Yeah, no. What the hell. A rape victim should not be forced to give birth. They had no intention of getting pregnant in the first place because they were RAPED. Imagine getting raped, then get forced to go through childbirth because of what someone else did to you, and then after every pro life nutcase got their wish you get left alone having to care for a child that will remind you of that rape, and might resemble your rapist for the next 18 years of your life. Yes it's not the childs fault, it didn't ask to be born. But it wasn't the mothers choice to give birth either.

You pro lifers don't even give a s*** about what happens to babies once they're born. An unwanted child will not be raised in the loving environment with the stability it needs. And there's already way too many children waiting to be adopted. If anything yall are only exacerbating an already existing problem.

And you're not even considering how traumatic putting a child up for adoption even is for many women. Carrying a child for 9 months, giving birth to it, seeing it and then having to part ways with it, knowing that's your child that you'll probably never see again is an experience that can really haunt women for the rest of their lives. So don't say "you can always consider adoption".

Not to mention pregnancy, and giving birth comes with many risks for women. Infection, diabetes, anemia, trombosis, depression, the list goes on. There's still a large number of women that die due to giving birth.

Women will always draw the short end of the stick because not only do they gotta give birth, they're also almost always the primary care givers for these children. The responsibility for that life rarely falls on the man that helped creating it, so at least give women the choice on wether or not they even want to put themselves up for that.

stay a thing, i dont want no ed baby

It's the womans body. It's her choice. The premise of pro-choice arguments is based on the right to privacy regarding personal anatomy. Not everything is clear cut, but the "right to privacy" usually grants an individual freedom of choice to make decisions based on their own personal preferences or beliefs, rather than the overall moral consensus of society.

Therefore, whether or not a fetus is considered human is irrelevant to the abortion discussion. A considerable amount of medical rights in the U.S. operate on the same principle of bodily autonomy as pro-choice arguments. These laws usually give the individual with right to privacy, the upperhand over anything else, including other human beings. That's one reason why arguments against abortion have failed consistently, because they violate this basic principle.

That being said, there are several common scenarios that demonstrate the same right to privacy abortion laws are based on. One being organ donation.

No human being in the USA is required to donate their personal organs to another person. You have the authority to exercise bodily autonomy by denying donations, even at the expense of another life. That is because, in some cases, individual rights triumph others' rights. The sentiment being, everyone has the right to life, but no one is entitled to use another's body without their consent.

Let's say you have an adult child. There is no debate that this is a living breathing, full-blown human being. He/She is extremely sick and needs you to donate your organs, blood, etc in order to survive. Because it is your medical right to decide what happens to your body, you are not legally obligated to donate anything, even if it will save your child's life. The individual right to bodily autonomy supersedes the person in need.

Even dead people are given these same privileges. Although it may save hundreds of lives, we do not allow medical centers to use people's bodies to "experiment" or donate organs without that person's consent. The fact that the person in question is deceased and using those organs may help another human being live, is irrelevant due to the personal liberties.

"The United States' system for organ procurement operates under a model of expressed consent. This means that an individual will not be an organ donor unless he or she explicitly states otherwise."

journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/presumed-vs-expressed-consent-us-and-internationally/2005-09

No, donating organs to someone in need is not the same as quote on quote "murdering a child" or "murdering a fetus." However, as stated earlier, it is an example of the same sentiment expressed in pro-choice arguments. In the case of abortion, it is the woman's body being used by something else. For that reason the woman has the upperhand and is another reason why both many pro-choice and pro-life advocates agree that if a woman's life is in danger, she has the right to an abortion.

Underrated Wayne song.

As a man I have no opinion on actual abortion because it's not my decision, it's not my body to have an opinion on it. It's a woman's personal choice.

Depends if you're not financially situated or too young, or there is rape.

Necessary

As a man, i dont have a the best understanding on it, but i will say if its from the cases of rape, or the mother is not financially stable to raise a child than it should be considered

if u aint a woman u really aint got a say in the matter

Mans I replied too posts really got Thanos snapped lol

better to kill em before they have to live through 70-90 years of the almost unbearable pain of existing

I am very strongly pro-life, with the three exceptions - rape, incest and protecting the life of the mother - the same position taken by Ronald Reagan.

I don’t have an opinion, it’s not my body, so it’s not my place. I can feel a way, but in the end it doesn’t matter.

not my business or my concern unless its my fault then if it is abort that baby bruh

Putting restrictions on abortions whilst keeping them legal makes troubles worse for women in lower socioeconomic classes and those living in rural areas.

Do humans have the rights to choose who lives or dies?

Think it just depends on how you answer that question

Besides rape is the only argument for abortion convenience?

Keep abortions legal so women don’t have to have unsafe abortions #prochoice

Why would you unironically endorse Reagan's beliefs as an alleged African-American?
Did that MAGA that hat fry your brains

Should the government have the right to force a woman to keep an unwanted pregnancy or not, is a much better question. The foetus's death is ultimately an inconvenience of abortion, not the end goal.

F*** em

It’s ultimately her choice, and advice from her parents maybe the guys parents but other than that no weirdo strangers choices/views that’s not from that family does. not. matter.