Since when is Police a back up job?
What dusty one horse towns you guys live in where the cops are GED educated?
Acting like being a police officer is the same as working at a dead end factory job for 30+ years.
only 30% of officers have a 4 year degree. 50% have at least a 2 year
rest of them who knows what those bozos are on
I will read it. You know as much as anybody I had a very privleged childhood besides my father dying when I was 4 and more recently my mom passing away. But regardless I grew up in a picturesque village right out of a movie. I never felt unsafe and never had any problems so as a result my world view for many years was limited and skewed. As I’ve matured my world view and perspective has grown and I’m very willing to let it grow even more. A little bit ago I would have never even thought about police abolishment or defunding police but this whole recent situation has changed my tune on that. I’m not proud that it took yet another human dying for me to change my perspective but I admit I am not perfect. You and I have our differences but please don’t assume that I’m not sincere in my intentions, I wouldn’t make a thread if That was the case. I want the best for all humans who deserve it and am trying to learn how to get us there.
well if you are sincere in giving the idea some thought then that is good. like I said, just read some of the stuff there, there are other studies I have no issue linking as well that speak to this issue/solutions.
And I'm not saying not to be critical when you are reading these things and to just accept them. But hold them up against the questions you do have, and your current viewpoint. Ask yourself while reading this stuff why is the system as it is today the way it is, and why these people are advocating for abolition. As I mentioned before, a lot of people seem to treat the idea of abolition as some sort pie in the sky bit of idealism, but its a serious idea that has been worked on by highly intelligent people from all facets of society. they aren't just bullshitting about some imagined utopia and thats what i want more people to realize.
Source on Humanity doing so fine for thousands of years ?
It factually wasn’t, homicide rates in Europe were much higher then than now. That’s not to say anything about the police making it better or worse, just that humanity wasn’t doing “just fine”
First, I would have to imagine the number of men who become so enraged that they murder their wives upon learning they want a divorce is low. Second, as I've said many times, punishment has not been a successful deterrent. There are numerous studies that indicate this.
If someone murders their wife in that sort of violent rage, which as I said probably isn't too common, then the police cannot prevent the crime anyways. So the only thing you'd need them for hypothetically is to detain the citizen and bring him to jail. Well, there's no reason that a group of elected citizens or trained de-escalation, mental health, and trauma experts can't supervise his home as he awaits his trial, and then there's no reason they wouldn't be able to detain him and bring him to a rehab facility of some sorts if found guilty.
For starters, what I gave was obviously a crude example. There's a huge variety of crimes of passion.
My issue with what you're saying is you seem to be framing this as "can the police prevent the crime from occurring by directly stopping the criminal?" Obviously, that's impossible in a lot of these cases i.e. you brought up a personal example.
My point is that the THREAT of being jailed is what stops us from committing those kind of crimes. Adults get angry and murderous ALL of the time, for a variety of reasons. Just look at the number of people calling for certain politicians' heads- they'd probably go through with those threats if they met them in person, it's the risk of being thrown in a cell that stops us from wilding out.
You say that studies show deterrence doesn't work.
1. What studies? You've brought this up so many times, might as well drop some links.
2. This is impossible to gauge. How can you determine how many crimes the threat of punishment has "stopped" when these crimes ONLY exist as unspoken intentions? People aren't going to casually admit their violent/illegal desires. You're most likely misinterpreting/misrepresenting whatever studies you think have made this claim.
Last thing I want to say is that these crimes can mean more than murder. It can mean sexual assault, stealing, beating the s*** out of someone, etc ... all biological impulses that most people toss out of their heads because the rule of law exists.
Saying "most people don't do those things" is
1. Irrelevant because even 10% of the population descending into violence and anarchy would be a huge mess
and 2. unproven since you're basing these assumptions off of a world where police exist
only 30% of officers have a 4 year degree. 50% have at least a 2 year
rest of them who knows what those bozos are on
I know they let in a lot of ex-military.
And you already know the military is known to have trigger happy sociopaths.
In my town the minimum is a 2 year degree, but the police force is apparently pretty prestigious.
For starters, what I gave was obviously a crude example. There's a huge variety of crimes of passion.
My issue with what you're saying is you seem to be framing this as "can the police prevent the crime from occurring by directly stopping the criminal?" Obviously, that's impossible in a lot of these cases i.e. you brought up a personal example.
My point is that the THREAT of being jailed is what stops us from committing those kind of crimes. Adults get angry and murderous ALL of the time, for a variety of reasons. Just look at the number of people calling for certain politicians' heads- they'd probably go through with those threats if they met them in person, it's the risk of being thrown in a cell that stops us from wilding out.
You say that studies show deterrence doesn't work.
