why dont u?
idk I'm not a landlord. They supply the housing according to y'all
lets say you're renting a house
if suddenly your landlord disappeared off the face of the earth
the house does not go away.
the landlord did not supply you with housing. he simply decided to charge you for shelter.
There is a stark difference between a house and shelter, you can live in a cave or in the woods and your argument has basically been that a house (with electric, utility, water etc.) is the same. Just because the landlord disappears. There is intrinsic value in the house, it's not just a shelter
Food and water and shelter should be free
why should people have to profit off basic human needs. what justification is there to say "but it will make me money!"
why dont u?
because we are not a******s who buy up homes in order to steal from the working class
such as?
well off the top of my head, if a car dealer were to supply you with a vehicle that ur paying monthly payments on, if the dealer were to just disappeared wouldn't the car still be there
wouldn't this go for a lot things on earth tho
only if you take his point in the most literal sense.
like sure the apple i bought doesnt disappear even if the farmer who made it does, but all of the future apples will. that farmer is necessary for the production of something with a lot of use value to me.
same doesnt hold true for a guy whos only involvement is having a claim to the house
Wow you're starting to get it.
so ur against rent? u would be fine if someone paid to have 50 houses built and sold them but not rent them?
Just a daily reminder that every communist state has failed and gemocided its own ppl.
There is a stark difference between a house and shelter, you can live in a cave or in the woods and your argument has basically been that a house (with electric, utility, water etc.) is the same. Just because the landlord disappears. There is intrinsic value in the house, it's not just a shelter
A house's primary function is as a shelter. It has other functions.
Just a daily reminder that every communist state has failed and gemocided its own ppl.
user to post
There is a stark difference between a house and shelter, you can live in a cave or in the woods and your argument has basically been that a house (with electric, utility, water etc.) is the same. Just because the landlord disappears. There is intrinsic value in the house, it's not just a shelter
a cave 💀💀
Just a daily reminder that every communist state has failed and gemocided its own ppl.
also every capitalist state has been more genocidal
so ur against rent? u would be fine if someone paid to have 50 houses built and sold them but not rent them?
I'm against rent, and no, that would not be fine.
Why are the landlords not supplying the 500k homeless people with houses
Even if all the landlords gave up their extra houses, there still would be homeless people
Getting rid of landlords doesn’t solve homelessness
also every capitalist state has been more genocidal
Idk why you lefties are against capitalism, would much rather have that than communism lmao
Even if all the landlords gave up their extra houses, there still would be homeless people
Getting rid of landlords doesn’t solve homelessness
Oh s*** its almost as if landlords don't supply housing
A house's primary function is as a shelter. It has other functions.
What do you consider as shelter? A place to sleep at night? because the ditch in my neighbourhood can be considered a shelter
Idk why you lefties are against capitalism, would much rather have that than communism lmao
see my first reply to you, you'd be much better off under a different system