I was referring to the manuscript of the Quran, it’s literally scholarly consensus that the Bible is a compilation of annotated oral stories that were compiled 700+ years after the deaths of the last remaining apostles followers
Even a cardinal wouldn’t debate this lmfao
you're not saying anything relating to the initial discrepancy that i have with you
you are saying that the Bible is not original and that it has changed millions of times, i am requesting you to link me a source, that says this
you saying "the bible is a compilation of annotated oral stories that were compiled 700+ years" (and mind you, lots of religions are exactly like this, so i don't even know why you're levying this issue with just Christianity in particular, pretty shallow and disingenuous argument) is literally not moving this conversation anywhere
if you're just an islamic dogmatist you can just say that and we can move on
you're not saying anything relating to the initial discrepancy that i have with you
you are saying that the Bible is not original and that it has changed millions of times, i am requesting you to link me a source, that says this
you saying "the bible is a compilation of annotated oral stories that were compiled 700+ years" (and mind you, lots of religions are exactly like this, so i don't even know why you're levying this issue with just Christianity in particular, pretty shallow and disingenuous argument) is literally not moving this conversation anywhere
if you're just an islamic dogmatist you can just say that and we can move on
There are multiple errors in the bible
And didnt they find old bibles that prove its been changed?
The Bible is a random assortment of stories pretty much untraceable in origin. (Bible meaning the present day order and presentation in form of Christianity’s scriptures).
It’s been altered, change, and in unison has never been codified and kept the same from beginning to end
Copies from the Quran from the 8th century have been DNA tested and the book has been confirmed by experts to have been exactly the same since it’s inception to the present
Just on that surface level, islam has a higher merit
Untrue
Another aspect to consider is that Christians can't even agree what "the Bible" is since different denominations include different books in their canon
There are multiple errors in the bible
And didnt they find old bibles that prove its been changed?
im well aware, that's completely different from saying the Bible is somehow not the original word of God though, errors are liable when something is constantly translated and spread
he's acting like someone came along took some manuscripts out and made some s*** up and put it in the Bible and passed it off as the word of God, this flies in the face of a s*** ton of actual theologians, historians and archaeologists - he would've been better off talking about the possible books that were lost or didn't even make the Bible period, not questioning the historical veracity of it of all things
im well aware, that's completely different from saying the Bible is somehow not the original word of God though, errors are liable when something is constantly translated and spread
he's acting like someone came along took some manuscripts out and made some s*** up and put it in the Bible and passed it off as the word of God, this flies in the face of a s*** ton of actual theologians, historians and archaeologists - he would've been better off talking about the possible books that were lost or didn't even make the Bible period, not questioning the historical veracity of it of all things
Always heard people say when church was formed they took multiple things that looked bad out from the bible but might be conspiracy
The Bible is a random assortment of stories pretty much untraceable in origin. (Bible meaning the present day order and presentation in form of Christianity’s scriptures).
It’s been altered, change, and in unison has never been codified and kept the same from beginning to end
Copies from the Quran from the 8th century have been DNA tested and the book has been confirmed by experts to have been exactly the same since it’s inception to the present
Just on that surface level, islam has a higher merit
The gospels of the New Testament are written in historical narrative literary style and was written at the very latest between 70-90 AD, maybe earlier but that is when Roman leaders wrote letters quoting the gospels. The Quran and the Bible make truth claims about Jesus. The Quran was written 600 years after Jesus, why should someone believe the Quran truth claims of Jesus over a source written during the same century Jesus lived
you're not saying anything relating to the initial discrepancy that i have with you
you are saying that the Bible is not original and that it has changed millions of times, i am requesting you to link me a source, that says this
you saying "the bible is a compilation of annotated oral stories that were compiled 700+ years" (and mind you, lots of religions are exactly like this, so i don't even know why you're levying this issue with just Christianity in particular, pretty shallow and disingenuous argument) is literally not moving this conversation anywhere
if you're just an islamic dogmatist you can just say that and we can move on
I need to give a historical context in summary with a scholarly literature to explain to you that a bunch of short stories that were mostly taught orally have been altered in context and sequence and form of complications?
This is before even getting into the issue of translation from language to language especially when we’re talking about Aramaic which has no direct translations to many of the major languages in which the Bible was disseminated. We’re talking about the Bible modern form, and it’s very clearly obvious that a document compiled in its complete form, 700+ years after the death of the last primary sources of those stories, is problematic.
