How does everyone feel about this theory of Dems challenging the election and holding their own inauguration regardless of outcome if Trump wins?
How does everyone feel about this theory of Dems challenging the election and holding their own inauguration regardless of outcome if Trump wins?
lmaoooo
trump doing this in the reverse scenario is 1000000000x more likely
lmaoooo
trump doing this in the reverse scenario is 1000000000x more likely
But they’ve come out and said that this is what they’re gonna do? I’m going off of facts.
Idk who that guy is but the nytimes article is there. Funny that it’s Pedosta saying all this too
But they’ve come out and said that this is what they’re gonna do? I’m going off of facts.
https://twitter.com/benyt/status/1290048084857065472Idk who that guy is but the nytimes article is there. Funny that it’s Pedosta saying all this too
you just posted the literal opposite of facts
you just posted the literal opposite of facts
Explain how? I asked something and then backed it up with evidence where the DNC says it MAY happen based on their own war games scenario. Pelosi has also said things on video that echo this exact train of thought seen in the war game.
ayo idc if we end up disagreeing, if Synopsis is about to drag you, run the f*** out of the way
Explain how? I asked something and then backed it up with evidence where the DNC says it MAY happen based on their own war games scenario. Pelosi has also said things on video that echo this exact train of thought seen in the war game.
they didn't "say" anything
they didn't "say" anything
I’m trying to reason with you but you’re immature in your arguments. I’m bringing sources to the table and you’re pretending they aren’t there my guy.

I’m trying to reason with you but you’re immature in your arguments. I’m bringing sources to the table and you’re pretending they aren’t there my guy.
!https://youtu.be/rj7MYlfyRWsa scenario in a simulation =/= saying something once it happens in reality.
a scenario in a simulation =/= saying something once it happens in reality.
“Once it happens” key words in your post. How could I pose a question based off of the future? I’m going off their most recent statements and simulations.
“Once it happens” key words in your post. How could I pose a question based off of the future? I’m going off their most recent statements and simulations.
W for the boy
“Once it happens” key words in your post. How could I pose a question based off of the future? I’m going off their most recent statements and simulations.
you literally said that they've said something that they haven't said, and cited a simulation where one guy "shocked" the other participants. i mean, literally. just read that bullshit again. states aren't going to secede and dems aren't going to up end the system because they lose an election lmfao. it just reeks of qanon nonsense which I imagine is where you heard that bullshit to begin with.
you literally said that they've said something that they haven't said, and cited a simulation where one guy "shocked" the other participants. i mean, literally. just read that bullshit again. states aren't going to secede and dems aren't going to up end the system because they lose an election lmfao. it just reeks of qanon nonsense which I imagine is where you heard that bullshit to begin with.
Using the 4 D’s on me I like it (shout out ye) I don’t know what qanon is. I’m just repeating what the DNC themselves have said. Guess we’ll just wait and see
Left will “lmfao” you to death as if that means they’re correct. It’s a means to dismiss/discredit what I’m saying on zero grounds. With no proof of this NOT being the plan
Using the 4 D’s on me I like it (shout out ye) I don’t know what qanon is. I’m just repeating what the DNC themselves have said. Guess we’ll just wait and see
you have a very, very, very weird definition of the wordc"say"
"with no proof of this not being the plan"
I cannot literally prove that lizard people from the fifth dimension are not simply running us through a simulation. therefore, the idea must be debated with the utmost seriousness despite being total nonsense.
you have a very, very, very weird definition of the wordc"say"
Alright I’ll rephrase cause I could see how that word is very general. I’m going based off of the DNCs current wargame simulation and also from what Nancy Pelosi said. YES I meant said right there and I believe I used it in the correct context.
Alright I’ll rephrase cause I could see how that word is very general. I’m going based off of the DNCs current wargame simulation and also from what Nancy Pelosi said. YES I meant said right there and I believe I used it in the correct context.
great and now go read that wargames simulation again and and go somewhere else. states are not going to be seceding from the union and the dems wont be creating a constitutional crisis in hopes of installing joe biden lmfao. i know this is prolly hard for you to believe, but the dems don't hate trump near as much as theyd want you to believe.
"with no proof of this not being the plan"
I cannot literally prove that lizard people from the fifth dimension are not simply running us through a simulation. therefore, the idea must be debated with the utmost seriousness despite being total nonsense.
That quote you took is a little ehh cause I’m not a fan of that argument myself yet I caught myself using it, you got me there. I’ll rephrase as “with no evidence of their plan being something other than that” can you show me something that disputes my argument? I really want the other side I’m not closed minded I don’t WANT these people to have bad intentions, it’s just all I see from all fronts. I would love to be shown otherwise
great and now go read that wargames simulation again and and go somewhere else. states are not going to be seceding from the union and the dems wont be creating a constitutional crisis in hopes of installing joe biden lmfao. i know this is prolly hard for you to believe, but the dems don't hate trump near as much as theyd want you to believe.
Very passionate but your words hold no weight and no backing behind them. Like I said unless you can show me otherwise
That quote you took is a little ehh cause I’m not a fan of that argument myself yet I caught myself using it, you got me there. I’ll rephrase as “with no evidence of their plan being something other than that” can you show me something that disputes my argument? I really want the other side I’m not closed minded I don’t WANT these people to have bad intentions, it’s just all I see from all fronts. I would love to be shown otherwise
For one, the democrats have to pretend as though they have some sort of moral high ground on republicans. their civility and respect for procedures and rule of law is the only true contrast they can draw with republicans. So, no they aren't going to create a constitutional crisis because it loses them that moral high ground, because they don't oppose trump on any grounds other than the fact he's a bumbling idiot who doesn't respect civility politics.