Some of the more smaller, usually cynical reviewers i follow have been like “yk what this is pretty good and Ariana Grande deserves an oscar”
Some of the more smaller, usually cynical reviewers i follow have been like “yk what this is pretty good and Ariana Grande deserves an oscar”
I know who you are talking about exactly lool
Is this still being split into two parts?
Some of the more smaller, usually cynical reviewers i follow have been like “yk what this is pretty good and Ariana Grande deserves an oscar”
More cynical than critical grifter?
You just seen part 1 crodie wym
Good to know. Not watching this bullshit then. F*** these people
F*** i hve to go see gladiator tnight but smething is telling me to just go see this again
Unfortunately, it is one of the best films of the year
Bro depressed he saw a good movie..
People get angry when movies are two parts?
I don't get it.
I love a good cliffhanger, and it makes sense to do it for a musical that has an actual intermission baked into it.
There's examples where it's been done poorly, but it's not automatically bad as some sort of rule.
??
They did the entire story in a 2.5 broadway show. If greedy producers want to somehow split that up into two parts -- when this first movie is already longer than the broadway version -- then yes they can go f*** themselves. People who gouge the public for money like this for zero reason should be executed on live television for everyone's enjoyment
I don't get it.
I love a good cliffhanger, and it makes sense to do it for a musical that has an actual intermission baked into it.
There's examples where it's been done poorly, but it's not automatically bad as some sort of rule.
The actual broadway musical is shorter than this part 1 movie excluding the intermission
The actual broadway musical is shorter than this part 1 movie excluding the intermission
I mean this is also adapting a 500+ page book not just the musical
I mean this is also adapting a 500+ page book not just the musical
No. The screenplay writer is the the same guy who penned the stage show. It was even said the reason behind splitting the movie into two parts is because they want the first part to end where act 1 of the broadway show ended, and that having the movie continue after that would be "anti-climactic". All the crew working on this movie have referred to it as a stage to screen adaptation.
It is the same loose adaptation of the novel that the original broadway show was
They did the entire story in a 2.5 broadway show. If greedy producers want to somehow split that up into two parts -- when this first movie is already longer than the broadway version -- then yes they can go f*** themselves. People who gouge the public for money like this for zero reason should be executed on live television for everyone's enjoyment
trust the vision
trust the vision
They did the entire story in a 2.5 broadway show. If greedy producers want to somehow split that up into two parts -- when this first movie is already longer than the broadway version -- then yes they can go f*** themselves. People who gouge the public for money like this for zero reason should be executed on live television for everyone's enjoyment
Sane take
They did the entire story in a 2.5 broadway show. If greedy producers want to somehow split that up into two parts -- when this first movie is already longer than the broadway version -- then yes they can go f*** themselves. People who gouge the public for money like this for zero reason should be executed on live television for everyone's enjoyment
Isn’t Broadway shows and movies different? Just a thought…