Look at ancient manuscripts of Assyrian Orthodox Church versus Ethiopian versus Eastern Catholic versus Greek. Through translation after translation there’s been significant differences between different orthodox versions.
The entire original point of my post is a draw contrast between the main primary source to holy book pathways of Islam versus Christianity, where Islam is clearly a more sound system of faith when basing it on the validity of its holy book. There are clear forms of evidence showing the dictation of the Quran from the prophet directly to multiple annotators and scribes — this does not exist in Christianity.
dude literally just made that s*** up out of thin f***ing air
No idea where he got that from but that is a common thought for alot of ppl
I need to give a historical context in summary with a scholarly literature to explain to you that a bunch of short stories that were mostly taught orally have been altered in context and sequence and form of complications?
This is before even getting into the issue of translation from language to language especially when we’re talking about Aramaic which has no direct translations to many of the major languages in which the Bible was disseminated. We’re talking about the Bible modern form, and it’s very clearly obvious that a document compiled in its complete form, 700+ years after the death of the last primary sources of those stories, is problematic.
Look at ancient manuscripts of Assyrian Orthodox Church versus Ethiopian versus Eastern Catholic versus Greek. Through translation after translation there’s been significant differences between different orthodox versions.
The entire original point of my post is a draw contrast between the main primary source to holy book pathways of Islam versus Christianity, where Islam is clearly a more sound system of faith when basing it on the validity of its holy book. There are clear forms of evidence showing the dictation of the Quran from the prophet directly to multiple annotators and scribes — this does not exist in Christianity.
Islam is the truest form of Christianity
The gospels of the New Testament are written in historical narrative literary style and was written at the very latest between 70-90 AD, maybe earlier but that is when Roman leaders wrote letters quoting the gospels. The Quran and the Bible make truth claims about Jesus. The Quran was written 600 years after Jesus, why should someone believe the Quran truth claims of Jesus over a source written during the same century Jesus lived
Why would you believe a book of story compilations that didn’t exist in its current form until hundreds and hundreds of years after the death of the followers of the apostles and not even the apostles them selves
That’s the point, what you’re talking about is snippets of the gospels and not the book in its complete form which is what I’m referring to
Another aspect to consider is that Christians can't even agree what "the Bible" is since different denominations include different books in their canon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_canon
Another aspect to consider and is lmfao funny is how Quran got them verses to help Muhammad finesse his way outta s***
Surah At-Tahrim 66
O Prophet, why do you prohibit yourself from what Allah has made lawful for you, seeking the approval of your wives? And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
--
According to Tabari and sahih Bukhari Habsa (Muhammad's wife) catches Muhammad with the slave girl Mariya Al Qibtiya and tells Ayesha. S*** gets crazy and the almighty sends down these verse from the heavens to get the wives to stfu.
Neither of them are real if you want the real answer and it should be obvious to anyone
Believe in it if you want but the fact that there have been hundreds of religion throughout time should say enough
Another aspect to consider and is lmfao funny is how Quran got them verses to help Muhammad finesse his way outta s***
Surah At-Tahrim 66
O Prophet, why do you prohibit yourself from what Allah has made lawful for you, seeking the approval of your wives? And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
--
According to Tabari and sahih Bukhari Habsa (Muhammad's wife) catches Muhammad with the slave girl Mariya Al Qibtiya and tells Ayesha. S*** gets crazy and the almighty sends down these verse from the heavens to get the wives to stfu.
And you still have this this potato posting alt right tier low effort s*** posts that are islamophobic and misinformation
Neither of them are real if you want the real answer and it should be obvious to anyone
Believe in it if you want but the fact that there have been hundreds of religion throughout time should say enough
How are they not real when we still discovering stuff thats been in the Quran for thousands of years
Neither of them are real if you want the real answer and it should be obvious to anyone
Believe in it if you want but the fact that there have been hundreds of religion throughout time should say enough
Careful now you're gonna be called a fedora wearing, unhygienic, fat white boy itt for this
Careful now you're gonna be called a fedora wearing, unhygienic, fat white boy itt for this
White boy that doesnt wash his ass for sure
And you still have this this potato posting alt right tier low effort s*** posts that are islamophobic and misinformation
It's in the history books my G
You guys yourself say to look at the events of the time and read interpretations lol
Careful now you're gonna be called a fedora wearing, unhygienic, fat white boy itt for this
Lmfao i was literally raised muslim and have been to mosques my entire life with imams spouting the most disgusting s*** you'll ever hear
I was there last week when I was with my parents and they were going on a crazy homophobic rant