, 2020
    ·
    2 replies
    plants

    Big bump.

    Smoofer lost in the leftist sauce. Stoic philisophy is about feeling your emotions, recognizing how they make you feel, and moving forward in a logical way to continue on your personal path towards greatness.

    Sooo basically self control?

  • Jun 28, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    CRACKASTEPPAVEGAN

    Sooo basically self control?

    acceptance.

  • MARIA IM DRUNK

    acceptance.

    I mean if it's something you can't change, better to change your perception of it.

  • Jun 28, 2020

    Not a fan

  • Jun 28, 2020
    ·
    2 replies

    "Stoicism doesn’t concern itself with complicated theories about the world, but with helping us overcome destructive emotions and act on what can be acted upon. It’s built for action, not endless debate."

    So just accept the world as it is and don't question anything? I'm not with that.

  • Jun 28, 2020
    ·
    1 reply
    Scratchin Mamba

    "Stoicism doesn’t concern itself with complicated theories about the world, but with helping us overcome destructive emotions and act on what can be acted upon. It’s built for action, not endless debate."

    So just accept the world as it is and don't question anything? I'm not with that.

    the common good is one of the main principles of stoicism