facts of the case
kelsey and meg fought
shots were fired
tory and his security guard punched kelsey and threw her back into the car after the shots were heard
kelsey is the only person who had GSR on her
Yeah possible, but u do see how this blurs the case and makes it not as clear cut as people think ?
Oh absolutely
The case initially went off the rails because she vehemently said âYOU SHOT ME NIGGAâ
years later, we now know that at least one doctor examined you and didnât come away with you being shot, and the docs who did the surgery on the bullet fragments didnât mention anything about her actually being âshotâ a ton of gray and ambiguity
Thereâs no doubt a gun was fired in her direction but a gun going off multiple times, her being shot but having no injuries to any bones or tendons, twerking a few days later, leaves a ton of room for interpretation
facts of the case
kelsey and meg fought
shots were fired
tory and his security guard punched kelsey and threw her back into the car after the shots were heard
kelsey is the only person who had GSR on her
Wait what
She did???
Wait what
She did???
she tested for GSR on her hands
torys results came back inconclusive
she tested for GSR on her hands
torys results came back inconclusive
I didnât know this. Damn.
she tested for GSR on her hands
torys results came back inconclusive
What does inconclusive mean?
What does inconclusive mean?
it means there was an undetectable amount on him when they arrested him
which is favorable for him
facts of the case
kelsey and meg fought
shots were fired
tory and his security guard punched kelsey and threw her back into the car after the shots were heard
kelsey is the only person who had GSR on her
Wouldnât someone be treated for physical wounds if they were beat?
That same report states everyone except Meg did not complain of pains or injuries during the event, and Iâm sure something wouldâve been said or physically proven by now.
Even then, these witness reports all confirm what Meg denies which was an altercation with her friend took place.
it means there was an undetectable amount on him when they arrested him
which is favorable for him
But it does not mean that he did not shoot, which is what you are trying to say.
Wouldnât someone be treated for physical wounds if they were beat?
That same report states everyone except Meg did not complain of pains or injuries during the event, and Iâm sure something wouldâve been said or physically proven by now.
Even then, these witness reports all confirm what Meg denies which was an altercation with her friend took place.
if what the witness said is true they might not have been mollywhoppin her or anything
plus everybody was pretty noncompliant after getting pulled over to begin with so idk
if what the witness said is true they might not have been mollywhoppin her or anything
plus everybody was pretty noncompliant after getting pulled over to begin with so idk
True. Close-fist being described is wild as f***.
The issue is that like with everything, thereâs a ton of gray area
-itâs pretty clear that she was at least âshot atâ and those bullet fragments being dislodged from her foot suggest at least that much. She also kicked through the window of the car, which is where IMO the glass laceration comes from
She was in a fight with her homegirl, who lawyered quick whichâŠnvm
Thereâs no DNA from Tory or gun residue on his person or clothing in large part because the time she lost from initially lying about what happened
If I was a betting man, Iâd bet that drunk ass Tory (or her friend tbh which makes more sense to be) pulled the trigger but not in a malicious way, didnât expect for the bullets to partially graze her, and that it was understood by all parties involved that it was an accident, hence the gray area that I mentioned earlier.
He will probably get off because without DNA, and because she initially lied, that will be enough to suggest that you canât prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he in fact shot her
There was no evidence of bullet fragments in her foot.
But it does not mean that he did not shoot, which is what you are trying to say.
never said he didnt shoot at all although reading what im reading its not an insane stance to takeâŠ
ive been trying to be impartial but 2 + 2 gotta equal 4 at some point
Do people realise that Meg was definitely shot at? The way they talk like she just made this all up out of thin air.
It's a black woman so we know why that is though.
Where's the evidence that she was shot at?
But it does not mean that he did not shoot, which is what you are trying to say.
It kinda does lol
No it doesn't lol
It does. If he fired the gun he wouldâve had gsr on him lol.
âInconclusiveâ is legal jargon for âhe didnât have gsr on himâ.
But it does not mean that he did not shoot, which is what you are trying to say.
So now it's up to him to prove he didn't shoot her rather than them trying to prove he did shoot her??
It does. If he fired the gun he wouldâve had gsr on him lol.
âInconclusiveâ is legal jargon for âhe didnât have gsr on himâ.
Nigga you know damn well that's not true. The legal jargon for that is "eliminated"
So now it's up to him to prove he didn't shoot her rather than them trying to prove he did shoot her??
What the f***
They are about to have a trial, what do you think the state is going to try to prove?
Some of you guys are f***ing stupid lmao
What do you think a trial is? Your team trying to prove your innocence vs them trying to prove your guilty.