TRUE. THE TRANSATLANTIC SLAVE TRADE WAS ALSO A GENOCIDE. MOST SLAVES DIDN'T EVEN MAKE IT TO AMERICAN LANDS.
Of course. We like to highlight slavery but what happened to the native Americans was even worse. Not that it’s something worth comparing.
America killed an insane amount of native Americans
Take the indian subcontinent for example
The place was always the wealthiest or second wealthiest place in the world under the muslims before the UK conspired with the hindoos to transform it into a broke ass country
Sounds like the Muslims weren’t innocent either
The colonial doctrine is to exploit preexistent sectarian violence to gain control
Of course. We like to highlight slavery but what happened to the native Americans was even worse. Not that it’s something worth comparing.
America killed an insane amount of native Americans
IM NOT COMPARING. REST IN PEACE TO ALL THEM. F*** AMERIKKKA
Of course. We like to highlight slavery but what happened to the native Americans was even worse. Not that it’s something worth comparing.
America killed an insane amount of native Americans
Not that it’s worth comparing but I’m going to open this post with comparing them
Estimates for the amount of native Americans killed by colonial powers range from 80-120 million
Estimates for the amount of native Americans killed by colonial powers range from 80-120 million
THE WORLD'S FIRST CIVILIZATIONS ALL STARTED AT THE SAME TIME.
YELLOW RIVER IN CHINA
GANGES RIVER IN INDIA
MESOPOTAMIA
THE ANDEAN MOUNTAINS
AND THE VALLEYS OF MEXICO.
IF COLONIALISM HADN'T HAPPENED, WHAT IS NOW CALLED MEXICO WOULD PROBABLY HAD A BILLION PEOPLE BY NOW. THEIR POPULATION WAS VERY HIGH
Of course. We like to highlight slavery but what happened to the native Americans was even worse. Not that it’s something worth comparing.
America killed an insane amount of native Americans
Disease killed most natives.
also ridiculous for people itt to act like certain groups were these primitive people that couldn't distinguish right from wrong lol
Disease killed most natives.
It was still a genocide. If 110M died from disease and the vast majority of the remaining 6M were killed by the US, it’s still a genocide. Denying it is flat out wrong.
It was still a genocide. If 110M died from disease and the vast majority of the remaining 6M were killed by the US, it’s still a genocide. Denying it is flat out wrong.
The remaining 6 million weren't killed by the US. You do know that right?
Sounds like the Muslims weren’t innocent either
The colonial doctrine is to exploit preexistent sectarian violence to gain control
Muslims ruled for centuries and made the place the most or second most wealthiest region at all times
Envy took over the hindoos who thought they could just do the same by themselves and they decided to side with the anglos. Turns out they couldnt, they got slaved by them before entering crippling poverty as a free people 🤷🏽♂️
Now its not sure the place will ever get back to its former glory, its sad really
Muslims ruled for centuries and made the place the most or second most wealthiest region at all times
Envy took over the hindoos who thought they could just do the same by themselves and they decided to side with the anglos. Turns out they couldnt, they got slaved by them before entering crippling poverty as a free people 🤷🏽♂️
Now its not sure the place will ever get back to its former glory, its sad really
You think the Muslim minority really ruled without any sort of reliance on the subjugation or cooperation of Hindus?
Romans were going down anyways
Info on the last bit??
Look up the origins of syphilis
Don’t quote me exactly but It had to do with the Norman’s going to war in Italy at some point in the Middle Ages and spending too much time on the brothels there and the first recorded cases happened there
You think the Muslim minority really ruled without any sort of reliance on the subjugation or cooperation of Hindus?
I mean sure they relied on them as subjects to a certain extent but there was always a clear hierarchy and a muslim directed system that made the place what it was
They thought they could cut it without muslims and they got slaved instead 🤷🏽♂️
I mean, this is a broad historical question to ask because in what time period do you mean?
Blame the romans and khan dynasty-era mongols for everything tbh
Muslims ruled for centuries and made the place the most or second most wealthiest region at all times
Envy took over the hindoos who thought they could just do the same by themselves and they decided to side with the anglos. Turns out they couldnt, they got slaved by them before entering crippling poverty as a free people 🤷🏽♂️
Now its not sure the place will ever get back to its former glory, its sad really
you sound like a nationalist dawg