1. What studies? You've brought this up so many times, might as well drop some links.
2. This is impossible to gauge. How can you determine how many crimes the threat of punishment has "stopped" when these crimes ONLY exist as unspoken intentions? People aren't going to casually admit their violent/illegal desires. You're most likely misinterpreting/misrepresenting whatever studies you think have made this claim.
Last thing I want to say is that these crimes can mean more than murder. It can mean sexual assault, stealing, beating the s*** out of someone, etc ... all biological impulses that most people toss out of their heads because the rule of law exists.
Saying "most people don't do those things" is
1. Irrelevant because even 10% of the population descending into violence and anarchy would be a huge mess
and 2. unproven since you're basing these assumptions off of a world where police exist
Investing in mental health with saved money from police budgets would help prevent a lot of these things from happening. Also funding social work as well
Investing in mental health with saved money from police budgets would help prevent a lot of these things from happening. Also funding social work as well
I typed that out with the assumption that mental health services aren't mandatory. Millions of people are either unaware that they have a problem or unwilling to go if they do.
New York was famous for being peaceful in this era
Yeah that’s what I said in my original post sucks how much it changed
First, I would have to imagine the number of men who become so enraged that they murder their wives upon learning they want a divorce is low. Second, as I've said many times, punishment has not been a successful deterrent. There are numerous studies that indicate this.
If someone murders their wife in that sort of violent rage, which as I said probably isn't too common, then the police cannot prevent the crime anyways. So the only thing you'd need them for hypothetically is to detain the citizen and bring him to jail. Well, there's no reason that a group of elected citizens or trained de-escalation, mental health, and trauma experts can't supervise his home as he awaits his trial, and then there's no reason they wouldn't be able to detain him and bring him to a rehab facility of some sorts if found guilty.
Actually, the numbers for femicide are not that low, husbands beating and killing their wives are not that uncommon, this article says that approximately three women are murdered by their current or former partners every day in America :
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/10/why-arent-women-us-also-protesting-against-femicide
And honestly this "mental health services" concept is so vague to me.
What kind of therapy removes anger and greed from a person? How does that even work/what does it look like?
Actually, the numbers for femicide are not that low, husbands beating and killing their wives are not that uncommon, this article says that approximately three women are murdered by their current or former partners every day in America :
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/10/why-arent-women-us-also-protesting-against-femicide/
i can't view it cuz washingtonpost has a trash paywall
This source is just for Europe but
But in general, wars were much more common in the Middle Ages and ancient era. And in a time went war meant “once we get in this city we’ll rape and kill everybody we see and send the rest to slavery once we sober up” you can imagine life’s being somewhat more violent than now
Actually, the numbers for femicide are not that low, husbands beating and killing their wives are not that uncommon, this article says that approximately three women are murdered by their current or former partners every day in America :
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/10/why-arent-women-us-also-protesting-against-femicide/
And a good portion of those who commit DV are cops
i can't view it cuz washingtonpost has a trash paywall
Here's the FBI report it is based on vpc.org/studies/wmmw2019.pdf
And a good portion of those who commit DV are cops
Domestic violence is not exclusive to cops. And even if it is, basic rule of stats is correlation =/= causation lol.
It's just as likely that abusive a******s become cops, not the other way around.
For starters, what I gave was obviously a crude example. There's a huge variety of crimes of passion.
My issue with what you're saying is you seem to be framing this as "can the police prevent the crime from occurring by directly stopping the criminal?" Obviously, that's impossible in a lot of these cases i.e. you brought up a personal example.
My point is that the THREAT of being jailed is what stops us from committing those kind of crimes. Adults get angry and murderous ALL of the time, for a variety of reasons. Just look at the number of people calling for certain politicians' heads- they'd probably go through with those threats if they met them in person, it's the risk of being thrown in a cell that stops us from wilding out.
You say that studies show deterrence doesn't work.
1. What studies? You've brought this up so many times, might as well drop some links.
2. This is impossible to gauge. How can you determine how many crimes the threat of punishment has "stopped" when these crimes ONLY exist as unspoken intentions? People aren't going to casually admit their violent/illegal desires. You're most likely misinterpreting/misrepresenting whatever studies you think have made this claim.
Last thing I want to say is that these crimes can mean more than murder. It can mean sexual assault, stealing, beating the s*** out of someone, etc ... all biological impulses that most people toss out of their heads because the rule of law exists.
Saying "most people don't do those things" is
1. Irrelevant because even 10% of the population descending into violence and anarchy would be a huge mess
and 2. unproven since you're basing these assumptions off of a world where police exist
I will compile all the studies and link them to you tomorrow when i have the time
But, I will say a lot of your post is simply working off assumptions as well.
And a good portion of those who commit DV are cops
And what if they quit their jobs ? They still are s***ty people.
I will compile all the studies and link them to you tomorrow when i have the time
But, I will say a lot of your post is simply working off assumptions as well.
Sure, I'll read them. Feel free to lmk what assumptions you think I'm operating on as well.