i feel like you’re missing the point of what i said but cool
How is it profiting off their own labor if 99% of their profit comes from corporations existing which apparently are “exploitative”
How is it profiting off their own labor if 99% of their profit comes from corporations existing which apparently are “exploitative”
i said generally that is the concept as to why
i didn’t say that’s what actually plays out in practice
again, i feel like you don’t understand the core concept
You do realize that wealthy entertainers generate a majority off their wealth via corporations to some extent, whether it’s endorsements, partnerships, distribution, etc…… right?
the wealthiest who have crayz branding like MJ or Bron yea for sure but the avg nba player for example absolutely not unless, at least not during their career
Exploiting workers is when you agree to work for a certain wage and can leave whenever you please
You do realize that wealthy entertainers generate a majority off their wealth via corporations to some extent, whether it’s endorsements, partnerships, distribution, etc…… right?
Getting a company to pay you 10m is a little different than exploiting 10k people with low wages who work in your factory
the wealthiest who have crayz branding like MJ or Bron yea for sure but the avg nba player for example absolutely not unless, at least not during their career
Where do you think NBA teams get the capability to pay some scrub on the bench $12 million a year genius?
Getting a company to pay you 10m is a little different than exploiting 10k people with low wages who work in your factory
Where does the company get the $10m
Where does the company get the $10m
Lord knows but that's not on the person on the receiving end is it
Exploiting workers is when you agree to work for a certain wage and can leave whenever you please
then why are you talking about exploitation at all, bc all economic transactions have at least this minimal amount of room for choice
then why are you talking about exploitation at all, bc all economic transactions have at least this minimal amount of room for choice
I was being sarcastic saying this whole argument y’all have is f***ing stupid
Where do you think NBA teams get the capability to pay some scrub on the bench $12 million a year genius?
all companies get the capability to pay any employees through exploitation lmao that's literally just how companies work
Lord knows but that's not on the person on the receiving end is it
Uhh yes it is lol - it’s all apart of the same system so why are we picking and choosing who is good and who is bad based on who interests us more? Seems like an awful way to make your point
I was being sarcastic saying this whole argument y’all have is f***ing stupid
before u call an argument stupid u should at least understand it, which u dont
all companies get the capability to pay any employees through exploitation lmao that's literally just how companies work
So what was your point…… all NBA players salaries are paid by partnerships and TV deals with the teams which then go to the players. It is no different than a player directly partnering with the source of cash at all
So what was your point…… all NBA players salaries are paid by partnerships and TV deals with the teams which then go to the players. It is no different than a player directly partnering with the source of cash at all
no its not because literallly every worker's salary comes from the surplus value which capitalists obtained thru exploitation
no its not because literallly every worker's salary comes from the surplus value which capitalists obtained thru exploitation
How can you exploit somebody who has no obligation to you
How can you exploit somebody who has no obligation to you
exploitation =/= coercion
the action or fact of treating someone unfairly in order to benefit from their work.
then leave?