you were complaining about being fat and working at walmart, you should be on our side so you can fight for more fulfilling work and better nutrition
you were complaining about being fat and working at walmart, you should be on our side so you can fight for more fulfilling work and better nutrition
you couldn't... lots of people could.
Deadass you must operating with like 55 brain cells total.
I can think of a few ways to get them out.
And idk maybe you couple the abolition of private property with the targeted construction of socialized housing for the homeless?
I'm not saying you could not still afford a house.
I'm saying that doesn't change the ability for an individual to afford to own property.
And If no one owned property everyone would be homeless, renters and home owners.
I definitely think their should be socialized housing for homeless, and that people with more properties should be taxed more and that the money should go towards social causes such as socialized housing.
But I just genuinely do not think it would be advantageous to attempt to eradicate privatize home ownership in the US.
And as you said you're a college grad who can afford a house, so you yourself would be fine and with the added security you earned for yourself.
They produce nothing of value and give nothing to society? How about apartments and homes?
The property of landlords must be removed from their possession by the people? Okay so get together and buy it from them. Then you can be the landlord.
they don't build the house LOL
Deadass you must operating with like 55 brain cells total.
i dont know why yall care if people are renting out there homes. houses arnt free it costs money to build houses
I'm not saying you could not still afford a house.
I'm saying that doesn't change the ability for an individual to afford to own property.
And If no one owned property everyone would be homeless, renters and home owners.
I definitely think their should be socialized housing for homeless, and that people with more properties should be taxed more and that the money should go towards social causes such as socialized housing.
But I just genuinely do not think it would be advantageous to attempt to eradicate privatize home ownership in the US.
And as you said you're a college grad who can afford a house, so you yourself would be fine and with the added security you earned for yourself.
Personal property =/= private property, maybe look into it.
i dont know why yall care if people are renting out there homes. houses arnt free it costs money to build houses
landlords don't build houses.
they don't build the house LOL
they pay for the houses 💀💀 yall r missing that part
anyways, i genuinely think you have no clue what you're talking about. You just think landlords are good. You're wrong, hopefully one day you realize it.
they pay for the houses 💀💀 yall r missing that part
to be fair the government could pay for houses to be build
to be fair the government could pay for houses to be build
thats not what they are saying tho.
lets say you're renting a house
if suddenly your landlord disappeared off the face of the earth
the house does not go away.
the landlord did not supply you with housing. he simply decided to charge you for shelter.
anyways, i genuinely think you have no clue what you're talking about. You just think landlords are good. You're wrong, hopefully one day you realize it.
Obviously there’s bad landlords out there but to act like they’re all evil is stupid
I get the hate for billionaires but hating all landlords and saying “armed force” should be taken on them is dumb as f***
lets say you're renting a house
if suddenly your landlord disappeared off the face of the earth
the house does not go away.
the landlord did not supply you with housing. he simply decided to charge you for shelter.
he owns the house...
Obviously there’s bad landlords out there but to act like they’re all evil is stupid
I get the hate for billionaires but hating all landlords and saying “armed force” should be taken on them is dumb as f***
It is actually not dumb as f***. The nature of the landlord is exploitative. It doesn't matter if they do it with a smile or not.
he owns the house...
You seem to be missing the part about where he should not be able to own the house.
You seem to be missing the part about where he should not be able to own the house.
so he shouldn't be able to buy it and rent it?
so he shouldn't be able to buy it and rent it?
Wow you're starting to get it.
Why are the landlords not supplying the 500k homeless people with houses
why dont u?